• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What is visible is fixable: Visual dashboards for multi-domain assessment of organ procurement organization performance.可见即可修复:用于评估器官获取组织绩效的多领域可视化仪表板。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Nov;23(11):1793-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.国家器官捐献率和器官获取组织指标评估。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):173-180. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5395.
3
Procurement characteristics of high- and low-performing OPOs as seen in OPTN/SRTR data.在器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)/器官共享联合网络(SRTR)数据中呈现的高绩效和低绩效器官获取组织(OPO)的采购特征。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Feb;22(2):455-463. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16832. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Changing Metrics of Organ Procurement Organization Performance in Order to Increase Organ Donation Rates in the United States.改变器官获取组织绩效指标,以提高美国的器官捐赠率。
Am J Transplant. 2017 Dec;17(12):3183-3192. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14391. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Rapid improvement in organ procurement organization performance: Potential for change and impact of new leadership.器官获取组织绩效的快速提升:变革潜力与新领导的影响
Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec;20(12):3567-3573. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16085. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
6
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' proposed metrics for recertification of organ procurement organizations: Evaluation by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)提议的器官获取组织重新认证指标:移植受者科学登记处(Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients)的评估。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2466-2480. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15842. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
7
Importance of incorporating standardized, verifiable, objective metrics of organ procurement organization performance into discussions about organ allocation.将器官获取组织绩效的标准化、可核实、客观指标纳入器官分配讨论的重要性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):2973-2978. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15492. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Population Characteristics and Organ Procurement Organization Performance Metrics.人口特征和器官获取组织绩效指标。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336749. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36749.
9
Using a standardized donor ratio to assess the performance of organ procurement organizations.使用标准化供体比例评估器官获取组织的绩效。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1329-44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00212.
10
Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.器官获取组织(OPO),最佳实践。
Clin Transplant. 2001;15 Suppl 6:16-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.00003.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing health care disparities in US organ procurement organizations.评估美国器官获取组织中的医疗保健差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01808-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Procurement characteristics of high- and low-performing OPOs as seen in OPTN/SRTR data.在器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)/器官共享联合网络(SRTR)数据中呈现的高绩效和低绩效器官获取组织(OPO)的采购特征。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Feb;22(2):455-463. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16832. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
OPO performance improvement and increasing organ transplantation: Metrics are necessary but not sufficient.器官获取组织(OPO)绩效提升与器官移植增加:指标虽有必要但并不充分。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jul;21(7):2325-2326. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16545. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
Examination of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Deceased Organ Donation Ratio Over Time in the US.考察美国在过去一段时间内,器官捐献率的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Apr 1;156(4):e207083. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7083. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Public discourse and policy change: Absence of harm from increased oversight and transparency in OPO performance.公众舆论与政策变革:OPO 绩效监督与透明度的提高并不会造成危害
Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2646-2652. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16527. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
6
Results of a data-driven performance improvement initiative in organ donation.器官捐献数据驱动绩效改进计划的结果。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jul;21(7):2555-2562. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16442. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Response to: Deceased donors: Defining drug-related deaths.回应:已故捐赠者:界定与药物相关的死亡。
Clin Transplant. 2020 May;34(5):e13828. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13828. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Improvements in organ donation: Riding the coattails of a national tragedy.器官捐献的改进:乘着国家悲剧的东风。
Clin Transplant. 2020 Jan;34(1):e13755. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13755. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Improving OPO performance through national data availability.通过全国数据可用性提高器官获取组织(OPO)的绩效。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Oct;19(10):2675-2677. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15508. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Importance of incorporating standardized, verifiable, objective metrics of organ procurement organization performance into discussions about organ allocation.将器官获取组织绩效的标准化、可核实、客观指标纳入器官分配讨论的重要性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):2973-2978. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15492. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

可见即可修复:用于评估器官获取组织绩效的多领域可视化仪表板。

What is visible is fixable: Visual dashboards for multi-domain assessment of organ procurement organization performance.

机构信息

Positive Rhetoric LLC, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.

River City Pulmonology, Baptist Health System, San Antonio, Texas, USA; Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2023 Nov;23(11):1793-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.020
PMID:37657653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11082780/
Abstract

With stakeholder focus on the United States organ procurement system, there is a need for tools that permit comparative assessment of organ procurement providers. We developed a public-facing dashboard for organ procurement organizations (OPOs), using data from multiple sources, to create an online, readily accessible visualization of OPO practice conditions and performance for the period 2010-2020. With this tool, OPOs can be compared on the CMS metric of donors procured per 100 donation-consistent deaths, as well as donation after circulatory death procurement, procurement of older and minority patient populations, procurement in smaller hospitals, and procurement of patients without a significant drug history. Patterns of higher performance were identified, and 74% of differences in overall donor procurement rates could be explained using model variables. Procurement differences were affected to a greater and more reproducible degree by OPO performance among Black and non-White patient populations, as well as in smaller hospitals, than by donation service area characteristics. Dashboards such as ours support OPOs and stakeholders in quality improvement actions, through leveraging benchmarked performance data among organ procurement clinical providers.

摘要

由于利益相关者关注的是美国器官获取系统,因此需要有工具来对器官获取机构进行比较评估。我们使用来自多个来源的数据,为器官获取组织 (OPO) 开发了一个面向公众的仪表板,以便在 2010 年至 2020 年期间创建 OPO 实践条件和绩效的在线、易于访问的可视化效果。通过这个工具,OPO 可以在 CMS 指标(每 100 例与捐赠相关的死亡中获取的捐赠者数量)以及死后循环死亡获取、获取老年和少数族裔患者人群、在较小的医院获取以及获取没有显著药物史的患者方面进行比较。确定了更高性能的模式,并且可以使用模型变量解释 74%的总供体采购率差异。采购差异受 OPO 在黑人和非白人患者人群以及较小医院中的表现的影响更大且更具可重复性,而不是受捐赠服务区特征的影响。像我们这样的仪表板通过利用器官获取临床提供者之间的基准绩效数据,支持 OPO 和利益相关者进行质量改进行动。