• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错失恐惧:美国与加拿大的药物可及性。

Fear of missing out: Drug availability in the United States vs Canada.

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Dec;30(12):1349-1354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1349.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1349
PMID:39612252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11607214/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Per capita spending on drugs in the United States is double that of Canada. One commonly debated point when comparing the 2 countries is whether this additional spending allows residents of the United States access to valuable therapies not available in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the therapeutic value of prescription drugs used in the United States that are not marketed in Canada.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System data to identify drugs purchased in the United States but not in Canada from 2017 to 2021. Drug listing and regulatory review statuses were obtained. We categorized the drugs into 8 mutually exclusive groups: listing status in Canada ("cancelled post-market" or "dormant; approved but not marketed; cancelled pre-market"), other alternatives available ("formulation unavailable," "existing drug class," or "therapeutically similar"), "pre-approval," "atypical access available," or "unavailable without alternatives marketed" in Canada. Therapeutic value assessments of drugs in the last category were obtained from 3 international organizations.

RESULTS

2,084 products were purchased in the United States but not in Canada from 2017 to 2021; 1,685 were excluded because they were not prescription drugs, were combinations in which each active pharmaceutical ingredient was already available in the United States as a separate drug, had been discontinued in the United States by August 30, 2023, or were marketed in Canada by August 30, 2023. After exclusions, there were 399 drugs; 120 (30%) were "cancelled post-market," 38 (10%) were "dormant; approved but not marketed; cancelled pre-market," 49 (12%) were "formulation unavailable," 130 (33%) were "existing drug class," 35 (9%) were "therapeutically similar," 3 (1%) were "preapproval," 15 (4%) were "atypical access available," and 9 (2%) were "unavailable" in Canada. 6 of the 9 drugs had been evaluated by 1 or more independent organizations, and all 6 were rated as offering minor to no additional therapeutic value compared with existing drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

There was similar access to important prescription drug therapies in the United States and Canada. Overall, the additional spending in the United States may not have necessarily translated into access to important therapeutic innovations.

摘要

背景

美国的人均药品支出是加拿大的两倍。在比较这两个国家时,人们经常争论的一点是,这种额外的支出是否让美国居民能够获得在加拿大无法获得的有价值的疗法。

目的

描述在美国使用但未在加拿大上市的处方药物的治疗价值。

方法

本横断面研究使用 IQVIA 多国综合数据分析系统的数据,确定了 2017 年至 2021 年期间在美国购买但在加拿大未购买的药物。获取了药物上市和监管审查状况。我们将药物分为 8 个互斥组:加拿大的上市状况(“上市后取消”或“休眠;批准但未上市;上市前取消”)、其他可用替代药物(“制剂不可用”、“现有药物类别”或“治疗上相似”)、“预批准”、“非典型准入可用”或“在加拿大无替代药物可用”。对最后一类药物的治疗价值评估来自 3 个国际组织。

结果

2017 年至 2021 年期间,在美国购买但在加拿大未购买的产品有 2084 种;由于它们不是处方药、是每种活性药物成分在美国都已作为单独药物上市的组合、已在美国于 2023 年 8 月 30 日之前停产、或在加拿大于 2023 年 8 月 30 日之前上市,因此排除了 1685 种产品。排除后,有 399 种药物;120 种(30%)为“上市后取消”,38 种(10%)为“休眠;批准但未上市;上市前取消”,49 种(12%)为“制剂不可用”,130 种(33%)为“现有药物类别”,35 种(9%)为“治疗上相似”,3 种(1%)为“预批准”,15 种(4%)为“非典型准入可用”,9 种(2%)在加拿大“不可用”。其中 9 种药物中的 6 种已被 1 个或多个独立组织评估,所有 6 种药物均被评为与现有药物相比提供的治疗价值较小或没有额外价值。

结论

美国和加拿大的重要处方药物治疗方法可获得性相似。总体而言,美国的额外支出不一定转化为获得重要治疗创新的机会。

相似文献

1
Fear of missing out: Drug availability in the United States vs Canada.错失恐惧:美国与加拿大的药物可及性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Dec;30(12):1349-1354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1349.
2
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.美国处方药价格居高不下:根源与改革前景。
JAMA. 2016;316(8):858-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11237.
3
A comparison of new drug availability in Canada and the United States and potential therapeutic implications of differences.加拿大和美国新药可及性的比较以及差异的潜在治疗意义。
Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.12.015. Epub 2006 Feb 10.
4
Added Therapeutic Benefit of Top-Selling Brand-name Drugs in Medicare.增加了医疗保险中最畅销的品牌药物的治疗效益。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1283-1289. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4034.
5
Affordability and availability of off-patent drugs in the United States-the case for importing from abroad: observational study.美国非专利药的可负担性与可及性——从国外进口的案例:观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Mar 19;360:k831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k831.
6
Coverage of Novel Therapeutic Agents by Medicare Prescription Drug Plans Following FDA Approval.医疗保险处方药计划在 FDA 批准后对新治疗药物的覆盖范围。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1230-1238. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1230.
7
Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.1995 年至 2010 年期间获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物的新配方的批准和时间,并跟踪到 2021 年。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221096. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1096. eCollection 2022 May.
8
The FDA Unapproved Drugs Initiative: An Observational Study of the Consequences for Drug Prices and Shortages in the United States.FDA 未批准药品倡议:对美国药品价格和短缺后果的观察性研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1066-1076. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1066.
9
A Comparative Analysis of International Drug Price Negotiation Frameworks: An Interview Study of Key Stakeholders.国际药品价格谈判框架的比较分析:关键利益相关者访谈研究
Milbank Q. 2024 Dec;102(4):1004-1031. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12714. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
10
Effect of Evergreened Reformulations on Medicaid Expenditures and Patient Access from 2008 to 2016.2008 年至 2016 年常青配方对医疗补助支出和患者可及性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):780-792. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18366. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and quantity of data used by Health Canada in approving new drugs.加拿大卫生部在批准新药时所使用数据的质量和数量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 30;10:1299239. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1299239. eCollection 2023.
2
Therapeutic value of new medicines not submitted to Health Canada 2014-2021: Cross-sectional study.2014 - 2021年未提交给加拿大卫生部的新药的治疗价值:横断面研究。
Health Policy. 2023 Oct;136:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104901. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
3
Is Canada missing out? An assessment of drugs approved internationally between 2016 and 2020 and not submitted for Health Canada review.加拿大在错失良机吗?对2016年至2020年间在国际上获批但未提交给加拿大卫生部审评的药物的评估。
CMAJ. 2023 Jun 12;195(23):E815-E820. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230339.
4
Therapeutic Value of Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval or Conditional Marketing Authorization in the US and Europe From 2007 to 2021.2007 年至 2021 年美国和欧洲加速批准或有条件上市药物的治疗价值。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222685. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2685.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering drugs as adjunctive therapy for adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.降糖药物作为成人 1 型糖尿病辅助治疗的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Mar;23(3):822-831. doi: 10.1111/dom.14291. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Association between FDA and EMA expedited approval programs and therapeutic value of new medicines: retrospective cohort study.FDA 和 EMA 加速审批计划与新药的治疗价值之间的关联:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 7;371:m3434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3434.
7
New drugs: where did we go wrong and what can we do better?新药:我们错在哪里,如何才能做得更好?
BMJ. 2019 Jul 10;366:l4340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4340.
8
Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.甲磺酸奥马环素治疗慢性髓性白血病。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2016 May;9(5):419-24. doi: 10.1586/17474086.2016.1151351. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
9
Health Canada's use of its priority review process for new drugs: a cohort study.加拿大卫生部对新药使用优先审评程序的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 11;5(5):e006816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006816.
10
How innovative are new drugs launched in the UK? A retrospective study of new drugs listed in the British National Formulary (BNF) 2001-2012.在英国上市的新药创新程度如何?对《英国国家处方集》(BNF)2001 - 2012年列出的新药进行的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006235.