• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于联邦学习的韩国预检分诊及 acuity 量表的分诊临床支持系统

Clinical support system for triage based on federated learning for the Korea triage and acuity scale.

作者信息

Chang Hansol, Yu Jae Yong, Lee Geun Hyeong, Heo Sejin, Lee Se Uk, Hwang Sung Yeon, Yoon Hee, Cha Won Chul, Shin Tae Gun, Sim Min Seob, Jo Ik Joon, Kim Taerim

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 115 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, South Korea.

Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, 115 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06355, South Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 17;9(8):e19210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19210. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19210
PMID:37654468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study developed a clinical support system based on federated learning to predict the need for a revised Korea Triage Acuity Scale (KTAS) to facilitate triage.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that used data from 11,952,887 patients in the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) from 2016 to 2018 for model development. Separate cohorts were created based on the emergency medical center level in the NEDIS: regional emergency medical center (REMC), local emergency medical center (LEMC), and local emergency medical institution (LEMI). External and temporal validation used data from emergency department (ED) of the study site from 2019 to 2021. Patient features obtained during the triage process and the initial KTAS scores were used to develop the prediction model. Federated learning was used to rectify the disparity in data quality between EDs. The patient's demographic information, vital signs in triage, mental status, arrival information, and initial KTAS were included in the input feature.

RESULTS

3,626,154 patients' visits were included in the regional emergency medical center cohort; 8,278,081 patients' visits were included in the local emergency medical center cohort; and 48,652 patients' visits were included in the local emergency medical institution cohort. The study site cohort, which is used for external and temporal validation, included 135,780 patients visits. Among the patients in the REMC and study site cohorts, KTAS level 3 patients accounted for the highest proportion at 42.4% and 45.1%, respectively, whereas in the LEMC and LEMI cohorts, KTAS level 4 patients accounted for the highest proportion. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction model was 0.786, 0.750, and 0.770 in the external and temporal validation. Patients with revised KTAS scores had a higher admission rate and ED mortality rate than those with unaltered KTAS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel system might accurately predict the likelihood of KTAS acuity revision and support clinician-based triage.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究开发了一种基于联邦学习的临床支持系统,用于预测修订韩国分诊 acuity 量表(KTAS)的必要性,以促进分诊。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,使用了2016年至2018年韩国国家急诊科信息系统(NEDIS)中11,952,887例患者的数据进行模型开发。根据NEDIS中的急救医疗中心级别创建了单独的队列:区域急救医疗中心(REMC)、当地急救医疗中心(LEMC)和当地急救医疗机构(LEMI)。外部和时间验证使用了研究地点急诊科2019年至2021年的数据。分诊过程中获得的患者特征和初始KTAS分数用于开发预测模型。联邦学习用于纠正急诊科之间数据质量的差异。输入特征包括患者的人口统计学信息、分诊时的生命体征、精神状态、到达信息和初始KTAS。

结果

区域急救医疗中心队列纳入了3,626,154例患者就诊;当地急救医疗中心队列纳入了8,278,081例患者就诊;当地急救医疗机构队列纳入了48,652例患者就诊。用于外部和时间验证的研究地点队列包括135,780例患者就诊。在REMC和研究地点队列的患者中,KTAS 3级患者的比例最高,分别为42.4%和45.1%,而在LEMC和LEMI队列中,KTAS 4级患者的比例最高。预测模型在外部和时间验证中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.786、0.750和0.770。KTAS分数修订的患者比KTAS分数未改变的患者有更高的入院率和急诊科死亡率。

结论

这种新型系统可能准确预测KTAS acuity修订的可能性,并支持基于临床医生的分诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191a/10465866/22dcc11c798b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191a/10465866/22dcc11c798b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191a/10465866/22dcc11c798b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical support system for triage based on federated learning for the Korea triage and acuity scale.基于联邦学习的韩国预检分诊及 acuity 量表的分诊临床支持系统
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 17;9(8):e19210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19210. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Changes in Relative Importance of the 5-Level Triage System, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, for the Disposition of Emergency Patients Induced by Forced Reduction in Its Level Number: a Multi-Center Registry-based Retrospective Cohort Study.5 级分诊系统、韩国分诊和 acuity 量表的相对重要性变化对其级别数量强制减少导致的急诊患者处置的影响:一项基于多中心登记的回顾性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 15;34(14):e114. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e114.
3
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
4
An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department.基于可解释机器学习的急诊分诊评分——急诊风险预测评分(SERP)的外部验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 19;12(1):17466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22233-w.
5
Modification and Validation of a Complaint-Oriented Emergency Department Triage System: A Multicenter Observational Study.基于投诉的急诊科分诊系统的修订与验证:一项多中心观察性研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Dec;62(12):1145-1154. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1145.
6
Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Frailty Scale-Adjusted Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Older Patients in the Emergency Department.中文译文:临床虚弱量表调整后的韩国分诊和急症严重程度量表在急诊科老年患者中的验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 8;60(6):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060955.
7
Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).在考虑韩国分诊和 acuity 量表 (KTAS) 中的患者疼痛时,会出现过度分诊。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216519. eCollection 2019.
8
Emergency department utilization in elderly patients: a report from the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) of Korea, 2018-2022.老年患者的急诊科利用情况:韩国国家急诊科信息系统(NEDIS)2018 - 2022年报告
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;10(S):S26-S35. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.146. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
9
Validity of the Korean triage and acuity scale in older patients compared to the adult group.与成人组相比,韩国分诊和 acuity 量表在老年患者中的有效性。
Exp Gerontol. 2023 May;175:112136. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112136. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department.基于机器学习和初始护理评估的急诊科分诊系统
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Jan;26(1):13-19. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.13. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence for severity triage based on conversations in an emergency department in Korea.基于韩国某急诊科对话的人工智能严重程度分诊
Sci Rep. 2025 May 15;15(1):16870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99874-0.
2
Effects of Critical Thinking Disposition, Clinical Judgement, and Nurse-Physician Collaboration on Triage Competency Among Triage Nurses.批判性思维倾向、临床判断及医护协作对分诊护士分诊能力的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;13(4):405. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040405.
3
Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Current challenges in adopting machine learning to critical care and emergency medicine.将机器学习应用于重症监护和急诊医学的当前挑战。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;10(2):132-137. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.041. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
The effect of regional distribution of isolation rooms in emergency departments on ambulance travel time during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间急诊科隔离病房的区域分布对救护车出诊时间的影响。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;10(2):191-199. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.355. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
Artificial intelligence decision points in an emergency department.
利用机器学习和自然语言处理提高急诊科分诊性能的系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01135-2.
急诊科中的人工智能决策点
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;9(3):165-168. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.366. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Is AVPU comparable to GCS in critical prehospital decisions? - A cross-sectional study.在关键的院前决策中,AVPU 与 GCS 相比如何?——一项横断面研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.042. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
5
Machine learning-based suggestion for critical interventions in the management of potentially severe conditioned patients in emergency department triage.基于机器学习的建议,用于对急诊科分诊中潜在严重病情的患者进行关键干预。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14422-4.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.重症医学中的人工智能
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 22;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03915-3.
7
Federated Learning of Electronic Health Records to Improve Mortality Prediction in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Machine Learning Approach.用于改善COVID-19住院患者死亡率预测的电子健康记录联邦学习:机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 27;9(1):e24207. doi: 10.2196/24207.
8
Federated Learning on Clinical Benchmark Data: Performance Assessment.基于临床基准数据的联邦学习:性能评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 26;22(10):e20891. doi: 10.2196/20891.
9
Factors affecting the accuracy of nurse triage in tertiary care emergency departments.影响三级护理急诊科护士分诊准确性的因素。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 7;20(4):163-167. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.297462. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
10
The future of digital health with federated learning.联合学习助力数字健康的未来。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 14;3:119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1. eCollection 2020.