• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自单一制造商的现代后稳定型股骨假体无菌性松动发生率高。

High Rates of Aseptic Loosening in Modern Posterior-stabilized Femoral Components From a Single Manufacturer.

作者信息

Shnaekel Asa, Morrison J Craig

机构信息

Southern Joint Replacement Institute, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2023 Jun 12;22:101132. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101132. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101132
PMID:37663071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10472140/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States. There are concerns and reports of early aseptic loosening due to debonding at the cement-implant interface in a specific posterior-stabilized femoral design. This study describes failure at the cement-implant interface with 2 femoral implant designs produced by a single manufacturer.

METHODS

This is a review of failed primary total knee arthroplasties performed with Optetrak Logic and Truliant posterior-stabilized femoral components between 2010 and 2020. Cases with revision surgery performed for femoral component loosening were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 896 knees were revised for femoral component loosening. The mean time from index arthroplasty to revision was 73 months. Patients presented with knee pain and recurrent aseptic effusions. More than half of patients had no evidence of component loosening on plain radiographs. Bone scans were positive in 77% of patients with loosening. Femoral components were easily disimpacted from the cement mantle at the time of revision surgery. Patients were treated with femoral only revision or femoral and tibial revision. Two complications occurred in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers should maintain vigilance in the surveillance of patients with these implants. Clinicians should have a low threshold for additional diagnostic testing if these patients develop pain and/or recurrent effusions. Isolated femoral or complete revision both seem to be acceptable treatment strategies for this failure mechanism.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是美国最常实施的外科手术之一。对于一种特定的后稳定型股骨设计,存在因骨水泥 - 植入物界面脱粘导致早期无菌性松动的担忧及相关报道。本研究描述了由单一制造商生产的两种股骨植入物设计在骨水泥 - 植入物界面处的失效情况。

方法

这是一项对2010年至2020年间使用Optetrak Logic和Truliant后稳定型股骨组件进行的初次全膝关节置换术失败病例的回顾。对因股骨组件松动而进行翻修手术的病例进行了审查。

结果

896例膝关节中有17例因股骨组件松动而进行翻修。从初次置换到翻修的平均时间为73个月。患者表现为膝关节疼痛和反复出现无菌性积液。超过一半的患者在X线平片上没有组件松动的迹象。77%的松动患者骨扫描呈阳性。在翻修手术时,股骨组件很容易从骨水泥壳中取出。患者接受了仅股骨翻修或股骨和胫骨翻修治疗。本系列发生了2例并发症。

结论

医疗人员应对使用这些植入物的患者保持警惕。如果这些患者出现疼痛和/或反复积液,临床医生应降低额外诊断测试的阈值。对于这种失效机制,单纯股骨翻修或完全翻修似乎都是可接受的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/0259e9d0bbae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/ab495e740842/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/c7fd7545b5b7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/e23095386c3c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/0259e9d0bbae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/ab495e740842/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/c7fd7545b5b7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/e23095386c3c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8659/10472140/0259e9d0bbae/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
High Rates of Aseptic Loosening in Modern Posterior-stabilized Femoral Components From a Single Manufacturer.来自单一制造商的现代后稳定型股骨假体无菌性松动发生率高。
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Jun 12;22:101132. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101132. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Early Aseptic Loosening with Increased Presence and Severity of Backside Burnishing in the Optetrak Logic Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component.Optetrak Logic 后稳定型全膝关节置换股骨组件中背面抛光存在和严重程度增加导致早期无菌性松动。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Dec;35(14):1595-1603. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729549. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement : a follow-up review.一种常见膝关节置换术中胫骨脱粘和失败的高发生率:一项随访综述。
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jun;3(6):495-501. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.36.BJO-2022-0043.R1.
4
Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中失败的非骨水泥型股骨假体的骨水泥翻修术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1264-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00012.
5
Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA.全膝关节置换术后股骨组件内翻错位与胫骨无菌性松动有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):400-407. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000012.
6
Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.采用改良骨水泥技术的Charnley全髋关节置换术。至少随访十五年后的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan;79(1):53-64.
7
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
8
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
9
Fluoroscopically Assisted Radiographs Improve Sensitivity of Detecting Loose Tibial Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.透视辅助X线片可提高翻修全膝关节置换术中检测胫骨假体松动的敏感性。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
[Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].[因无菌性松动行膝关节翻修置换术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):5-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Fellows.研究员;伙伴们;同事们 (具体含义需根据上下文确定)
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Aug 14;22:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101210. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
No Difference in Revision Rate Between Low Viscosity and High Viscosity Cement Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术中使用低黏度和高黏度骨水泥的翻修率无差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Oct;37(10):2025-2034. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.043. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Early Aseptic Loosening with Increased Presence and Severity of Backside Burnishing in the Optetrak Logic Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component.Optetrak Logic 后稳定型全膝关节置换股骨组件中背面抛光存在和严重程度增加导致早期无菌性松动。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Dec;35(14):1595-1603. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729549. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
High-Viscosity Versus a Lower-Viscosity Cement Penetration at Dough Phase In Vivo in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
在初次全膝关节置换术中面团期体内高黏度与低黏度骨水泥渗透的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1995-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
The Association Between Cement Viscosity and Revision Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.水泥粘度与初次全膝关节置换术后翻修风险的关系。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1987-1994. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Utility and Prognostic Ability of a Diagnostic Injection Before Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.诊断性注射在翻修全膝关节置换术前的应用及预后能力。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2116-2120. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.056. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening.采用高黏度骨水泥行初次全膝关节置换术与无菌性松动翻修的风险增加相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S182-S189. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty.疼痛性全膝关节置换术的评估。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct 15;27(20):743-751. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00083.
8
Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020-2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample.美国全关节置换术的比率:利用国家住院患者样本对 2020-2040 年的未来预测。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Trends in the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.美国初次全膝关节置换术患者中高黏度骨水泥使用趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3460-3464. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全膝关节置换术的当前流行病学。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.066. Epub 2017 Apr 6.