Suppr超能文献

吸入性过敏的多重RAST和离散RAST的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of the multiple RAST and discrete RAST for inhalant allergy.

作者信息

De Clerck L S, Verhelst J A, Bleys W, Blockx P, Stevens W J

出版信息

Allergy. 1986 Jul;41(5):327-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1986.tb00308.x.

Abstract

With the conventional, discrete RAST various tests are required to detect IgE of different specificities in the same serum. To overcome this problem and to reduce the costs, a multiple RAST with seven different mixtures was compared with the individual mixture constituents and with the 12 individual allergens currently in use in our department. One grass pollen mixture (gx3), two weed pollen mixtures (wx3, wx4), two tree pollen mixtures (tx5, tx6), one mould mixture (mx1) and one epithelial mixture (ex1) were used. A mixture of mites was not evaluated as there is only one important pathogenic organism in our regions (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or House dust mite). For grasses the gx3 mixture offered no advantage over the discrete RAST. The weed mixture wx3 was more sensitive than the most common discrete RAST's but at the cost of specificity. The wx4 mixture should not be used because the specificity is too low. The tree mixtures were not significantly more sensitive than the most common individual tree allergens, and were less specific. Mould mixtures should not be used because there is little cross-reactivity between the individual allergens, thus using a mixture would necessitate the subsequent determination of individual allergens, and the number of tests and the cost would be even higher. Neither should a mixture be used for epithelia because one wants to detect allergies to individual allergens. Moreover, the sensitivity of the epithelial mixture was too low. In general, we suggest the use of a limited panel of discrete RAST's instead of mixtures.

摘要

使用传统的离散性放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)时,需要进行各种测试来检测同一血清中不同特异性的免疫球蛋白E(IgE)。为克服这一问题并降低成本,我们将一种含有七种不同混合物的多重RAST与各个混合物成分以及我们科室目前使用的12种单一过敏原进行了比较。使用了一种草花粉混合物(gx3)、两种杂草花粉混合物(wx3、wx4)、两种树花粉混合物(tx5、tx6)、一种霉菌混合物(mx1)和一种上皮混合物(ex1)。由于我们所在地区只有一种重要的致病生物(粉尘螨),所以未对螨混合物进行评估。对于草类,gx3混合物相比离散性RAST并无优势。杂草混合物wx3比最常用的离散性RAST更敏感,但特异性有所下降。wx4混合物不应使用,因为其特异性太低。树花粉混合物并不比最常用的单一树花粉过敏原更敏感,且特异性更低。霉菌混合物不应使用,因为各个过敏原之间几乎没有交叉反应,因此使用混合物就需要随后测定单一过敏原,测试数量和成本会更高。上皮混合物也不应使用,因为人们希望检测对单一过敏原的过敏情况。此外,上皮混合物的敏感性太低。总体而言,我们建议使用一组有限的离散性RAST而非混合物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验