Stucky Kirk Jeffrey, Baker Laurie N, Rush Beth K, Waldron-Perrine Brigid, Dean Pamela M, Tlustos Sarah J, Barisa Mark
Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI.
Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):604-610. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
Psychologists have been applying neurorehabilitation models of care for many years. These practitioners come from different training backgrounds and use a variety of titles to refer to themselves despite considerable overlap in practice patterns, professional identification, and salary. Titles like 'neurorehabilitation psychologist' and 'rehabilitation neuropsychologist' are sometimes used by practitioners in the field to indicate their specialty area, but are not formally recognized by the American Psychological Association, the American Board of Professional Psychology, or by training councils in clinical neuropsychology (CN) or rehabilitation psychology (RP). Neither the CN or RP specialties alone fully address or define the competencies, skill sets, and clinical experiences required to provide high quality, comprehensive neurorehabilitation psychology services across settings. Therefore, irrespective of practice setting, we believe that both clinical neuropsychologists and rehabilitation psychologists should ideally have mastery of specific, overlapping competencies and a philosophical approach to care that we call neurorehabilitation psychology in this paper. Trainees and early career professionals who aspire to practice in this arena are often pressured to prioritize either CN or RP pathways over the other, with anxiety about perceived and real potential for falling short in their training goals. In the absence of an explicit training path or formal guidelines, these professionals emerge only after the opportunity, privilege, or frank luck of working with specific mentors or in exceptional patient care settings that lend themselves to obtaining integrated competencies in neurorehabilitation psychology. This paper reflects the efforts of 7 practitioners to preliminarily define the practice and philosophies of neurorehabilitation psychology, the skill sets and competencies deemed essential for best practice, and essential training pathway elements. We propose competencies designed to maximize the integrity of training and provide clear guideposts for professional development.
多年来,心理学家一直在应用神经康复护理模式。这些从业者来自不同的培训背景,尽管在实践模式、专业认同和薪资方面存在相当大的重叠,但他们使用各种各样的头衔来称呼自己。该领域的从业者有时会使用“神经康复心理学家”和“康复神经心理学家”等头衔来表明自己的专业领域,但美国心理协会、美国专业心理学委员会、临床神经心理学(CN)或康复心理学(RP)培训委员会并未正式认可这些头衔。单独的CN或RP专业都不能完全涵盖或界定在不同环境中提供高质量、全面的神经康复心理学服务所需的能力、技能组合和临床经验。因此,无论实践环境如何,我们认为临床神经心理学家和康复心理学家理想情况下都应掌握特定的、重叠的能力以及一种护理哲学方法,在本文中我们将其称为神经康复心理学。渴望在这一领域执业的实习生和早期职业专业人员往往面临压力,需要在CN或RP路径中优先选择其一,同时担心自己在培训目标方面可能达不到预期,无论是实际还是感知到的。由于缺乏明确的培训路径或正式指南,这些专业人员只有在有幸与特定导师合作或在特殊的患者护理环境中工作时,才有机会获得神经康复心理学的综合能力,从而崭露头角。本文反映了7位从业者为初步界定神经康复心理学的实践和理念、最佳实践所需的技能组合和能力以及基本培训路径要素所做的努力。我们提出了一些能力要求,旨在最大限度地提高培训的完整性,并为专业发展提供明确的指导方针。