Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Quebec, Montreal.
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jan;83(1):47-57.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and a timely transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) after PD ends. We compared the outcomes of patients transitioning from PD to HHD with those initiating KRT with HHD.
Observational analysis of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR).
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: All patients who initiated PD or HHD within the first 90 days of KRT between 2005 and 2018.
Patients transitioning from PD to HHD (PD+HHD group) versus patients initiating KRT with HHD (HHD group).
(1) A composite of all-cause mortality and modality transfer (to in-center hemodialysis or PD for 90 days) and (2) all hospitalizations (considered as recurrent events).
A propensity score analysis for which PD+HHD patients were matched 1:1 to (1) incident HHD patients ("incident-match" analysis) or (2) HHD patients with a KRT vintage at least equivalent to the vintage of PD+HHD patients at the transition time ("vintage-matched" analysis). Cause-specific hazards models (composite outcome) and shared frailty models (hospitalization) were used to compare groups.
Among 63,327 individuals in the CORR, 163 PD+HHD patients (median of 1.9 years in PD) and 711 HHD patients were identified. In the incident-match analysis, compared to the HHD patients, the PD+HHD group had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58-1.32]) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.41]). In the vintage-match analysis, PD+HHD patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]) but a similar hospitalization risk (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59-1.24]).
Risk of survivor bias in the PD+HHD cohort and residual confounding.
Controlling for KRT vintage, the patients transitioning from PD to HHD had better clinical outcomes than the incident HHD patients. These data support the use of integrated home dialysis for patients initiating home-based KRT.
PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of dialysis with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and subsequent transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) once PD is no longer feasible. It allows patients to benefit from initial lifestyle advantages of PD and to continue home-based treatments after its termination. However, some patients may prefer to initiate dialysis with HHD from the outset. In this study, we compared the long-term clinical outcomes of both approaches using a large Canadian dialysis register. We found that both options led to a similar risk of hospitalization. In contrast, the PD-to-HHD model led to improved survival when controlling for the duration of kidney failure.
综合家庭透析模式建议在开始肾脏替代治疗(KRT)时采用腹膜透析(PD),并在 PD 结束后及时过渡到家庭血液透析(HHD)。我们比较了从 PD 过渡到 HHD 的患者与直接开始 HHD 的患者的结局。
加拿大器官替代登记处(CORR)的观察性分析。
2005 年至 2018 年期间,在 KRT 开始后的 90 天内开始 PD 或 HHD 的所有患者。
从 PD 过渡到 HHD 的患者(PD+HHD 组)与直接开始 HHD 的患者(HHD 组)。
(1)全因死亡和治疗方式转换(90 天内转为中心血液透析或 PD)的复合结局,以及(2)所有住院治疗(视为复发性事件)。
使用倾向评分分析,将 PD+HHD 患者与(1)新发 HHD 患者(“新发匹配”分析)或(2)KRT 起始时间与 PD+HHD 患者转换时间相当的 HHD 患者(“起始时间匹配”分析)进行 1:1 匹配。使用特定原因风险模型(复合结局)和共享脆弱性模型(住院治疗)比较组间差异。
在 CORR 中,共纳入 63327 名患者,其中 163 名 PD+HHD 患者(PD 中位治疗时间为 1.9 年)和 711 名 HHD 患者。在新发匹配分析中,与 HHD 患者相比,PD+HHD 组的复合结局风险(HR,0.88 [95%CI,0.58-1.32])和住院风险(HR,1.04 [95%CI,0.76-1.41])相似。在起始时间匹配分析中,PD+HHD 患者的复合结局风险较低(HR,0.61 [95%CI,0.40-0.94]),但住院风险相似(HR,0.85 [95%CI,0.59-1.24])。
PD+HHD 队列存在幸存者偏倚风险,且存在残余混杂因素。
在控制 KRT 起始时间的情况下,从 PD 过渡到 HHD 的患者的临床结局优于新发 HHD 患者。这些数据支持为起始家庭 KRT 的患者使用综合家庭透析方案。
综合家庭透析模式建议在开始透析时采用腹膜透析(PD),一旦 PD 不再可行,随后过渡到家庭血液透析(HHD)。这种模式允许患者从 PD 的初始生活方式优势中受益,并在其结束后继续接受家庭治疗。然而,一些患者可能更愿意从一开始就选择 HHD 进行治疗。在这项研究中,我们使用加拿大的一个大型透析登记处,比较了这两种方法的长期临床结局。我们发现,这两种方案的住院风险相似。相比之下,PD 到 HHD 的治疗模式在控制肾功能衰竭持续时间的情况下,可以提高生存率。