Jentoft Elian Eve
Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Front Digit Health. 2023 Aug 16;5:1168413. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1168413. eCollection 2023.
This article provides an analysis of recent loneliness policy and political discourses from the United Kingdom pertaining to older adults. Although government asserts that several groups in society are "at risk" of loneliness, older adults remain the most frequent targets of policy interventions. Technology is positioned as playing a role in the causation and alleviation of loneliness. Little research has examined loneliness in political discourses.
With a focus on how loneliness intersects with themes of technology and aging, this article presents an analysis of discourses guided by Bacchi's What is the Problem Represented to Be (WPR) framework. It endeavors to answer the following questions: What is the problem of loneliness among older adults represented to be, and what is the role of technology in this context - problem or solution?
In the discourses, assertions are made that issues of loneliness, societal change and digital exclusion are intertwined. Lonely older adults are problematized as hard to find and thus connect with interventions, warranting surveillance measures like loneliness heatmaps. Technological interventions to assist older adults in maintaining independence and connections to social networks are often proposed as solutions. The findings indicate dominant discourses position older adults primarily as subjects in need of care and as non-users of technology. Technology is positioned as a cost-effective tool to fill gaps in an overburdened and under-funded social care system that compounds issues of loneliness.
The author argues the neoliberal and stigmatizing undertones within the corpus may undermine efforts to combat loneliness. Further, austerity is silent in the dominant problematizations of loneliness, foreclosing upon alternatives that problematize loneliness as resulting from neoliberal policies that continue to dismantle public infrastructure and social care.
本文分析了英国近期有关老年人的孤独政策及政治话语。尽管政府宣称社会中的多个群体都面临孤独“风险”,但老年人仍是政策干预最常见的目标群体。技术在孤独的成因及缓解方面被认为发挥着作用。很少有研究探讨政治话语中的孤独问题。
本文聚焦于孤独如何与技术和老龄化主题相互交织,运用巴奇的“被呈现的问题是什么”(WPR)框架对相关话语进行分析。旨在回答以下问题:老年人孤独问题被呈现为什么样的问题,以及在这种背景下技术扮演着怎样的角色——是问题还是解决方案?
在这些话语中,人们断言孤独问题、社会变革和数字排斥相互交织。孤独的老年人被视为难以找到,因此难以与干预措施建立联系,这就需要像孤独热点图这样的监测措施。人们经常提出技术干预措施,以帮助老年人保持独立性并与社交网络建立联系,作为解决方案。研究结果表明,主流话语主要将老年人定位为需要照顾的对象以及技术的非使用者。技术被定位为一种经济高效的工具,以填补负担过重且资金不足的社会护理系统中的空白,但这加剧了孤独问题。
作者认为,这些语料库中存在新自由主义和污名化的潜在意味,可能会破坏抗击孤独的努力。此外,在孤独问题的主流呈现中,紧缩政策未被提及,排除了将孤独问题归因于新自由主义政策持续拆除公共基础设施和社会护理所导致的其他可能性。