• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较小切口微透镜取出术、飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术或激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗近视的中央角膜厚度。

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

机构信息

Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.

State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Sep 1;38(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03862-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-023-03862-7
PMID:37656340
Abstract

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (P = 0.373). At 1 year postoperatively, the CCT reduction was overestimated by 17.85 ± 5.36 µm in the SMILE group, underestimated by 4.31 ± 7.08 µm in the FS-LASIK group, and underestimated by 7.60 ± 8.28 µm in the LASEK group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). In the FS-LASIK group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction was not related to the predicted CCT reduction (P = 0.095). The laser platform may overestimate the CCT reduction for SMILE and underestimate it for FS-LASIK and LASEK. FS-LASIK has a much higher level of accuracy in CCT reduction, which is not influenced by refractive correction.

摘要

比较小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)、飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗近视的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。这是一项回顾性病例系列研究。纳入 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月在我院接受 SMILE、FS-LASIK 或 LASEK 治疗并完成 1 年随访的患者。采用 Pentacam 角膜地形图仪测量 CCT。通过激光平台获得预测 CCT 减少量。使用 Pentacam 角膜地形图仪测量术前和术后 CCT 的减少量,定义为 CCT 减少量。SMILE 组 100 眼,FS-LASIK 组 100 眼,LASEK 组 100 眼。三种手术的预测 CCT 减少量差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),但术后测量 CCT 减少量差异无统计学意义(P=0.373)。术后 1 年,SMILE 组 CCT 减少量高估 17.85±5.36μm,FS-LASIK 组低估 4.31±7.08μm,LASEK 组低估 7.60±8.28μm(P<0.001,P<0.001)。在 FS-LASIK 组,预测 CCT 减少量与测量 CCT 减少量的差异与预测 CCT 减少量无关(P=0.095)。激光平台可能高估 SMILE 的 CCT 减少量,低估 FS-LASIK 和 LASEK 的 CCT 减少量。FS-LASIK 在 CCT 减少方面具有更高的准确性,不受屈光矫正的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.比较小切口微透镜取出术、飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术或激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗近视的中央角膜厚度。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Sep 1;38(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03862-7.
2
Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.评估 SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视后中央角膜厚度预测值与实际值的差异。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1877310. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.SMILE、LASEK 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 术后角膜变形参数的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):310-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140422-01.
4
Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视术后角膜生物力学及其影响因素。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03320-2. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.在使用飞秒激光辅助或机械微型角膜刀辅助进行激光上皮下角膜磨镶术和准分子原位角膜磨镶术制作角膜瓣后,影响-6.0D至-10.0D近视患者近视回退的预测因素。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;40(1):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01179-5. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia.低中度近视患者经机械性角膜板层刀和飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后近视回退的预测因素。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;27(3):177-185. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1704793. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Comparison of Predictability in Central Corneal Thickness Reduction After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Correction.飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)与飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)矫正高度近视后中央角膜厚度减少的可预测性比较
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):549-559. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00629-1. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.
9
Predictability of Central Corneal Stromal Reduction After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Correction: A Prospective Randomized Contralateral Eye Study.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 矫正高度近视后中央角膜基质减少的可预测性:一项前瞻性随机对照对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2022 Feb;38(2):90-97. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20211112-01. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
10
Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术与飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术、准分子原位角膜磨镶术、准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术或准分子激光角膜表面切削术术后角膜生物力学特性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative and Prospective Study of Corneal Consumption and Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK Performed on the Contralateral Eyes With High Myopic Astigmatism.高度近视散光患者双眼行 SMILE 与 FS-LASIK 术后角膜消耗与角膜生物力学的对比前瞻性研究
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.29.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictability of Central Corneal Stromal Reduction After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Correction: A Prospective Randomized Contralateral Eye Study.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 矫正高度近视后中央角膜基质减少的可预测性:一项前瞻性随机对照对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2022 Feb;38(2):90-97. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20211112-01. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Corneal stromal thickness changes after myopic laser corneal refractive surgery.近视激光角膜屈光手术后角膜基质厚度的变化。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):334-341. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000765.
3
Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
评估 SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视后中央角膜厚度预测值与实际值的差异。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1877310. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
4
Corneal Remodeling After Myopic SMILE: An Optical Coherence Tomography and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study.近视 SMILE 术后角膜重塑:光学相干断层扫描和活体共聚焦显微镜研究。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Sep 1;36(9):597-605. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200713-01.
5
Changes in the Higher Order Ocular Aberrations and Central Corneal Thickness After T-PRK and Fs-LASIK.经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(T-PRK)和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Fs-LASIK)后高阶像差和中央角膜厚度的变化
Acta Inform Med. 2020 Jun;28(2):98-102. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.98-102.
6
Investigation of predictability and influence factors of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜切除术的预测性和影响因素的研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01374-4.
7
Comparison of anterior segment changes after femtosecond laser LASIK and SMILE using a dual rotating Scheimpflug analyzer.应用双重旋转式 Scheimpflug 分析仪比较飞秒激光 LASIK 和 SMILE 术后眼前节变化。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1257-0.
8
Comparison of Laser Platform Estimation and Objective Measurement of Maximum Ablation Depth Using Scheimpflug Pachymetry in Myopic Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.比较飞点扫描式角膜测厚仪激光平台估计与客观测量在近视性飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术中的最大切削深度。
Cornea. 2020 Mar;39(3):316-320. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002143.
9
Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Remodeling Over 2 Years in LASIK Versus SMILE: A Contralateral Eye Study.准分子原位角膜磨镶术与全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术2年角膜上皮重塑的对比:一项对侧眼研究
Cornea. 2019 Mar;38(3):290-296. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001821.
10
Lenticule Thickness Accuracy and Influence in Predictability and Stability for Different Refractive Errors after SMILE in Chinese Myopic Eyes.SMILE 术后中国近视眼中不同屈光不正的预测性和稳定性与透镜厚度准确性的关系。
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Jan;44(1):96-101. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1532011. Epub 2018 Oct 18.