Mak Hio Wa, Lydon-Staley David M, Lunkenheimer Erika, Lai Mark H C, Fosco Gregory M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Soc Dev. 2023 Feb;32(1):263-282. doi: 10.1111/sode.12637. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
Daily emotion dynamics provide valuable information about individuals' emotion processes as they go about their lives. Emotion dynamics such as (mean), (degree of fluctuation), and (strength of temporal connections among emotions) are associated with risks for various psychopathology in youth and adults. Prior work has shown that caregivers and friends play crucial socializing roles in adolescent emotional well-being, but less is known about their roles in daily emotion dynamics. This study examined whether caregiver emotion coaching, caregiver-adolescent closeness, and friendship quality were associated with adolescents' emotion levels, emotion variability, and emotion network density. Further, we examined whether caregiver-adolescent closeness moderated the associations between coaching and emotion dynamics. Participants were 150 adolescents (61% girls; = 14.75) and one of their caregivers (95% female; = 43.35) who completed a baseline survey and 21 daily surveys. Results showed that caregiver emotion coaching interacted with caregiver-adolescent closeness in predicting emotion levels and variability. Specifically, when closeness was higher, emotion coaching was significantly associated with lower sadness and anger levels, higher happiness levels, and lower happiness variability. Caregiver emotion coaching, independent of closeness, was also associated with lower anxiety levels, lower sadness variability, and lower emotion network density. Friendship quality was significantly associated with lower levels of sadness, anxiety, and anger, higher levels of happiness, and lower variability in anxiety and anger. These findings suggest that caregivers and friends are central to everyday emotion levels and variability and a more flexible emotion system in adolescents.
日常情绪动态为个体在生活中的情绪过程提供了有价值的信息。诸如(均值)、(波动程度)和(情绪之间的时间联系强度)等情绪动态与青少年和成年人患各种精神病理学的风险相关。先前的研究表明,照顾者和朋友在青少年的情绪健康中发挥着关键的社交作用,但对于他们在日常情绪动态中的作用了解较少。本研究考察了照顾者的情绪指导、照顾者与青少年的亲密程度以及友谊质量是否与青少年的情绪水平、情绪变异性和情绪网络密度相关。此外,我们还考察了照顾者与青少年的亲密程度是否调节了指导与情绪动态之间的关联。参与者是150名青少年(61%为女孩;平均年龄 = 14.75岁)及其一名照顾者(95%为女性;平均年龄 = 43.35岁),他们完成了一项基线调查和21项日常调查。结果表明,在预测情绪水平和变异性方面,照顾者的情绪指导与照顾者与青少年的亲密程度存在交互作用。具体而言,当亲密程度较高时,情绪指导与较低的悲伤和愤怒水平、较高的幸福水平以及较低的幸福变异性显著相关。独立于亲密程度之外,照顾者的情绪指导还与较低的焦虑水平、较低的悲伤变异性和较低的情绪网络密度相关。友谊质量与较低的悲伤、焦虑和愤怒水平、较高的幸福水平以及较低的焦虑和愤怒变异性显著相关。这些发现表明,照顾者和朋友对于青少年日常的情绪水平和变异性以及更灵活的情绪系统至关重要。