Suppr超能文献

活性炭牙膏不会增加牙齿的酸蚀磨损。

Activated charcoal toothpastes do not increase erosive tooth wear.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 2227 Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue, 05508-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Dent. 2021 Jun;109:103677. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103677. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of activated charcoal toothpastes on enamel and dentin erosive wear.

METHODS

Ninety enamel and dentin slabs were randomly distributed into 9 experimental groups (n = 10/substrate): Artificial saliva (negative control); Elmex Caries (EXC - 1400 ppm F as AmF, reference toothpaste without charcoal); Colgate Luminous White Activated Charcoal (CLW - 1000 ppm F as MFP); Colgate Natural Extracts (CNE - 1450 ppm F- as NaF); Oral-B 3D White Mineral Clean (OMC - 1100 ppm F as NaF); Curaprox Black is White (CBW - 950 ppm F as MFP); Bianco Carbon (BIC - no F); Natural Suavetex (NSX - no F); Oralgen Nupearl Advanced (ONA - no F). Specimens were submitted to a 5-day erosion-toothbrushing abrasion cycling. Surface loss (SL) was determined with an optical profilometer. pH and concentration of available fluoride in the slurries were also assessed. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

For both substrates, CBW, CNE and EXC had significantly lower SL values than the control. CLW and OMC promoted significantly less dentin wear than the control. All the other groups did not differ significantly from the control. There was a strong negative correlation between SL and concentration of fluoride in the slurries for enamel (r = -0.77) and dentin (r = -0.91), and a strong positive correlation (r = 0.77) between enamel SL and pH.

CONCLUSIONS

For both substrates, none of the activated charcoal-based toothpastes resulted in higher SL than brushing with artificial saliva. Only two of the charcoal toothpastes and the reference toothpaste were able to provide further protection against SL.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Activated charcoal-containing toothpastes are becoming popular, despite the absence of evidence supporting their safety for use by individuals with erosive tooth wear. These products did not pose an additional risk for these subjects. However, it would be preferable to use products that exhibits further protective effect.

摘要

目的

评估活性炭牙膏对牙釉质和牙本质腐蚀性磨损的影响。

方法

将 90 个牙釉质和牙本质板随机分为 9 个实验组(n=10/底物):人工唾液(阴性对照);Elmex 龋齿(EXC-1400ppm F 作为 AmF,不含活性炭的参考牙膏);高露洁亮白净色活性炭(CLW-1000ppm F 作为 MFP);高露洁天然提取物(CNE-1450ppm F-作为 NaF);Oral-B 3D 美白矿物清洁(OMC-1100ppm F 作为 NaF);Curaprox 黑即白(CBW-950ppm F 作为 MFP);Bianco Carbon(BIC-无 F);天然 Suavetex(NSX-无 F);Oralgen Nupearl Advanced(ONA-无 F)。标本进行为期 5 天的侵蚀-刷牙磨损循环。用光学轮廓仪测定表面损失(SL)。还评估了浆液中 pH 值和可用氟化物的浓度。数据进行了统计学分析(α=0.05)。

结果

对于两种底物,CBW、CNE 和 EXC 的 SL 值均明显低于对照组。CLW 和 OMC 引起的牙本质磨损明显少于对照组。其他组与对照组无显著差异。牙釉质(r=-0.77)和牙本质(r=-0.91)中 SL 与浆液中氟化物浓度之间存在强负相关,牙釉质 SL 与 pH 值之间存在强正相关(r=0.77)。

结论

对于两种底物,没有一种基于活性炭的牙膏的 SL 值高于用人工唾液刷牙。只有两种活性炭牙膏和参考牙膏能够提供对 SL 的进一步保护。

临床意义

尽管没有证据支持有腐蚀性牙齿磨损的个体使用含活性炭的牙膏的安全性,但含有活性炭的牙膏越来越受欢迎。这些产品对这些患者没有带来额外的风险。然而,最好使用具有进一步保护作用的产品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验