Suppr超能文献

加拿大腹膜透析和居家血液透析患者技术生存率的比较。

A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):1941-1949. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz075.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD.

METHODS

Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.

摘要

背景

高退出率仍然是居家血液透析(HHD)和腹膜透析(PD)面临的挑战。我们比较了加拿大接受 HHD 和 PD 的患者之间的技术失败风险。

方法

利用加拿大器官替代登记处,我们研究了 2000 年至 2012 年期间开始透析后 1 年内开始接受 HHD 或 PD 的成年患者,随访至 2013 年 12 月 31 日。技术失败定义为接受任何替代模式治疗≥60 天。使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险模型比较 HHD 和 PD 之间的技术生存情况。我们还检查了技术生存的时间依赖性、患者特征与技术失败的关系以及技术失败的原因。

结果

2000 年至 2012 年,15314 名患者在开始透析后 1 年内接受了居家透析治疗:14461 名接受 PD 治疗,853 名接受 HHD 治疗。两种居家治疗模式的技术失败率在治疗的第一年最高。在整个随访期间,HHD 的技术失败率低于 PD(调整后的危险比=0.79;95%置信区间 0.69-0.90)。然而,相对技术失败风险并非随时间成比例增加,HHD 与 PD 相比的有益关联仅在透析开始后的第一年显现。比较结果在亚组之间也有所不同,并且近年来以及在老年患者中,HHD 相对于 PD 的技术生存优势不太明显。技术失败的预测因素在两种模式之间也不同。虽然肥胖、吸烟和小设施规模与 PD 和 HHD 中的技术失败率较高有关,但与年龄和性别有关的因素不同。此外,大多数 PD 患者的停用是出于医疗原因(38%),而大多数 HHD 患者的停用是由于社会原因或资源不足(50%)。

结论

在这项加拿大居家透析患者研究中,HHD 与 PD 相比,技术生存情况更好。然而,这些模式之间的技术失败模式存在显著差异。需要制定策略来提高所有居家透析模式的患者保留率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验