Strunz F
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1986;32(3):249-71.
The author gives a brief survey on psychophysiological correlational dream studies since 1953. Early optimism of physiologists and psychoanalysts on the possibility of building bridges between psyche and soma that could further the understanding of the dream over and above the psychoanalytic contributions has largely given way to more sober considerations. The subjective side of dreams and their importance for therapeutic and maturational processes has never been the subject of psychophysiologic investigation. Its objectives did not go beyond mere correlational studies of physiological events and dream content categories. Reductionist theories of certain neurophysiologists that conceive of the dream as an epiphenomenon of physiologic arousal were followed by some psychoanalysts' reconceptualization of oniric understanding. Psychological and physiological levels of interpretation must, for lack of a superordinate framework, be strictly kept apart. Psychophysiologic dream studies have, on the whole, added little to the understanding of the dream as a significant mental product of clinical importance.
作者对1953年以来的心理生理相关梦境研究进行了简要概述。生理学家和精神分析学家早期对在心理与躯体之间架起桥梁的可能性抱有的乐观态度,认为这可能会在精神分析贡献之外进一步加深对梦的理解,但如今这种乐观态度在很大程度上已让位于更为审慎的思考。梦的主观方面及其对治疗和成熟过程的重要性从未成为心理生理研究的主题。其目标仅仅局限于生理事件与梦境内容类别之间的相关性研究。某些神经生理学家的还原论理论将梦视为生理唤醒的一种附带现象,随后一些精神分析学家对梦的理解进行了重新概念化。由于缺乏一个上级框架,心理层面和生理层面的解释必须严格区分开来。总体而言,心理生理梦境研究在将梦理解为具有临床重要性的显著心理产物方面几乎没有增添什么内容。