Suppr超能文献

CPPS 和 AVQI 的声学测量,治疗前后的言语治疗。

Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy.

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste - UNICENTRO - Irati (PR), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2023 Sep 1;35(6):e20220136. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022136pt. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) at pre- and post-voice therapy times.

METHODS

This is a before and after intervention study, with retrospective data collection. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 49.9 years participated in the study. The vocal therapy occurred between the years 2016 to 2019 in a teaching clinic, and the subjects had vocal samples collected before and after the therapeutic processes. CPPS and AVQI data extractions were performed during pre- and post-therapy. In order to characterize the sample, auditory-perceptual evaluation (APE) regarding the overall degree of vocal deviation at pre- and post-therapy moments was performed. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The APE data indicated a decrease in the median values of overall vocal deviation degree at the post-therapy stage for both the vowel (p=0.00) and number (p=0.00) samples. The average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pre-therapy and 16.37 post-therapy (p=0.01); for the number emission, it was 8.22 pre-therapy and 9.06 post-therapy (p=0.02), there was a difference in the CPPS of the vowel and numbers indicating vocal improvement at post-therapy. The average AVQI was 2.27 pre-therapy and 1.54 post-therapy (p=0.05). There was an improvement in the AVQI results, with borderline p-value.

CONCLUSION

Vocal therapy produced changes in the general degree of vocal deviation, as well as in CPPS and AVQI measurements, and the results at the post-therapy moment are similar to those of vocally healthy individuals.

摘要

目的

比较 Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed(CPPS)和 Acoustic Voice Quality Index(AVQI)在语音治疗前后的声学测量值。

方法

这是一项干预前后的研究,采用回顾性数据收集。22 名受试者的平均年龄为 49.9 岁。语音治疗于 2016 年至 2019 年在一所教学诊所进行,受试者在治疗前后采集了嗓音样本。在治疗前后分别进行 CPPS 和 AVQI 数据提取。为了对样本进行特征描述,在治疗前后的时刻对整体嗓音偏离程度进行了听觉感知评估(APE)。对数据进行了统计学分析。

结果

APE 数据表明,在治疗后阶段,元音(p=0.00)和数字(p=0.00)样本的整体嗓音偏离程度中位数均下降。元音的平均 CPPS 治疗前为 14.53,治疗后为 16.37(p=0.01);对于数字发音,治疗前为 8.22,治疗后为 9.06(p=0.02),元音和数字的 CPPS 存在差异,表明治疗后嗓音有所改善。平均 AVQI 治疗前为 2.27,治疗后为 1.54(p=0.05)。AVQI 结果有所改善,具有边缘显著的 p 值。

结论

语音治疗改变了整体嗓音偏离程度,以及 CPPS 和 AVQI 的测量值,治疗后的结果与嗓音健康个体相似。

相似文献

1
Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy.
Codas. 2023 Sep 1;35(6):e20220136. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022136pt. eCollection 2023.
3
Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Its Isolated Acoustic Measures to Discriminate the Severity of Voice Disorders.
J Voice. 2022 Jul;36(4):582.e1-582.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
J Voice. 2015 Jan;29(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
7
Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints.
Codas. 2024 May 20;36(4):e20230148. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023148pt. eCollection 2024.
10
Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
J Voice. 2020 May;34(3):485.e33-485.e43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in voice quality after a Pure Tone Stimulation (PTS) Program.
Rev Investig Innov Cienc Salud. 2025;7(1). doi: 10.46634/riics.325. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The Validity of Cepstral Analysis to Distinguish Between Different Levels of Perceptual Dysphonia in the Persian Vocal Tasks.
J Voice. 2024 Nov;38(6):1523.e9-1523.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in the Measurement of Voice Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1055-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(2):141-152. doi: 10.1159/000518206. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Correlation Between Subjective and Objective Parameters of Voice in Elderly Male Speakers.
J Voice. 2022 Nov;36(6):823-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Its Isolated Acoustic Measures to Discriminate the Severity of Voice Disorders.
J Voice. 2022 Jul;36(4):582.e1-582.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
Epidemiological Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in a Private Practice Community Voice Clinic.
J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):437.e11-437.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
8
Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1596-1607. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00001. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Multiparameter Voice Assessment in Dysphonics: Correlation Between Objective and Perceptual Parameters.
J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验