Suppr超能文献

2020 年修订的全面诊断标准与 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准在 IgG4 相关疾病表型中的差异敏感性:来自挪威队列的结果。

Differential sensitivity of the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic criteria and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across IgG4-related disease phenotypes: results from a Norwegian cohort.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies Veg 87, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Rheumatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Sep 5;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03155-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated sensitivity of the 2020 Revised Comprehensive Diagnostic Criteria (RCD) and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across the four identified IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) phenotypes: "Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary", "Retroperitoneum and Aorta", "Head and Neck-limited" and "Mikulicz' and Systemic" in a well-characterized patient cohort.

METHODS

We included adult patients diagnosed with IgG4-RD after comprehensive clinical assessment at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. We assigned patients to IgG4-RD phenotypes based on pattern of organ involvement and assessed fulfillment of RCD and 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Differences between phenotype groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for continuous variables, and contingency tables for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 79 IgG4-RD patients assigned to the "Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary" (22.8%), Retroperitoneum and Aorta" (22.8%) "Head and Neck-limited" (29.1%), and "Mikulicz' and Systemic" (25.3%) phenotype groups, respectively. While 72/79 (91.1%) patients in total fulfilled the RCD, proportion differed across phenotype groups and was lowest in the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" group (66.7%, p < 0.001). Among the 57 (72.2%) patients meeting the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, proportion was again lowest in the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" group (27.8%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results from this study indicate that IgG4-RD patients having the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" phenotype less often fulfill diagnostic criteria and classification criteria than patients with other IgG4-RD phenotypes. Accordingly, this phenotype is at risk of being systematically selected against in observational studies and randomized clinical trials, with potential implications for patients, caregivers and future definitions of IgG4-RD.

摘要

背景

我们研究了在四个已确定的 IgG4 相关疾病 (IgG4-RD) 表型(“胰胆管”、“腹膜后和主动脉”、“头颈部局限型”和“Mikulicz 病和系统性”)中,2020 年修订的全面诊断标准 (RCD) 和 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的敏感性。

方法

我们纳入了在挪威奥斯陆大学医院进行全面临床评估后诊断为 IgG4-RD 的成年患者。我们根据器官受累模式将患者分配到 IgG4-RD 表型,并评估了 RCD 和 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的满足情况。使用单因素方差分析比较连续变量,使用列联表比较分类变量。

结果

研究队列包括 79 名 IgG4-RD 患者,分别归入“胰胆管”(22.8%)、“腹膜后和主动脉”(22.8%)、“头颈部局限型”(29.1%)和“Mikulicz 病和系统性”(25.3%)表型组。虽然 79 名患者中有 72 名(91.1%)符合 RCD,但各表型组之间的比例不同,“腹膜后和主动脉”组的比例最低(66.7%,p<0.001)。在符合 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的 57 名患者中(72.2%),“腹膜后和主动脉”组的比例再次最低(27.8%,p<0.001)。

结论

本研究结果表明,具有“腹膜后和主动脉”表型的 IgG4-RD 患者比其他 IgG4-RD 表型的患者更不符合诊断标准和分类标准。因此,这种表型在观察性研究和随机临床试验中可能被系统性地排除在外,这可能对患者、护理人员和未来的 IgG4-RD 定义产生影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验