School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):3128-3138. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01769-1. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
To identify how studies measure racism-related variables at the interpersonal level and identify associated breast and gynecological cancer disparities among Black women.
A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus using terms centered on racism and cancer. Inclusion criteria consisted of the study being conducted in the USA with Black or African American women and the study stating an outcome or focus identified as a breast or gynecological cancer health disparity. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts and full texts articles and completed quality assessments of included studies. Data were extracted into a matrix table, and common concepts were identified and synthesized using the matrix method. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools.
Thirteen studies that examined the effect of racism-related variables operating at the interpersonal level on breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer outcomes in Black women were identified for inclusion. Across studies, racism-related variables were measured as discrimination, trust, racism, and clinician-patient interactions. Additionally, across studies, disparities were identified in cancer screening, treatment received, survivorship quality of life, and incidence.
This review highlights the need for valid, reliable, and consistent measurement of racism operating at the interpersonal level to first understand its impact on cancer health disparities and to also facilitate the development and evaluation of interventions aimed at mitigating interpersonal-level racism.
确定研究如何在人际层面测量与种族主义相关的变量,并确定这些变量与黑人女性乳腺癌和妇科癌症差异之间的关联。
本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行了系统文献回顾。在 PubMed、CINAHL Plus 和 Scopus 中使用以种族主义和癌症为中心的术语进行了搜索。纳入标准包括在美国进行的、以黑人和非裔美国女性为研究对象的研究,以及报告了乳腺癌或妇科癌症健康差异相关结果或重点的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选标题和摘要以及全文文章,并对纳入研究进行质量评估。数据被提取到矩阵表中,使用矩阵方法识别和综合共同概念。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。
确定了 13 项研究,这些研究检查了人际层面种族主义相关变量对黑人女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌和卵巢癌结果的影响。在研究中,种族主义相关变量被测量为歧视、信任、种族主义和医患互动。此外,在研究中还发现了癌症筛查、接受的治疗、生存质量和发病率方面的差异。
本综述强调需要对人际层面的种族主义进行有效、可靠和一致的测量,以首先了解其对癌症健康差异的影响,并促进旨在减轻人际层面种族主义的干预措施的制定和评估。