• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者及其照顾者的支持性护理决策过程。

Supportive care decision-making processes of persons with dementia and their caregivers.

机构信息

Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1695-1717. doi: 10.1177/14713012231193139. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1177/14713012231193139
PMID:37656956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10688994/
Abstract

Little is known about the decision-making processes around seeking more supportive care for dementia. Persons with dementia are often left out of decision-making regarding seeking more supportive care as their dementia progresses. This paper provides a description of findings from the Decision-making in Alzheimer's Research project (DMAR) investigating the process of decision-making about transitions to more supportive care. We conducted 61 qualitative interviews with two stakeholder groups: 24 persons with dementia, and 37 informal caregivers to explore supportive care decisions and associated decision-making factors from the perspectives of persons with dementia and their caregivers. We identified four main decisions that persons with dementia and their informal caregivers played a role in: (1) sharing household responsibilities; (2) limiting routine daily activities; (3) bringing in formal support; and (4) moving to a care facility. Based on our findings we developed a schematized roadmap of decision-making that we used to guide the discussion of our findings. Four crosscutting themes emerged from our analysis: unknowns and uncertainties, maintaining life as you know it, there's no place like home and resource constraints. These results will be incorporated into the development of instruments whose goal is to identify preferences of persons with dementia and their caregivers, in order to include persons with dementia in care decisions even as their dementia progresses.

摘要

关于寻求更多支持性护理的决策过程知之甚少。随着痴呆症的进展,痴呆症患者往往被排除在寻求更多支持性护理的决策之外。本文描述了 Alzheimer's Research 项目(DMAR)决策研究的结果,该研究调查了关于过渡到更多支持性护理的决策过程。我们对两个利益相关者群体进行了 61 次定性访谈:24 名痴呆症患者和 37 名非正式照顾者,从痴呆症患者和他们的照顾者的角度探讨支持性护理决策和相关决策因素。我们确定了痴呆症患者和他们的非正式照顾者可以发挥作用的四个主要决策:(1)分担家务责任;(2)限制日常活动;(3)引入正式支持;(4)搬入护理设施。基于我们的发现,我们制定了一个决策的示意路线图,用于指导我们的发现的讨论。我们的分析中出现了四个交叉主题:未知和不确定性、保持你所知道的生活、没有地方像家一样、资源限制。这些结果将被纳入仪器的开发中,其目标是确定痴呆症患者及其照顾者的偏好,以便即使在痴呆症患者的病情进展时,也能让他们参与护理决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce9/10688994/dde52605a58d/nihms-1945032-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce9/10688994/dde52605a58d/nihms-1945032-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce9/10688994/dde52605a58d/nihms-1945032-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Supportive care decision-making processes of persons with dementia and their caregivers.痴呆症患者及其照顾者的支持性护理决策过程。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1695-1717. doi: 10.1177/14713012231193139. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
Dyadic Discrete Choice Experiments Enable Persons with Dementia and Informal Caregivers to Participate in Health Care Decision Making: A Mixed Methods Study.对偶离散选择实验使痴呆症患者和非专业照护者能够参与医疗保健决策:一项混合方法研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(1):105-114. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220604.
4
The compound role of a coordinator for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: qualitative study.痴呆居家患者及其非专业照护者的协调人复合角色:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05913-z.
5
How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? a multi-case study.痴呆症患者如何参与与健康和日常护理相关的决策?一项多案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 7;12:241. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241.
6
Making Decisions About Long-Term Institutional Care Placement Among People With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.痴呆患者及其照护者的长期机构护理安置决策:定性研究的系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2020 May 15;60(4):e329-e346. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz046.
7
A visual approach to facilitating conversations about supportive care options in the context of cognitive impairment.一种在认知障碍背景下促进关于支持性护理方案的对话的可视化方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104691. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
8
'There's more to life than money and health': Family caregivers' views on the role of Power of Attorney in proxy decisions about research participation for people living with dementia.“生活不仅仅是金钱和健康”:家庭照顾者对授权书在代理决策中的作用的看法,涉及参与痴呆症患者的研究。
Dementia (London). 2021 Jan;20(1):308-325. doi: 10.1177/1471301219884426. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
9
Refining a Digital Therapeutic Platform for Home Care Agencies in Dementia Care to Elicit Stakeholder Feedback: Focus Group Study With Stakeholders.完善用于痴呆症护理家庭护理机构的数字治疗平台以征求利益相关者反馈:与利益相关者进行焦点小组研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Mar 2;5(1):e32516. doi: 10.2196/32516.
10
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on the Challenges of Planning for and Accessing Long-Term Dementia Care Services Through Medicaid and Medicaid Waivers.关于通过医疗补助计划及医疗补助豁免项目规划和获取长期痴呆症护理服务所面临挑战的观点
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Apr 28:7334648251333181. doi: 10.1177/07334648251333181.
2
A visual approach to facilitating conversations about supportive care options in the context of cognitive impairment.一种在认知障碍背景下促进关于支持性护理方案的对话的可视化方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104691. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
3
Family Care Availability And Implications For Informal And Formal Care Used By Adults With Dementia In The US.美国家庭对老年痴呆症患者的护理可用性及其对非正式和正式护理的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Sep;40(9):1359-1367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00280.
4
Defining end of life in dementia: A systematic review.痴呆症终末期的定义:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1733-1746. doi: 10.1177/02692163211025457. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Strategies to engage people with dementia and their informal caregivers in dyadic intervention: A scoping review.策略以参与痴呆症患者及其非正规照护者的双体干预:范围综述。
Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
The perspectives of people with dementia on their future, end of life and on being cared for by others: A qualitative study.痴呆症患者对未来、生命末期以及被他人照顾的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1738-1752. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15644. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
7
A process-based approach to exploring the information behavior of informal caregivers of people living with dementia.一种基于流程的方法,用于探索生活在痴呆症患者身边的非正式护理人员的信息行为。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104341. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
8
Palliative Care in Advanced Dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 21;11:699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00699. eCollection 2020.
9
Missing the Mark: The Complexity of African American Dementia Family Caregiving.错失目标:非裔美国人痴呆症家庭护理的复杂性。
J Fam Nurs. 2020 Nov;26(4):294-301. doi: 10.1177/1074840720945329. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
A Seat at the Table: Supporting Persons with Severe Dementia in Communicating Their Preferences.就座于桌旁:支持严重痴呆症患者表达其偏好。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):647-660. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1764686. Epub 2020 Jul 7.