Castellanos Loreley Betancourt, Clemente Esther Ponz, Cabañas Conchita Blasco, Parra Dolors Marquina, Contador Mabel Bolós, Morera Juan Carlos Oliva, Daly Jaume Almirall
Department of Nephrology, Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Nephrology, Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Sep-Oct;37(5):562-567. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00267. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) increases in sitting and upright positions and is related to some individual characteristics. Adverse effects can appear with IPP > 20 cm HO. Few studies about peritoneal transport or abdominal wall problems have directly measured IPP. We measured IPP in our prevalent PD patients to identify the clinical factors related to its variability and its possible association with peritoneal transport and abdominal wall complications.
We performed a retrospective, observational study of our stable PD patients. Intraperitoneal pressure was measured using the Durand's method in supine, sitting, and upright position.
Forty-nine patients were included, 70% males, mean age 61.1 ± 15 years, body mass index (BMI) 27.9 ± 5.2 kg/m. The mean of supine IPP was 18.0 ± 4.4 cm HO. Intraperitoneal pressure in sitting and upright positions were similar and higher than in supine. Supine IPP showed a positive correlation with BMI ( < 0.0005) and comorbidity ( < 0.05). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that BMI and comorbidity ( < 0.005) had a positive correlation with IPP; time on PD and daily total ultrafiltration (UF) ( < 0.005) showed a negative correlation. Patients with an IPP ≥ 20 cm HO had more hernias (35% vs 17%) and leakages (21% vs 8%) without statistical significance.
Our supine IPPs were higher than others published in adults. Intraperitoneal pressure has an individual value associated with body size. Greater IPP was correlated with lower daily total UF and more hernias and leakages. The measurement of IPP is a simple technique and can help with PD prescription, especially in obese patients.
腹膜透析(PD)患者的腹腔内压力(IPP)在坐位和直立位时会升高,且与一些个体特征有关。当IPP>20 cmH₂O时可能会出现不良反应。关于腹膜转运或腹壁问题的研究很少直接测量IPP。我们对我院接受维持性腹膜透析的患者测量了IPP,以确定与其变异性相关的临床因素及其与腹膜转运和腹壁并发症的可能关联。
我们对稳定的腹膜透析患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。采用杜兰德法测量仰卧位、坐位和直立位的腹腔内压力。
纳入49例患者,男性占70%,平均年龄61.1±15岁,体重指数(BMI)27.9±5.2kg/m²。仰卧位IPP的平均值为18.0±4.4 cmH₂O。坐位和直立位的腹腔内压力相似且高于仰卧位。仰卧位IPP与BMI呈正相关(P<0.0005),与合并症呈正相关(P<0.05)。多因素线性回归分析显示,BMI和合并症(P<0.005)与IPP呈正相关;腹膜透析时间和每日总超滤量(UF)(P<0.005)与IPP呈负相关。IPP≥20 cmH₂O的患者有更多的疝气(35%对17%)和渗漏(21%对8%),但无统计学意义。
我们研究中仰卧位IPP高于已发表的成人研究中的数值。腹腔内压力具有与体型相关的个体值。较高的IPP与较低的每日总超滤量以及更多的疝气和渗漏相关。IPP的测量是一种简单的技术,有助于腹膜透析处方的制定,尤其是在肥胖患者中。