• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

春季温度驱动开花时间可塑性的表型选择。

Spring temperature drives phenotypic selection on plasticity of flowering time.

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 13;290(2006):20230670. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0670. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2023.0670
PMID:37670583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10510446/
Abstract

In seasonal environments, a high responsiveness of development to increasing temperatures in spring can infer benefits in terms of a longer growing season, but also costs in terms of an increased risk of facing unfavourable weather conditions. Still, we know little about how climatic conditions influence the optimal plastic response. Using 22 years of field observations for the perennial forest herb , we assessed phenotypic selection on among-individual variation in reaction norms of flowering time to spring temperature, and examined if among-year variation in selection on plasticity was associated with spring temperature conditions. We found significant among-individual variation in mean flowering time and flowering time plasticity, and that plants that flowered earlier also had a more plastic flowering time. Selection favoured individuals with an earlier mean flowering time and a lower thermal plasticity of flowering time. Less plastic individuals were more strongly favoured in colder springs, indicating that spring temperature influenced optimal flowering time plasticity. Our results show how selection on plasticity can be linked to climatic conditions, and illustrate how we can understand and predict evolutionary responses of organisms to changing environmental conditions.

摘要

在季节性环境中,春季温度升高对发育的高度响应可以带来更长的生长季节的好处,但也会增加遭遇不利天气条件的风险。尽管如此,我们对气候条件如何影响最佳可塑性反应知之甚少。本研究使用 22 年的多年生森林草本植物的野外观测数据,评估了开花时间对春季温度反应规范的个体间变异性的表型选择,并检验了可塑性选择的年际变化是否与春季温度条件有关。我们发现,开花时间的平均值和开花时间可塑性存在显著的个体间变异性,而且开花较早的植物也具有更具可塑性的开花时间。选择有利于具有较早平均开花时间和较低开花时间热可塑性的个体。在较冷的春季,可塑性较低的个体更受青睐,这表明春季温度会影响最佳开花时间的可塑性。我们的研究结果表明,可塑性选择可以与气候条件联系起来,并说明了我们如何理解和预测生物对不断变化的环境条件的进化反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/8175cda5e1c2/rspb20230670f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/245d8e66dd2c/rspb20230670f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/e5d086c05d98/rspb20230670f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/8175cda5e1c2/rspb20230670f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/245d8e66dd2c/rspb20230670f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/e5d086c05d98/rspb20230670f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae1/10510446/8175cda5e1c2/rspb20230670f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Spring temperature drives phenotypic selection on plasticity of flowering time.春季温度驱动开花时间可塑性的表型选择。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 13;290(2006):20230670. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0670. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
Climate drives among-year variation in natural selection on flowering time.气候驱动着开花时间自然选择的年内变化。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Apr;23(4):653-662. doi: 10.1111/ele.13468. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Maladaptive plastic responses of flowering time to geothermal heating.开花时间对地热加热的适应性不良的可塑性反应。
Ecology. 2023 Oct;104(10):e4121. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4121. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
A natural heating experiment: Phenotypic and genotypic responses of plant phenology to geothermal soil warming.自然加热实验:植物物候对地热土壤变暖的表型和基因型响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):954-962. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14525. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Plant-animal interactions mediate climatic effects on selection on flowering time.植物-动物相互作用调节了开花时间选择对气候的影响。
Ecology. 2021 Sep;102(9):e03466. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3466. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Selection against early flowering in geothermally heated soils is associated with pollen but not prey availability in a carnivorous plant.在受热土壤中,对早期开花的选择与花粉有关,而与肉食植物的猎物供应无关。
Am J Bot. 2022 Nov;109(11):1693-1701. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16047. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
7
Testing the evolutionary potential of an alpine plant: phenotypic plasticity in response to growth temperature outweighs parental environmental effects and other genetic causes of variation.测试高山植物的进化潜力:生长温度对表型可塑性的影响大于亲本环境效应和其他遗传变异因素。
J Exp Bot. 2024 Sep 27;75(18):5971-5988. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae290.
8
Spring and autumn phenology in an understory herb are uncorrelated and driven by different factors.林下草本植物的春-秋物候与不同的因素有关,二者之间没有相关性。
Am J Bot. 2022 Feb;109(2):226-236. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1789. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
9
Effects of plant size and weather on the flowering phenology of the organ pipe cactus (Stenocereus thurberi).植株大小和天气对管风琴仙人掌(Stenocereus thurberi)开花物候的影响。
Ann Bot. 2008 Dec;102(6):1019-30. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn194. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
Will phenotypic plasticity affecting flowering phenology keep pace with climate change?表型可塑性对开花物候的影响能否跟上气候变化的步伐?
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2499-2508. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13532. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual variation in reaction norms but no directional selection in reproductive plasticity of a wild passerine population.野生雀形目鸟类种群反应规范中的个体差异,但繁殖可塑性无定向选择。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e8582. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8582. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Selection on adaptive and maladaptive gene expression plasticity during thermal adaptation to urban heat islands.在城市热岛对热的适应过程中,对适应和不适应的基因表达可塑性的选择。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 26;12(1):6195. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26334-4.
3
Plant-animal interactions mediate climatic effects on selection on flowering time.
植物-动物相互作用调节了开花时间选择对气候的影响。
Ecology. 2021 Sep;102(9):e03466. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3466. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
4
Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals.鸟类和哺乳动物繁殖期的波动最优选择和时间变化选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31969-31978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009003117. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.表型可塑性的选择有利于热驯化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29767-29774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012454117. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
Plasticity leaves a phenotypic signature during local adaptation.可塑性在局部适应过程中留下了表型印记。
Evol Lett. 2020 Jun 9;4(4):360-370. doi: 10.1002/evl3.185. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
The relative importance of plasticity versus genetic differentiation in explaining between population differences; a meta-analysis.探讨在解释种群间差异时,可塑性与遗传分化的相对重要性:一项荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Oct;23(10):1432-1441. doi: 10.1111/ele.13565. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
Temperature has a causal and plastic effect on timing of breeding in a small songbird.温度对一种小型鸣禽的繁殖时间具有因果和塑性效应。
J Exp Biol. 2020 Apr 23;223(Pt 8):jeb218784. doi: 10.1242/jeb.218784.
9
Climate drives among-year variation in natural selection on flowering time.气候驱动着开花时间自然选择的年内变化。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Apr;23(4):653-662. doi: 10.1111/ele.13468. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Shifting perspectives on the impacts of phenotypic plasticity.对表型可塑性影响的观点转变。
New Phytol. 2019 Nov;224(3):1009-1011. doi: 10.1111/nph.16210.