Hamamoto Yumi, Honda Akio, Miura Naoki, Tanabe-Ishibashi Azumi, Oba Kentaro, Ishibashi Ryo, Sugiura Motoaki
Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Department of Human Brain Science, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 18;14:1230192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230192. eCollection 2023.
The COVID-19 pandemic required people to adapt rapidly to the digital transformation of society for social survival, which highlighted the divide between those who can and cannot digitalize. Previous studies investigated factors promoting adaptation to digitalization; however, outcomes from adaptation to a digitalized society have not been sorted into a parsimonious model, even though there should be several multifaceted outcomes (e.g., usefulness, economic profit, and social outcome), each of which is promoted by different factors. If the effects of individual background factors can be revealed, including the technical-environment and survival-relevant personality in relation to each outcome, it would help in the creation of a society where more people play an active role by adapting to digitalization. This study aimed to construct such a model by identifying major outcomes gained in a digitalized society and investigating individual factors that contribute to the degree of gain of each of these outcomes. Five dimensions were identified by online surveys and factor analysis: Socialization (outcomes derived from new social connections created online), Space-time (freedom from time and space constraints), Economics (monetary outcome by using digital services), and Information (ease and amount of acquisition of information) were the positive outcomes, whereas Loneliness (feelings of not being able to keep up with digitization) was identified as a negative outcome. We determined that technical-environmental factors (e.g., familiarity with digital techniques and the amount of money that can be used for digitalization) facilitated gain in four positive outcomes. Notably, leadership and conscientiousness facilitated the Socialization gain while etiquette suppressed it. These factors' effects would reflect the importance of a personality trait prioritizing construction and maintenance of social relationships. This study implies that material outcomes (i.e., Space-time, Economics, and Information) are promoted by technical-environmental support, whereas social outcomes may additionally require motivation and a positive attitude for purposeful social engagement.
新冠疫情要求人们为了社会生存迅速适应社会的数字化转型,这凸显了能实现数字化与不能实现数字化的人群之间的差异。以往的研究调查了促进数字化适应的因素;然而,尽管数字化社会的适应结果应该有几个多方面的成果(如有用性、经济收益和社会成果),且每个成果由不同因素推动,但对数字化社会适应的结果尚未被整理成一个简洁的模型。如果能够揭示个体背景因素的影响,包括与每个结果相关的技术环境和与生存相关的个性,将有助于创建一个更多人通过适应数字化发挥积极作用的社会。本研究旨在通过识别在数字化社会中获得的主要成果,并调查促成这些成果获得程度的个体因素来构建这样一个模型。通过在线调查和因素分析确定了五个维度:社交化(源自在线创建的新社会联系的成果)、时空(不受时间和空间限制)、经济(使用数字服务的货币成果)和信息(获取信息的便利性和数量)是积极成果,而孤独感(跟不上数字化的感觉)被确定为消极成果。我们确定技术环境因素(如对数字技术的熟悉程度和可用于数字化的资金量)促进了四个积极成果的获得。值得注意的是,领导力和尽责性促进了社交化成果的获得,而礼仪则起到了抑制作用。这些因素的影响将反映出优先考虑社会关系构建和维护的个性特质的重要性。本研究表明,物质成果(即时空、经济和信息)由技术环境支持推动,而社会成果可能还需要有目的的社会参与的动机和积极态度。