Li Xinqiu, Ma Tiantian, Hao Jiayu, Song Di, Wang Hongyan, Liu Tianjiao, Zhang Yaling, Abi Nanzha, Xu Xiao, Zhang Manze, Sun Weiqi, Li Xin, Dong Jie
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Feb 2;16(9):1447-1456. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad021. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Since the standard measurement of IPP is limited due to its cumbersome procedures, we aimed to develop and validate equations for estimating IPP.
We performed a cross-sectional study with a total of 200 prevalent PD patients who were divided into development and validation datasets after random sampling matched by body mass index. The IPPs were measured using the Durand method, with whole-body and abdominal anthropometry indices collected. Equations with 2.0-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were generated by stepwise linear regression modelling. The bias, accuracy and precision of the estimated IPP (eIPP) with 2-L and 1.5-L fill volumes were compared with actual IPPs by the Durand method. The eIPP for the 2-L fill volume was also compared with other existing equations.
Two new equations incorporating waist circumference and height from the decubitus plane to mid-axillary line were generated. The eIPPs exhibited small biases in relation to the Durand method , with median differences of -0.24 cmHO and -0.10 cmHO for 2 L and 1.5 L, respectively. The precisions evaluated by the standard deviation of the absolute value of the differences were 2.59 cmHO and 2.50 cmHO, respectively. The accuracies evaluated by the value of the percentage of estimates that differed by >20% for the eIPP were 26% for 2.0 L and 27% for 1.5 L. Better bias, precision and accuracy were observed for the eIPP equation compared with other existing equations for the 2.0-L fill volume.
We provided two new equations developed from abdominal anthropometry indices to accurately estimate the IPP in the PD population.
腹腔内压力(IPP)升高与腹膜透析(PD)中的腹壁并发症及技术失败相关。由于IPP的标准测量因其操作繁琐而受到限制,我们旨在开发并验证用于估算IPP的方程。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,共有200例PD患者,在按体重指数匹配随机抽样后分为开发数据集和验证数据集。使用杜兰德方法测量IPP,并收集全身和腹部人体测量指标。通过逐步线性回归建模生成2.0升和1.5升填充量的方程。将2升和1.5升填充量的估计IPP(eIPP)的偏差、准确性和精密度与杜兰德方法测量的实际IPP进行比较。还将2升填充量的eIPP与其他现有方程进行比较。
生成了两个新方程,纳入了腰围和从卧位平面到腋中线的身高。eIPP与杜兰德方法相比偏差较小,2升和1.5升时的中位数差异分别为-0.24cmH₂O和-0.10cmH₂O。通过差异绝对值的标准差评估的精密度分别为2.59cmH₂O和2.50cmH₂O。通过eIPP差异>20%的估计值百分比评估的准确性,2.0升时为26%,1.5升时为27%。与2.0升填充量的其他现有方程相比,eIPP方程的偏差、精密度和准确性更佳。
我们提供了两个基于腹部人体测量指标开发的新方程,以准确估算PD人群中的IPP。