Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University.
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Nov;70(6):701-710. doi: 10.1037/cou0000706. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
Previous studies show that therapist mood is associated with psychotherapy processes, but the observational nature of these studies does not allow for causal inference. It is also unclear if other therapist characteristics, such as therapist trait empathy, moderate the relation between therapist mood and process variables. Thirty-four therapists and volunteer client dyads participated in three weekly counseling sessions. Before each session, therapists were induced to experience one of three moods, elation, depression, or neutral, in a counterbalanced order, using a combination of music and the Velten method. After each session, clients rated therapist empathy and session quality, therapists rated session quality, and observers rated therapist empathy using videotapes. Electrocardiogram was collected from therapists and clients during the session to assess heart rate synchrony as an indicator of therapist empathy. Therapist trait empathy moderated the effect of mood induction on observer-rated therapist empathy, such that when induced to experience elation, therapists with high trait empathy were observed to be more empathic, whereas therapists with low trait empathy were observed to be less empathic. Therapists of different trait empathy levels did not differ on observer-rated empathy when induced to experience depression or neutral mood. No significant effect of mood induction was found for client-rated empathy, client- and therapist-rated session quality, or heart rate synchrony. The experimental design offers preliminary evidence that therapist presession mood may influence the psychotherapy process. The findings are explained in light of empathy amplification and empathy attenuation hypotheses in relation to positive emotion. Practice and research implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明治疗师的情绪与心理治疗过程有关,但这些研究的观察性质不允许进行因果推断。治疗师的其他特征(如治疗师特质共情)是否会调节治疗师情绪与过程变量之间的关系也不清楚。34 名治疗师和志愿者客户二人组参加了三次每周的咨询会议。在每次会议之前,治疗师以平衡的方式使用音乐和 Velten 方法组合来体验三种情绪之一,即兴高采烈、沮丧或中性。每次会议后,客户会对治疗师的共情和会议质量进行评分,治疗师会对会议质量进行评分,观察者会使用录像带对治疗师的共情进行评分。在会议期间,从治疗师和客户那里收集心电图,以评估心率同步作为治疗师共情的指标。治疗师特质共情调节了情绪诱导对观察者评定的治疗师共情的影响,即当诱导体验兴高采烈时,高特质共情的治疗师被观察到更具共情,而低特质共情的治疗师被观察到更缺乏共情。当诱导体验抑郁或中性情绪时,不同特质共情水平的治疗师在观察者评定的共情上没有差异。情绪诱导对客户评定的共情、客户和治疗师评定的会议质量或心率同步没有显著影响。实验设计提供了初步证据,表明治疗前的情绪可能会影响心理治疗过程。根据积极情绪与共情放大和共情衰减假说,对这些发现进行了解释。讨论了实践和研究的意义。