Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies Veg 87, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Rheumatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Sep 5;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03155-y.
We investigated sensitivity of the 2020 Revised Comprehensive Diagnostic Criteria (RCD) and the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria across the four identified IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) phenotypes: "Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary", "Retroperitoneum and Aorta", "Head and Neck-limited" and "Mikulicz' and Systemic" in a well-characterized patient cohort.
We included adult patients diagnosed with IgG4-RD after comprehensive clinical assessment at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. We assigned patients to IgG4-RD phenotypes based on pattern of organ involvement and assessed fulfillment of RCD and 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Differences between phenotype groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for continuous variables, and contingency tables for categorical variables.
The study cohort included 79 IgG4-RD patients assigned to the "Pancreato-Hepato-Biliary" (22.8%), Retroperitoneum and Aorta" (22.8%) "Head and Neck-limited" (29.1%), and "Mikulicz' and Systemic" (25.3%) phenotype groups, respectively. While 72/79 (91.1%) patients in total fulfilled the RCD, proportion differed across phenotype groups and was lowest in the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" group (66.7%, p < 0.001). Among the 57 (72.2%) patients meeting the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, proportion was again lowest in the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" group (27.8%, p < 0.001).
The results from this study indicate that IgG4-RD patients having the "Retroperitoneum and Aorta" phenotype less often fulfill diagnostic criteria and classification criteria than patients with other IgG4-RD phenotypes. Accordingly, this phenotype is at risk of being systematically selected against in observational studies and randomized clinical trials, with potential implications for patients, caregivers and future definitions of IgG4-RD.
我们研究了在四个已确定的 IgG4 相关疾病 (IgG4-RD) 表型(“胰胆管”、“腹膜后和主动脉”、“头颈部局限型”和“Mikulicz 病和系统性”)中,2020 年修订的全面诊断标准 (RCD) 和 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的敏感性。
我们纳入了在挪威奥斯陆大学医院进行全面临床评估后诊断为 IgG4-RD 的成年患者。我们根据器官受累模式将患者分配到 IgG4-RD 表型,并评估了 RCD 和 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的满足情况。使用单因素方差分析比较连续变量,使用列联表比较分类变量。
研究队列包括 79 名 IgG4-RD 患者,分别归入“胰胆管”(22.8%)、“腹膜后和主动脉”(22.8%)、“头颈部局限型”(29.1%)和“Mikulicz 病和系统性”(25.3%)表型组。虽然 79 名患者中有 72 名(91.1%)符合 RCD,但各表型组之间的比例不同,“腹膜后和主动脉”组的比例最低(66.7%,p<0.001)。在符合 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准的 57 名患者中(72.2%),“腹膜后和主动脉”组的比例再次最低(27.8%,p<0.001)。
本研究结果表明,具有“腹膜后和主动脉”表型的 IgG4-RD 患者比其他 IgG4-RD 表型的患者更不符合诊断标准和分类标准。因此,这种表型在观察性研究和随机临床试验中可能被系统性地排除在外,这可能对患者、护理人员和未来的 IgG4-RD 定义产生影响。