• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions of medical students toward assessors in interprofessional education.医学专业学生对医学生态教育评估者的看法。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Sep;35(3):297-301. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.268. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Perception of interprofessional education and educational needs of students in South Korea: A comparative study.韩国学生对跨专业教育的认知和教育需求:一项比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0243378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243378. eCollection 2020.
3
How does interprofessional education influence students' perceptions of collaboration in the clinical setting? A qualitative study.跨专业教育如何影响学生对临床环境中协作的看法?一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03372-0.
4
Comparison of learning outcomes of interprofessional education simulation with traditional single-profession education simulation: a mixed-methods study.跨专业教育模拟与传统单一专业教育模拟学习成果的比较:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03640-z.
5
How Do Classroom-Based Interprofessional Education Interactions Influence Medical Students' Clerkship Experiences?基于课堂的跨专业教育互动如何影响医学生的实习体验?
AMA J Ethics. 2023 May 1;25(5):E344-352. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.344.
6
Understanding students' readiness for interprofessional learning in an Asian context: a mixed-methods study.了解亚洲背景下学生对跨专业学习的准备情况:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 15;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0704-3.
7
Formation in Interprofessional Education in Nursing and Medical Students Globally. Scoping review.护理学专业与医学专业学生的跨专业教育中的形成。范围综述。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Jul;38(2). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v38n2e06.
8
Talking the talk in junior interprofessional education: is healthcare terminology a barrier or facilitator?在初级跨专业教育中掌握术语:医疗保健术语是障碍还是促进因素?
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02564-4.
9
What did first-year students experience during their interprofessional education? A qualitative analysis of e-portfolios.一年级学生在跨专业教育期间有哪些经历?对电子档案袋的定性分析。
J Interprof Care. 2018 May;32(3):358-366. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1427051. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
10
Dental hygiene and public health students' perception of an online interprofessional education applied learning activity.口腔卫生与公共卫生专业学生对在线跨专业教育应用学习活动的认知
J Dent Educ. 2021 Nov;85(11):1756-1764. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12729. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the application effect of inter-professional training program for newly enrolled medical staff in operating room based on digital information technology.基于数字信息技术的新入职手术室医务人员跨专业培训方案应用效果研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06256-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient safety interprofessional education program using medical error scenarios for undergraduate nursing and medical students in Korea.韩国针对本科护理专业和医学专业学生开展的、利用医疗差错案例的患者安全跨专业教育项目。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Nov 2;37(6):944-953. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2183184. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes.国际跨专业学习成果评估共识声明。
Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(4):347-359. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270441. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Use of a virtual environment to facilitate instruction of an interprofessional home assessment.使用虚拟环境促进跨专业家庭评估教学。
J Allied Health. 2011 Winter;40(4):199-205.
4
Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians.为经验丰富的医生选择绩效评估方法。
Med Educ. 2002 Oct;36(10):910-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01307.x.
5
Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability.追求客观性过程中的陷阱:有效性、效率和可接受性问题。
Med Educ. 1991 Mar;25(2):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00037.x.

医学专业学生对医学生态教育评估者的看法。

Perceptions of medical students toward assessors in interprofessional education.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Sep;35(3):297-301. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.268. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2023.268
PMID:37670526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10493405/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to establish if medical students think it is fair to be assessed by nursing professors in interprofessional education (IPE) and why.

METHODS

Eighty-seven third-year medical students who participated in the IPE in 2022 submitted self-reflection essays. They were asked how they perceived the assessors, and 86 medical students responded to content analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven students (77.9%) agreed to be assessed by nursing professors. They believed that interprofessional assessment is possible because it is an IPE. They also believed that this was an opportunity to be assessed from various perspectives. Nineteen students (22.1%) objected because the assessment criteria may be different and nursing professors would not understand the learning experiences of medical students.

CONCLUSION

Regarding the reasons medical students oppose it, IPE developers should supplement the development of assessment criteria and understand learners' experiences during planning assessment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨医学生是否认为在跨专业教育(IPE)中由护理教授进行评估是公平的,并探讨原因。

方法

2022 年,87 名三年级医学生参与了 IPE,并提交了自我反思论文。他们被问及如何看待评估者,86 名医学生对内容分析做出了回应。

结果

67 名学生(77.9%)同意由护理教授进行评估。他们认为,由于这是 IPE,因此可以进行跨专业评估。他们还认为,这是从不同角度进行评估的机会。19 名学生(22.1%)反对,因为评估标准可能不同,护理教授可能不了解医学生的学习经历。

结论

关于医学生反对的原因,IPE 开发者应在评估标准的制定中补充内容,并在规划评估时了解学习者的体验。