• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性在慢性肾病患者临床试验中的代表性。

Women's representation in clinical trials of patients with chronic kidney disease.

作者信息

Pinho-Gomes Ana-Catarina, Carcel Cheryl, Woodward Mark, Hockham Carinna

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, UK.

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2023 Feb 2;16(9):1457-1464. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad018. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfad018
PMID:37664564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex and gender differences in chronic kidney disease (CKD), including epidemiology and response to treatment, remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate how women are represented in CKD clinical trials and whether sex- and gender-disaggregated outcomes were reported.

METHODS

Clinical trials on CKD were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised, phase 3/4 trials with ≥100 participants were selected to quantify women's representation among participants by computing the participation:prevalence ratio (PPR) and investigating whether sex-disaggregated analyses had been performed.

RESULTS

In total, 192 CKD trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and published between 1995 and 2022 were included. Overall, women accounted for 66 875 (45%) of the 147 136 participants. Women's participation in clinical trials was lower than their representation in the underlying CKD population globally (55%). The PPR was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.78), with no significant variation irrespective of mean age, CKD stage, dialysis, location, type of intervention or funding agency. A total of 39 (20%) trials reported sex-disaggregated efficacy outcomes and none reported sex-disaggregated safety outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Women's participation in CKD clinical trials was lower than their representation in the underlying CKD population. Sex-disaggregated efficacy and safety outcomes were rarely reported. Improving women's enrolment into clinical trials is crucial to enable sex- and gender-disaggregated analysis and thus identify potential differences in treatment response between women and men.

摘要

背景

慢性肾脏病(CKD)中的性别差异,包括流行病学和对治疗的反应,目前仍知之甚少。本研究旨在调查CKD临床试验中女性的参与情况,以及是否报告了按性别分类的结果。

方法

从ClinicalTrials.gov上识别出CKD的临床试验。选择≥100名参与者的随机3/4期试验,通过计算参与率:患病率比(PPR)来量化女性在参与者中的占比,并调查是否进行了按性别分类的分析。

结果

总共纳入了192项于1995年至2022年间在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册并发表的CKD试验。总体而言,在147136名参与者中,女性占66875名(45%)。女性参与临床试验的比例低于她们在全球CKD基础人群中的占比(55%)。PPR为0.75(95%置信区间0.72 - 0.78),无论平均年龄、CKD分期、透析、地点、干预类型或资助机构如何,均无显著差异。共有39项(20%)试验报告了按性别分类的疗效结果,无一报告按性别分类的安全性结果。

结论

女性参与CKD临床试验的比例低于她们在CKD基础人群中的占比。按性别分类的疗效和安全性结果很少被报告。提高女性参与临床试验的比例对于进行按性别分类的分析至关重要,从而识别男女之间治疗反应的潜在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/236d71302e1d/sfad018fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/87241d7fa7ce/sfad018fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/f612e1b96c3c/sfad018fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/414213bf2165/sfad018fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/236d71302e1d/sfad018fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/87241d7fa7ce/sfad018fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/f612e1b96c3c/sfad018fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/414213bf2165/sfad018fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ba/10469102/236d71302e1d/sfad018fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's representation in clinical trials of patients with chronic kidney disease.女性在慢性肾病患者临床试验中的代表性。
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Feb 2;16(9):1457-1464. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad018. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Dementia clinical trials over the past decade: are women fairly represented?过去十年的痴呆症临床试验:女性是否得到了充分代表?
BMJ Neurol Open. 2022 Sep 5;4(2):e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000261. eCollection 2022.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Participation of Women in Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approval of Cardiovascular Drugs.女性参与支持 FDA 批准心血管药物的临床试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 8;71(18):1960-1969. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.070.
5
The participation of Arab women in randomised clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases.阿拉伯妇女参与心血管疾病随机临床试验的情况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14612. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14612. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Participation of women and sex analyses in late-phase clinical trials of new molecular entity drugs and biologics approved by the FDA in 2007-2009.2007-2009 年 FDA 批准的新分子实体药物和生物制品的后期临床试验中女性参与情况和性别分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Jul;22(7):604-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3753. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Persistent under-representation of female patients in United States trials of common vascular diseases from 2008 to 2020.2008年至2020年美国常见血管疾病试验中女性患者持续代表性不足。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.480. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Public health context of women's mental health research.女性心理健康研究的公共卫生背景。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;26(3):781-99. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00039-x.
9
Women's Participation in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials From 2010 to 2017.2010 年至 2017 年女性参与心血管临床试验情况。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):540-548. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043594. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
10
Trends in Women's Leadership of Oncology Clinical Trials.肿瘤学临床试验中女性领导力的趋势。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 8;12:885275. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.885275. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases and Vascular Function in Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病中心血管疾病与血管功能的性别差异
Cardiol Clin. 2025 Aug;43(3):371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.12.011. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Evaluating artificial intelligence bias in nephrology: the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion in AI-driven decision-making and ethical regulation.评估肾脏病学中的人工智能偏差:多样性、公平性和包容性在人工智能驱动的决策制定及伦理监管中的作用。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 May 27;8:1525937. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1525937. eCollection 2025.
3
Guidelines for sex-specific considerations to improve rigor in renal research and how we got there.

本文引用的文献

1
Underrepresentation of Women in Recent Landmark Kidney Trials: The Gender Gap Prevails.近期具有里程碑意义的肾脏试验中女性代表性不足:性别差距依然存在。
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Sep 2;7(11):2526-2529. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.08.022. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Dementia clinical trials over the past decade: are women fairly represented?过去十年的痴呆症临床试验:女性是否得到了充分代表?
BMJ Neurol Open. 2022 Sep 5;4(2):e000261. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000261. eCollection 2022.
3
Nephrologists' Perspectives on Gender Disparities in CKD and Dialysis.
提高肾脏研究严谨性的性别特异性考量指南以及我们是如何达成这些指南的。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2025 Feb 1;328(2):F204-F217. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00136.2024. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Unraveling Sex Differences in Kidney Health and CKD: A Review of the Effect of Sex Hormones.解析肾脏健康与慢性肾脏病中的性别差异:性激素作用综述
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Dec 13;20(2):301-10. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000642.
5
Advancing Healthcare Equity in Nephrology: Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Trials and Treatment Strategies.推进肾脏病学中的医疗公平:解决研究试验和治疗策略中的种族和族裔差异。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56913. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56913. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Sex disparities in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者死亡率和心血管结局的性别差异
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Feb 21;17(3):sfae044. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae044. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Novel Perspectives in Chronic Kidney Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Disease.慢性肾脏病特异性心血管疾病的新视角
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 24;25(5):2658. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052658.
8
Cardiovascular disease in older women with CKD.患有慢性肾脏病的老年女性的心血管疾病
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Oct 3;16(12):2304-2308. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad235. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Shedding a light on sex disparity in clinical trials in CKD patients.揭示慢性肾脏病患者临床试验中的性别差异。
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Jul 7;16(9):1369-1371. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad163. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Sex and gender differences in the management of chronic kidney disease and hypertension.慢性肾脏病与高血压管理中的性别差异
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Aug;37(8):649-653. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00843-9. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
肾脏病学家对慢性肾脏病和透析中性别差异的看法。
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Nov 9;7(3):424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.022. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Representation of Women in Stroke Clinical Trials: A Review of 281 Trials Involving More Than 500,000 Participants.女性在中风临床试验中的代表性:对涉及超过 50 万名参与者的 281 项试验的综述。
Neurology. 2021 Nov 2;97(18):e1768-e1774. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012767. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Sex/Gender Differences in Obesity Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Treatment.肥胖症的患病率、合并症和治疗方面的性别差异。
Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Dec;10(4):458-466. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00453-x. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Proportion of Women and Reporting of Outcomes by Sex in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中女性比例和按性别报告结局的情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124124. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24124.
7
Sex Disparities in Enrollment in Recent Randomized Clinical Trials of Acute Stroke: A Meta-analysis.性别差异在急性脑卒中近期随机临床试验中的登记:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):666-677. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0873.
8
Sex Proportionality in Pre-clinical and Clinical Trials: An Evaluation of 22 Marketing Authorization Application Dossiers Submitted to the European Medicines Agency.临床前和临床试验中的性别比例:对提交给欧洲药品管理局的22份上市许可申请档案的评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 11;8:643028. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643028. eCollection 2021.
9
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women.性别差异对药代动力学的影响可预测女性的药物不良反应。
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Jun 5;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00308-5.
10
Gender difference in cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonist in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardio-vascular outcome trials.在 2 型糖尿病中 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂对心血管结局的性别差异:心血管结局试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 May-Jun;14(3):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 26.