• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过数字对象标识符实现出版物的全球可见性。

Global visibility of publications through Digital Object Identifiers.

作者信息

Turki Houcemeddine, Fraumann Grischa, Hadj Taieb Mohamed Ali, Ben Aouicha Mohamed

机构信息

Data Engineering and Semantics Research Unit, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.

R&D Department, TIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Aug 17;8:1207980. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1207980. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2023.1207980
PMID:37664178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469989/
Abstract

This brief research report analyzes the availability of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) worldwide, highlighting the dominance of large publishing houses and the need for unique persistent identifiers to increase the visibility of publications from developing countries. The study reveals that a considerable amount of publications from developing countries are excluded from the global flow of scientific information due to the absence of DOIs, emphasizing the need for alternative publishing models. The authors suggest that the availability of DOIs should receive more attention in scholarly communication and scientometrics, contributing to a necessary debate on DOIs relevant for librarians, publishers, and scientometricians.

摘要

这份简短的研究报告分析了全球数字对象标识符(DOI)的可用性,强调了大型出版社的主导地位以及为提高发展中国家出版物的可见性而对唯一持久标识符的需求。该研究表明,由于缺乏DOI,大量来自发展中国家的出版物被排除在全球科学信息流动之外,这凸显了对替代出版模式的需求。作者建议,DOI的可用性在学术交流和科学计量学中应得到更多关注,这有助于引发一场与图书馆员、出版商和科学计量学家相关的关于DOI的必要辩论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be5/10469989/2622be3e9a46/frma-08-1207980-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be5/10469989/2622be3e9a46/frma-08-1207980-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be5/10469989/2622be3e9a46/frma-08-1207980-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Global visibility of publications through Digital Object Identifiers.通过数字对象标识符实现出版物的全球可见性。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Aug 17;8:1207980. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1207980. eCollection 2023.
2
Adopting ORCID as a unique identifier will benefit all involved in scholarly communication.采用ORCID作为唯一标识符将使参与学术交流的各方受益。
Natl Med J India. 2016 Jul-Aug;29(4):227-234.
3
Ten years and a million links: building a global taxonomic library connecting persistent identifiers for names, publications and people.十年与百万链接:构建一个连接名称、出版物及人员永久标识符的全球分类学库。
Biodivers Data J. 2023 Sep 14;11:e107914. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e107914. eCollection 2023.
4
Publishing scientific journals in the digital age: opportunities for small scholarly journals.数字时代的科学期刊出版:小型学术期刊的机遇
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):17-21.
5
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
6
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.出版伦理与掠夺性做法:科学传播所有利益相关者面临的困境。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(8):1010-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.黑名单和白名单应对掠夺性出版:横断面比较和主题分析。
mBio. 2019 Jun 4;10(3):e00411-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00411-19.
8
Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.开放获取:对学术出版和医学图书馆的影响
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):253-62.
9
Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?科学作者在不断变化的学术交流世界中:未来会怎样?
Am J Med. 2020 Jan;133(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
The end of print: digitization and its consequence--revolutionary changes in scholarly and social communication and in scientific research.印刷时代的终结:数字化及其影响——学术与社会交流以及科学研究领域的革命性变革。
Int J Toxicol. 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):25-34. doi: 10.1080/10915810590921351.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods to Enhance Accessibility of Japanese Medical Literature in English Journals.提高日本医学文献在英文期刊中可获取性的方法。
JMA J. 2024 Oct 15;7(4):461-470. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0140. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Conference Posters Being Cited?会议海报被引用了吗?
Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 Nov 26;6:766552. doi: 10.3389/frma.2021.766552. eCollection 2021.
2
Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics.所探究的研究数据:对引用和替代计量指标的扩展分析
Scientometrics. 2016;107:723-744. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.数字时代学术出版商的寡头垄断
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. eCollection 2015.