• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆居家患者及其非专业照护者的协调人复合角色:定性研究。

The compound role of a coordinator for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: qualitative study.

机构信息

Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway.

Faculty of Health studies, VID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05913-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05913-z
PMID:33198779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7670600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the number of persons with dementia is increasing, there has been a call for establishing sustainable clinical pathways for coordinating care and support for this group. The LIVE@Home.Path trial is a multicomponent, multi-disciplinary intervention combining learning, innovation, volunteer support and empowerment. To implement the intervention, a municipal coordinator has a crucial role. Implementation research on multicomponent interventions is complex and we conducted a qualitative study, aiming to explore the coordinator role and how a coordinator may empower persons with dementia in decision-making processes.

METHODS

Qualitative program evaluation combined with a hermeneutic interpretive approach was chosen as methodological approach. Sixteen dyads, consisting of the person with dementia and their main informal caregiver received the intervention by two coordinators. Of these, six dyads, three informal caregivers alone and the two care coordinators along with their leader, in sum, eighteen persons, participated in in-depth or focus group interviews, sharing their experiences after 6 months intervention.

RESULTS

We found that the coordinators fulfilled three functions for the participating dyads: being a safety net, meaning that the dyads might have little needs at the moment, but found safety in a relation to someone who might help if the situation should change; being a pathfinder, meaning that they supported the dyads in finding their way through the complicated system of care and support services; being a source for emotional care and support, meaning that they listened, acknowledged and gave counsel in times of distress. The coordinators emphasized that a trusting leader and work environment was crucial for them to fulfill these functions. We also found that it was challenging for the coordinators to build a relation to the persons with dementia in order to pursue genuine empowerment in decision-making processes.

CONCLUSION

We found the framework for follow-up to be a feasible starting point for establishing empowering coordination and a sustainable care pathway for persons with dementia and their informal caregivers. More meeting points between coordinator and person with dementia should be pursued in order to fulfill the persons' fundamental rights to participate in decision-making processes.

摘要

背景

随着痴呆症患者人数的增加,人们呼吁为这一群体建立可持续的临床路径,以协调护理和支持。LIVE@Home.Path 试验是一项多成分、多学科的干预措施,结合了学习、创新、志愿者支持和赋权。为了实施干预,市协调员起着至关重要的作用。对多成分干预措施的实施研究很复杂,因此我们进行了一项定性研究,旨在探讨协调员的角色以及协调员如何使痴呆症患者在决策过程中获得赋权。

方法

选择定性方案评估与解释学解释方法相结合作为方法学方法。16 对由痴呆症患者及其主要非正规照顾者组成的 dyad 接受了两名协调员的干预。其中,6 对 dyad、3 名非正规照顾者和 2 名照顾协调员及其负责人共 18 人参加了深入或焦点小组访谈,在干预 6 个月后分享了他们的经验。

结果

我们发现协调员为参与的 dyad 履行了三项职能:充当安全网,这意味着 dyad 目前可能没有什么需求,但与可能在情况发生变化时提供帮助的人建立关系,会感到安全;充当探路者,意味着他们支持 dyad 通过护理和支持服务的复杂系统找到自己的道路;充当情感关怀和支持的来源,这意味着他们在困难时期倾听、认可并提供建议。协调员强调,信任的领导和工作环境对他们履行这些职能至关重要。我们还发现,协调员很难与痴呆症患者建立关系,以便在决策过程中真正赋予他们权力。

结论

我们发现,为痴呆症患者及其非正规照顾者建立赋权协调和可持续护理途径的后续框架是一个可行的起点。应寻求更多协调员与痴呆症患者的接触点,以履行患者参与决策过程的基本权利。

相似文献

1
The compound role of a coordinator for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: qualitative study.痴呆居家患者及其非专业照护者的协调人复合角色:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05913-z.
2
Feedback System Analysis of a Multicomponent Intervention on Dyads of Home-Dwelling Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Results From the LIVE@Home.Path Trial.对居家痴呆患者及其照护者二元组进行多成分干预的反馈系统分析:来自LIVE@Home.Path试验的结果
Innov Aging. 2024 Feb 23;8(3):igae020. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae020. eCollection 2024.
3
LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.居家痴呆症患者及其照护者的临床路径创新:一项混合方法、阶梯式、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y.
4
The impact of medication reviews by general practitioners on psychotropic drug use and behavioral and psychological symptoms in home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the multicomponent cluster randomized controlled LIVE@Home.Path trial.全科医生进行药物评估对居家痴呆患者精神药物使用和行为及心理症状的影响:来自多组分集群随机对照 LIVE@Home.Path 试验的结果。
BMC Med. 2022 May 26;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02382-5.
5
The meaningfulness of participating in support groups for informal caregivers of older adults with dementia: a systematic review.参与老年痴呆症患者非正式照料者支持小组的意义:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jul 17;13(6):373-433. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2121.
6
Dyadic Discrete Choice Experiments Enable Persons with Dementia and Informal Caregivers to Participate in Health Care Decision Making: A Mixed Methods Study.对偶离散选择实验使痴呆症患者和非专业照护者能够参与医疗保健决策:一项混合方法研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(1):105-114. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220604.
7
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Experiences of caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with moderate to advanced dementia in adapting the Namaste Care program: a qualitative descriptive study.社区中患有中度至重度痴呆症的居家老年人照料者采用合十礼护理项目的经历:一项质性描述性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 12;8(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00401-6.
9
Dementia care in European countries, from the perspective of people with dementia and their caregivers.从痴呆症患者及其照护者的角度看欧洲国家的痴呆症护理。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jun;71(6):1405-16. doi: 10.1111/jan.12581. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
10
Development of a Caregivers' Support Platform (Connected Health Sustaining Home Stay in Dementia): Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Mixed Methods Study.护理人员支持平台的开发(连接健康维持痴呆症患者居家护理):一项纵向观察性混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):13280. doi: 10.2196/13280.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden and care time for dementia caregivers in the LIVE@Home.Path trial.居家生活路径试验中痴呆症照料者的负担与照料时间
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Mar;21(3):e14622. doi: 10.1002/alz.14622.
2
Palliative Care Coordination Interventions for Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Individuals with Dementia: An Integrative Review.针对社区痴呆症患者照料者的姑息治疗协调干预措施:一项综合综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(3):1750-1768. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14030130.
3
Feedback System Analysis of a Multicomponent Intervention on Dyads of Home-Dwelling Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Results From the LIVE@Home.Path Trial.对居家痴呆患者及其照护者二元组进行多成分干预的反馈系统分析:来自LIVE@Home.Path试验的结果
Innov Aging. 2024 Feb 23;8(3):igae020. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae020. eCollection 2024.
4
Access to, use of, and experiences with social alarms in home-living people with dementia: results from the LIVE@Home.Path trial.居家痴呆症患者使用社交警报的情况、体验及获取途径:LIVE@Home.Path试验结果
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 May 22;15:1167616. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1167616. eCollection 2023.
5
Dynamics of Interaction among Professionals, Informal Supporters, and Family Caregivers of People with Dementia along the Dementia Care Pathway: A Nationwide Survey in Japan.痴呆症照护路径中专业人员、非正式支持者和痴呆症患者家庭照顾者之间的互动动态:日本全国性调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065044.
6
Patient navigation programs for people with dementia, their caregivers, and members of the care team: a scoping review.痴呆患者及其照护者和照护团队成员的患者导航计划:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):281-325. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00024.
7
The impact of medication reviews by general practitioners on psychotropic drug use and behavioral and psychological symptoms in home-dwelling people with dementia: results from the multicomponent cluster randomized controlled LIVE@Home.Path trial.全科医生进行药物评估对居家痴呆患者精神药物使用和行为及心理症状的影响:来自多组分集群随机对照 LIVE@Home.Path 试验的结果。
BMC Med. 2022 May 26;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02382-5.
8
Factors associated with access to assistive technology and telecare in home-dwelling people with dementia: baseline data from the LIVE@Home.Path trial.与居住在家中的痴呆症患者获得辅助技术和远程保健相关的因素:来自 LIVE@Home.Path 试验的基线数据。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Sep 15;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01627-2.
9
LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.居家痴呆症患者及其照护者的临床路径创新:一项混合方法、阶梯式、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y.

本文引用的文献

1
LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.居家痴呆症患者及其照护者的临床路径创新:一项混合方法、阶梯式、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y.
2
Home-dwelling persons with dementia's perception on care support: Qualitative study.居家痴呆症患者对护理支持的感知:定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):991-1002. doi: 10.1177/0969733019893098. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Framework for Patient and Informal Caregiver Participation in Research (PAICPAIR): Part 1.患者和非正式照护者参与研究的框架(PAICPAIR):第 1 部分。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr/Jun;43(2):E58-E70. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000289.
4
Balancing the struggle to live with dementia: a systematic meta-synthesis of coping.平衡与痴呆症共存的挣扎:应对策略的系统元分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1306-9.
5
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.关系自主性:它是什么意思,以及它如何在临终关怀中使用?基于论点的伦理学文献的系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 26;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3.
6
Advance care planning in different settings for people with dementia: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.不同情境下痴呆症患者的预先医疗照护计划:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Dec;17(6):707-719. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000257.
7
"We live as good a life as we can, in the situation we're in" - the significance of the home as perceived by persons with dementia.“我们在所处的环境中尽可能地过好我们的生活”——痴呆症患者对家的看法的意义。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1171-6.
8
Agency in dementia care: systematic review and meta-ethnography.痴呆症护理中的代理:系统评价和元民族志。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):627-642. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001801. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Stakeholders perspectives on the key components of community-based interventions coordinating care in dementia: a qualitative systematic review.利益相关者对社区痴呆症协调护理干预关键组成部分的看法:一项定性系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 22;17(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2725-y.
10
Case Management for People with Dementia and its Translations: A Discussion Paper.痴呆症患者的病例管理及其翻译:一篇讨论文件。
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):951-969. doi: 10.1177/1471301217697802. Epub 2017 Mar 17.