• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚批准新药的潜在治疗价值:一项回顾性队列研究。

Potential therapeutic value of new drugs approved in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2023 Apr;47(2):203-207. doi: 10.1071/AH22280.

DOI:10.1071/AH22280
PMID:36702153
Abstract

Objective To examine the potential therapeutic value of new medicines approved in the US and both approved and not approved in Australia. Methods A list of new medicines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 was assembled and it was determined which of these medicines were also approved in Australia. Three metrics - first in class, priority review and therapeutic rating by two independent organisations - were used to determine the potential therapeutic value of the medicines. The percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value was compared using each of the three metrics. Results A total of 273 drugs were approved by the FDA, of which 147 (53.8%) were approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the Australian regulator. For each of these three metrics, the percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value approved in Australia was the same: first in class (yes vs no: Chi-squared P  = 0.8562), priority review (yes vs no: Chi-squared P  = 0.4593), therapeutic rating (major/moderate vs little/no: Chi-squared P  = 0.9006). Some of the 126 drugs not approved may be therapeutically important. Conclusions New medicines approved in the US between 2015 and 2020 without potential significant therapeutic value are as likely to be introduced into Australia as drugs with potential significant therapeutic value. Some potentially valuable drugs may not have been submitted for approval in Australia by the companies making them.

摘要

目的 考察美国批准和澳大拉西亚(澳大利亚和新西兰)批准和未批准的新药的潜在治疗价值。

方法 收集了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间批准的新药清单,并确定了这些药物中哪些也在澳大利亚获得批准。使用三个指标——首创性、优先审查和两个独立组织的治疗评级——来确定药物的潜在治疗价值。使用这三个指标中的每一个来比较具有和不具有潜在重要治疗价值的药物的百分比。

结果 共有 273 种药物被 FDA 批准,其中 147 种(53.8%)被澳大利亚监管机构治疗商品管理局批准。对于这三个指标中的每一个,具有和不具有潜在重要治疗价值的药物在澳大利亚的批准比例相同:首创性(是与否:卡方检验 P=0.8562)、优先审查(是与否:卡方检验 P=0.4593)、治疗评级(主要/中度与小/无:卡方检验 P=0.9006)。未批准的 126 种药物中的一些可能具有治疗意义。

结论 在 2015 年至 2020 年期间,美国批准的没有潜在重要治疗价值的新药与具有潜在重要治疗价值的药物一样有可能被引入澳大利亚。一些潜在有价值的药物可能没有被生产它们的公司提交给澳大利亚批准。

相似文献

1
Potential therapeutic value of new drugs approved in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚批准新药的潜在治疗价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2023 Apr;47(2):203-207. doi: 10.1071/AH22280.
2
Use of priority and provisional approval pathways by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration in approving new medicines: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚治疗商品管理局在批准新药方面使用优先和临时批准途径:一项横断面研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Jun;46(3):309-315. doi: 10.1071/AH22008.
3
Initial and supplementary indication approval of new targeted cancer drugs by the FDA, EMA, Health Canada, and TGA.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、加拿大卫生部(Health Canada)和澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(TGA)对新型靶向抗癌药物的初始和补充适应证批准。
Invest New Drugs. 2022 Aug;40(4):798-809. doi: 10.1007/s10637-022-01227-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.1995 年至 2010 年期间获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物的新配方的批准和时间,并跟踪到 2021 年。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221096. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1096. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Reforms to the patented medicine prices review board and the introduction of new drugs in Canada: An observational study.加拿大专利药品价格审查委员会改革与新药引入:一项观察性研究。
Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):1018-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
New drug approval times and 'therapeutic potential' in Canada, Australia, Sweden and the United States during the period 1992 to 1998.1992年至1998年期间加拿大、澳大利亚、瑞典和美国的新药审批时间及“治疗潜力”
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Summer;7(2):97-101.
7
Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study.美国和欧洲(2011-20 年)药物一线与二线适应证的治疗价值:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 5;382:e074166. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074166.
8
Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals?美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的优先审评药物:是时候实现药品国际监管协调了吗?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):709-15. doi: 10.1002/pds.3793. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Association between FDA and EMA expedited approval programs and therapeutic value of new medicines: retrospective cohort study.FDA 和 EMA 加速审批计划与新药的治疗价值之间的关联:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 7;371:m3434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3434.