Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2024 May;22(2):458-464. doi: 10.1111/idh.12732. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
To simulate the abrasive potential of an interdental brush when applied with toothpastes and prophylactic gels/solutions in a novel laboratory brushing simulation set-up.
A brushing device was customized to treat dentin samples mimicking a simplified interdental space with an interdental brush (ISO 2). The brushing, that is, 7200 strokes for 1 h, was performed with artificial saliva (control), a povidone-iodine solution, and slurries of chlorhexidine and fluoride gels as well as three toothpastes with different RDA values ranging from 29 to 100, respectively. The loss of dentin was profilometrically assessed and compared with ANOVA and Fishers LSD.
While artificial saliva as control, the solution and the gel slurries showed no measurable dentin loss, toothpastes resulted in a measurable linear surface damage with respect to the actual intrinsic RDA values and ranged from 12.6 to 26.5 μm (p < 0.001).
Any interdental cleaning product should be tailored and carefully instructed. Any over- and misuse should be avoided, which applies especially to the use of interdental brushes in combination with abrasive toothpastes.
在一种新颖的实验室刷牙模拟装置中,模拟当使用牙膏和预防性凝胶/溶液时,牙间刷的研磨潜力。
定制了一种刷牙设备,用于处理模仿简化牙间隙的牙本质样本,使用牙间刷(ISO 2)。刷牙,即 1 小时内进行 7200 次刷洗,使用人工唾液(对照)、聚维酮碘溶液以及洗必泰凝胶和氟化物凝胶的浆料进行,三种牙膏的 RDA 值分别为 29 至 100。使用轮廓仪评估牙本质的损失,并使用 ANOVA 和 Fishers LSD 进行比较。
作为对照的人工唾液、溶液和凝胶浆料没有可测量的牙本质损失,而牙膏则导致了可测量的线性表面损伤,与实际的固有 RDA 值相关,范围为 12.6 至 26.5μm(p<0.001)。
任何牙间清洁产品都应进行调整并谨慎使用。应避免过度使用和错误使用,这尤其适用于将牙间刷与研磨性牙膏一起使用的情况。