International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258325. eCollection 2021.
Self-aid and mutual assistance among victims are critical for resolving difficulties in the immediate aftermath of a disaster, but individual facilitative factors for such resolution processes are poorly understood. To identify such individual factors in the background (i.e., disaster damage and demographic) and personality domains considering different types of difficulty and resolution, we analyzed survey data collected in the 3-year aftermath of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. We first identified major types of difficulty using a cluster analysis of 18 difficulty domains and then explored individual factors that facilitated six types of resolution (self-help, request for help, help from family, help from an acquaintance, help through cooperation, and public assistance) of these difficulty types. We identified general life difficulties and medico-psychological difficulties as two broad types of difficulty; disaster damage contributed to both types, while some personality factors (e.g., neuroticism) exacerbated the latter. Disaster damage hampered self-resolution and forced a reliance on resolution through cooperation or public assistance. On the other hand, some demographic factors, such as being young and living in a three-generation household, facilitated resolution thorough the family. Several personality factors facilitated different types of resolution, primarily of general life difficulties; the problem-solving factor facilitated self-resolution, altruism, or stubbornness resolutions through requests, leadership resolution through acquaintance, and emotion-regulation resolution through public assistance. Our findings are the first to demonstrate the involvement of different individual, particularly personality, factors in survival in the complex social dynamics of this disaster stage. They may contribute to disaster risk mitigation, allowing sophisticated risk evaluation and community resilience building.
在灾难发生后的紧急情况下,受害者的自救和互助对于解决困难至关重要,但对于这种解决过程的个体促进因素却知之甚少。为了在背景(即灾难破坏和人口统计学)和个性领域中识别这种个体因素,考虑到不同类型的困难和解决方式,我们分析了在 2011 年日本东部大地震和海啸发生后的 3 年中收集的调查数据。我们首先使用 18 个困难领域的聚类分析来确定主要的困难类型,然后探讨了促进这 6 种困难类型的解决方式(自助、求助、家庭求助、熟人求助、合作帮助和公共援助)的个体因素。我们确定了一般生活困难和医学心理困难作为两种广泛的困难类型;灾难破坏对这两种类型都有影响,而一些个性因素(如神经质)则加剧了后者。灾难破坏阻碍了自我解决,迫使人们依赖合作或公共援助来解决问题。另一方面,一些人口统计学因素,如年轻和三代同堂,促进了通过家庭来解决问题。一些个性因素促进了不同类型的解决方式,主要是一般生活困难;解决问题的因素促进了自我解决、通过请求来促进利他主义或固执己见的解决方式、通过熟人来促进领导能力的解决方式、通过公共援助来促进情绪调节的解决方式。我们的发现首次证明了不同的个体,特别是个性因素,在这场灾难阶段复杂的社会动态中生存的参与。它们可能有助于减轻灾害风险,允许进行复杂的风险评估和社区弹性建设。