Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Sustainable Health Unit, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Med Humanit. 2024 Sep 23;50(3):561-569. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-012965.
In a lot of research on loneliness and technology, there is an underlying premise that actual, physical presence is more real than 'virtual' presence. This premise is rarely explicit, yet it implies a hierarchy of reality, where the 'here and now' is always on top. In this theoretical paper, we examine this latent hierarchy and the understandings of presence and mediation it implies. We point towards potential consequences of this understanding for research on the role of technology in reducing loneliness and social isolation. To do this, we draw on the philosophical analysis made by Martin Heidegger and Jacques Derrida of what they called 'the metaphysics of presence'. This is the tendency to privilege presence as the only immediate and truthful access to reality, whereas all forms of mediations constitute mere approximations, derivations and second-rate realities with dubious truth value. First, we present their diagnosis, and then we show how it pertains to research on virtual presence and loneliness by analysing some examples from this research. Finally, we discuss some potential implications of the metaphysics of presence through a case story compiled from our empirical research. Our foundational assertion is that the question of whether anyone experiences loneliness is an empirical and not a metaphysical question. If we want to properly understand loneliness and the potential for alleviating it through the use of teletechnologies, we might get off on the wrong foot if we carry with us assumptions suggesting the existence of ascending levels of reality and presence.
在许多关于孤独和技术的研究中,存在一个隐含的前提,即实际的、身体上的存在比“虚拟”的存在更真实。这个前提很少被明确提及,但它暗示了一种现实的层次结构,其中“此时此地”总是处于首位。在这篇理论论文中,我们考察了这种潜在的层次结构以及它所暗示的存在和中介理解。我们指出了这种理解对研究技术在减少孤独和社会隔离方面的作用可能产生的潜在后果。为此,我们借鉴了马丁·海德格尔和雅克·德里达对他们所谓的“在场形而上学”的哲学分析。这种倾向是将在场作为接近现实的唯一直接和真实的方式,而所有形式的中介都只是近似、派生和二等的现实,其真实性值得怀疑。首先,我们介绍了他们的诊断,然后通过分析该研究中的一些例子,展示了它与虚拟存在和孤独研究的关系。最后,我们通过我们的实证研究中一个案例故事讨论了在场形而上学的一些潜在影响。我们的基本主张是,任何人是否感到孤独是一个经验问题,而不是形而上学问题。如果我们想通过远程技术正确理解孤独及其缓解的可能性,那么如果我们带着暗示存在着上升的现实和存在层次的假设,我们可能会走错路。