• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性下颈椎骨折脱位手术时机及术前生理参数作为手术结果的临床预测指标

Timing of Surgery and Pre-operative Physiological Parameters as Clinical Predictors of Surgical Outcomes in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations.

作者信息

Khanna Aman, Menon Hari, Chaudhary Vijay, Sidhdhapuria Pratik, Patel Kandarp, Narang Chandan

机构信息

Ortopedista e Traumatologista, Departamento de Ortopedia, New Civil Hospital Surat, Gujarat, Índia.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Aug 30;58(4):e586-e591. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772240. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1772240
PMID:37663183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10468239/
Abstract

To evaluate the risk factors and outcomes in patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical spine injuries with respect of the timing of surgery and preoperative physiological parameters of the patient.  26 patients with sub-axial cervical spine fractures and dislocations were enrolled. Demographic data of patients, appropriate radiological investigation, and physiological parameters like respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2 and ASIA impairment scale were documented. They were divided pre-operatively into 2 groups. Group U with patients having abnormal physiological parameters and Group S including patients having physiological parameters within normal range. They were further subdivided into early and late groups according to the timing of surgery as U , U S and S . All the patients were called for follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months.  56 percent of patients in Group S had neurological improvement by one ASIA grade and a good outcome irrespective of the timing of surgery. Patients in Group U having unstable physiological parameters and undergoing early surgical intervention had poor outcomes.  This study concludes that early surgical intervention in physiologically unstable patients had a strong association as a risk factor in the final outcome of the patients in terms of mortality and morbidity. Also, no positive association of improvement in physiologically stable patients with respect to the timing of surgery could be established.

摘要

为了根据手术时机和患者术前生理参数,评估接受下颈椎损伤手术治疗患者的风险因素及预后。纳入26例下颈椎骨折脱位患者。记录患者的人口统计学数据、适当的影像学检查结果以及呼吸频率、血压、心率、动脉血氧分压和美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤分级等生理参数。术前将他们分为两组。U组患者生理参数异常,S组患者生理参数在正常范围内。根据手术时机,他们进一步细分为早期组和晚期组,即U早、U晚、S早和S晚。所有患者在术后1个月、6个月和12个月进行随访。S组56%的患者神经功能改善1个ASIA等级,且无论手术时机如何,预后良好。生理参数不稳定且接受早期手术干预的U组患者预后较差。本研究得出结论,对于生理不稳定的患者,早期手术干预作为危险因素与患者最终的死亡率和发病率密切相关。此外,对于生理稳定的患者,无法确定手术时机与改善情况之间存在正相关。

相似文献

1
Timing of Surgery and Pre-operative Physiological Parameters as Clinical Predictors of Surgical Outcomes in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations.创伤性下颈椎骨折脱位手术时机及术前生理参数作为手术结果的临床预测指标
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Aug 30;58(4):e586-e591. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772240. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
[Unstable injuries to the upper cervical spine in children and adolescents].[儿童和青少年上颈椎的不稳定损伤]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(2):106-13.
3
Surgical options in the treatment of subaxial cervical fractures: a retrospective cohort study.下颈椎骨折治疗中的手术选择:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;115(8):1420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
4
Complications and long-term outcomes after open surgery for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures: a consecutive series of 303 patients.创伤性下颈椎骨折开放手术后的并发症及长期预后:303例连续病例系列研究
BMC Surg. 2016 Aug 15;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0172-z.
5
Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: application of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spinal injury classification system to guide surgical timing.创伤性颈脊髓损伤的早期与延迟减压:应用 AOSpine 下颈椎损伤分类系统指导手术时机。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Aug;28(8):1855-1863. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05959-6. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Evolution of patient-reported outcome measures, 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery for subaxial cervical spine fractures, a nation-wide registry study.下颈椎骨折手术后 1、2、5 年患者报告结局测量指标的演变:一项全国注册研究。
Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1182-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
7
Anterior Cervical Reduction Decompression Fusion With Plating for Management of Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Dislocations.前路颈椎复位减压融合钢板内固定术治疗创伤性下颈椎脱位
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(3):312-320. doi: 10.1177/2192568220903741. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Cervical spine injury from gunshot wounds.颈椎枪伤
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):442-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13522. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
9
Is only Anterior Stabilization Enough in Three-Column Injury of Subaxial Cervical Spine? - A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis of 78 Patients.下颈椎三柱损伤仅行前路稳定术是否足够?——78例患者的长期回顾性分析
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Sep 14;16(3):512-517. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_518_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
10
Outcomes of Unstable Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Managed by Posteroanterior Stabilization and Fusion.经前后路稳定与融合治疗的下颈椎不稳定骨折的疗效
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):416-422. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.416. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
SURGICAL DELAY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBAXIAL FRACTURE.下颈椎骨折患者的手术延迟
Acta Ortop Bras. 2025 Aug 18;33(3):e289304. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220253303e289304. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Window of opportunity for surgical decompression in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.急性创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者手术减压的时机窗
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Dec 27;32(5):633-641. doi: 10.3171/2019.10.SPINE19888. Print 2020 May 1.
2
The case for the future role of evidence-based medicine in the management of cervical spine injuries, with or without fractures.在管理颈椎损伤(伴或不伴骨折)方面,基于证据的医学的未来作用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Oct 1;31(4):457-463. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19652.
3
Review of Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries Presenting to a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Nepal: Challenges in Surgical Management in a Third World Scenario.尼泊尔一家三级医院收治的下颈椎损伤病例回顾:第三世界背景下手术治疗面临的挑战
Global Spine J. 2019 Oct;9(7):713-716. doi: 10.1177/2192568219833049. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Efficacy of Ultra-Early (< 12 h), Early (12-24 h), and Late (>24-138.5 h) Surgery with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Confirmed Decompression in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A, B, and C Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.超早期(<12 小时)、早期(12-24 小时)和晚期(>24-138.5 小时)行 MRI 证实减压术治疗美国脊柱损伤协会损伤分级 A、B 和 C 的颈椎脊髓损伤的疗效。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Feb 1;37(3):448-457. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6606. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocation After Surgical Treatment: A CONSORT Study.颈椎后路手术治疗下颈椎骨折脱位伴颈脊髓损伤预后不良的危险因素:CONSORT 研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Mar 16;25:1970-1975. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915700.
6
Early Surgical Decompression Improves Neurological Outcome after Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis.早期手术减压对完全性创伤性颈脊髓损伤后神经功能预后的改善:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Mar 19;36(6):835-844. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5974. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Extent of Spinal Cord Decompression in Motor Complete (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A and B) Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Post-Operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Standard Operative Approaches.脊髓减压程度在运动完全性(美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级 A 和 B)创伤性脊髓损伤患者中的作用:标准手术入路的术后磁共振成像分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Mar 19;36(6):862-876. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5834. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Short-Term Outcome in Subaxial Spine Injury Patients Operated on in a Resource-Limited Setting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴资源有限环境下接受手术的下颈椎脊柱损伤患者的短期预后
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e702-e706. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.129. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
Management of Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injuries.下颈椎损伤的管理
Indian J Orthop. 2017 Nov-Dec;51(6):633-652. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_192_16.
10
Incidence and Natural Progression of Neurogenic Shock after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性脊髓损伤后神经源性休克的发生率和自然病程。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Feb 1;35(3):461-466. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4947. Epub 2017 Dec 18.