Division of Health Equity and Health Disparities Research, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, 6550 Fannin St Suite 1801, 77030, Houston, TX, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):1710. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16168-8.
Evidence for the association between social determinants of health (SDoH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is largely based on single SDoH measures, with limited evaluation of cumulative social disadvantage. We examined the association between cumulative social disadvantage and the Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex).
Using adult data from the National Health Interview Survey (2013-2017), we created a cumulative disadvantage index by aggregating 47 deprivations across 6 SDoH domains. Respondents were ranked using cumulative SDoH index quartiles (SDoH-Q1 to Q4), with higher quartile groups being more disadvantaged. We used two-part models for continuous HALex scores and logistic regression for poor HALex (< 20th percentile score) to examine HALex differences associated with cumulative disadvantage. Lower HALex scores implied poorer HRQoL performance.
The study sample included 156,182 respondents, representing 232.8 million adults in the United States (mean age 46 years; 51.7% women). The mean HALex score was 0.85 and 17.7% had poor HALex. Higher SDoH quartile groups had poorer HALex performance (lower scores and increased prevalence of poor HALex). A unit increase in SDoH index was associated with - 0.010 (95% CI [-0.011, -0.010]) difference in HALex score and 20% higher odds of poor HALex (odds ratio, OR = 1.20; 95% CI [1.19, 1.21]). Relative to SDoH-Q1, SDoH-Q4 was associated with HALex score difference of -0.086 (95% CI [-0.089, -0.083]) and OR = 5.32 (95% CI [4.97, 5.70]) for poor HALex. Despite a higher burden of cumulative social disadvantage, Hispanics had a weaker SDoH-HALex association than their non-Hispanic White counterparts.
Cumulative social disadvantage was associated with poorer HALex performance in an incremental fashion. Innovations to incorporate SDoH-screening tools into clinical decision systems must continue in order to accurately identify socially vulnerable groups in need of both clinical risk mitigation and social support. To maximize health returns, policies can be tailored through community partnerships to address systemic barriers that exist within distinct sociodemographic groups, as well as demographic differences in health perception and healthcare experience.
社会决定因素(SDoH)与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关联证据主要基于单一的 SDoH 测量,对累积社会劣势的评估有限。我们研究了累积社会劣势与健康和活动限制指数(HALex)之间的关系。
使用 2013-2017 年全国健康访谈调查的成人数据,我们通过聚合 6 个 SDoH 领域的 47 个贫困指标创建了一个累积劣势指数。通过累积 SDoH 指数四分位数(SDoH-Q1 到 Q4)对受访者进行排名,四分位数越高的群体劣势越大。我们使用两部分模型对连续的 HALex 评分和逻辑回归对 HALex 评分较差(<第 20 百分位)进行分析,以检验累积劣势与 HALex 评分的差异。HALex 评分越低意味着 HRQoL 表现越差。
研究样本包括 156182 名受访者,代表美国 2.328 亿成年人(平均年龄 46 岁;51.7%为女性)。HALex 平均评分为 0.85,17.7%的人 HALex 评分较差。较高的 SDoH 四分位数组的 HALex 评分更差(评分较低且 HALex 评分较差的比例较高)。SDoH 指数每增加一个单位,HALex 评分的差异为 -0.010(95%CI [-0.011,-0.010]),HALex 评分较差的可能性增加 20%(优势比,OR=1.20;95%CI [1.19,1.21])。与 SDoH-Q1 相比,SDoH-Q4 与 HALex 评分差异为 -0.086(95%CI [-0.089,-0.083])和 OR=5.32(95%CI [4.97,5.70]),HALex 评分较差。尽管累积社会劣势的负担较高,但与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔的 SDoH-HALex 关联较弱。
累积社会劣势与 HALex 评分呈递增关系。为了准确识别需要临床风险缓解和社会支持的弱势社会群体,必须继续将 SDoH 筛查工具纳入临床决策系统。为了最大限度地提高健康回报,可以通过社区合作伙伴关系制定政策,以解决特定社会人口群体内部以及健康感知和医疗保健经验方面的人口差异存在的系统性障碍。