Positive Rhetoric LLC, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.
River City Pulmonology, Baptist Health System, San Antonio, Texas, USA; Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2023 Nov;23(11):1793-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
With stakeholder focus on the United States organ procurement system, there is a need for tools that permit comparative assessment of organ procurement providers. We developed a public-facing dashboard for organ procurement organizations (OPOs), using data from multiple sources, to create an online, readily accessible visualization of OPO practice conditions and performance for the period 2010-2020. With this tool, OPOs can be compared on the CMS metric of donors procured per 100 donation-consistent deaths, as well as donation after circulatory death procurement, procurement of older and minority patient populations, procurement in smaller hospitals, and procurement of patients without a significant drug history. Patterns of higher performance were identified, and 74% of differences in overall donor procurement rates could be explained using model variables. Procurement differences were affected to a greater and more reproducible degree by OPO performance among Black and non-White patient populations, as well as in smaller hospitals, than by donation service area characteristics. Dashboards such as ours support OPOs and stakeholders in quality improvement actions, through leveraging benchmarked performance data among organ procurement clinical providers.
由于利益相关者关注的是美国器官获取系统,因此需要有工具来对器官获取机构进行比较评估。我们使用来自多个来源的数据,为器官获取组织 (OPO) 开发了一个面向公众的仪表板,以便在 2010 年至 2020 年期间创建 OPO 实践条件和绩效的在线、易于访问的可视化效果。通过这个工具,OPO 可以在 CMS 指标(每 100 例与捐赠相关的死亡中获取的捐赠者数量)以及死后循环死亡获取、获取老年和少数族裔患者人群、在较小的医院获取以及获取没有显著药物史的患者方面进行比较。确定了更高性能的模式,并且可以使用模型变量解释 74%的总供体采购率差异。采购差异受 OPO 在黑人和非白人患者人群以及较小医院中的表现的影响更大且更具可重复性,而不是受捐赠服务区特征的影响。像我们这样的仪表板通过利用器官获取临床提供者之间的基准绩效数据,支持 OPO 和利益相关者进行质量改进行动。