Moore J C, Bown E, Outlaw M C, Jelfs R, Holman R R, Turner R C
Ann Clin Biochem. 1986 Jan;23 ( Pt 1):85-91. doi: 10.1177/000456328602300110.
Glycosylated haemoglobin was measured in venous blood samples and in blood collected in 'Unistep' bottles by isoelectric focusing (IEF), as the reference method, and by electroendosmosis (EEO), the thiobarbituric acid method (TBA), ion-exchange chromatography (IEC) and affinity chromatography (AC). Isoelectric focusing, electroendosmosis and thiobarbituric acid gave similar results. Affinity chromatography gave lower results than isoelectric focusing for normal values but similar results for diabetics. Ion-exchange chromatography gave 24% lower results than isoelectric focusing across the range. Using Unistep collected blood samples and comparing multiple samples from the same patient, electroendosmosis gave the best results (coefficient of variation 4%) and thiobarbituric acid gave slightly less good precision that other methods. Re-use of affinity chromatography columns gave less good precision. Collection of blood samples into a Unistep bottle gave similar results to venous sample results. Storage of venous capillary blood samples in Unistep bottles over 1 week at 21 degrees C gave similar results to immediate assay. Electroendosmosis of blood samples in Unistep bottles gave stable results over 2 weeks. Home collection by a patient of a capillary blood sample into a Unistep bottle allows glycosylated haemoglobin results to be available when seen in the clinic.
采用等电聚焦(IEF)作为参考方法,以及电渗(EEO)、硫代巴比妥酸法(TBA)、离子交换色谱法(IEC)和亲和色谱法(AC),对静脉血样本和收集于“Unistep”瓶中的血液样本进行糖化血红蛋白检测。等电聚焦、电渗和硫代巴比妥酸法得出的结果相似。亲和色谱法得出的正常数值低于等电聚焦法,但糖尿病患者的结果与之相似。在整个范围内,离子交换色谱法得出的结果比等电聚焦法低24%。使用收集于Unistep瓶中的血液样本并比较同一患者的多个样本,电渗法得出的结果最佳(变异系数为4%),硫代巴比妥酸法的精密度略逊于其他方法。重复使用亲和色谱柱得到的精密度较差。将血液样本收集到Unistep瓶中得出的结果与静脉样本结果相似。将静脉毛细血管血样本储存在Unistep瓶中于21摄氏度下保存1周以上,得出的结果与立即检测相似。对Unistep瓶中的血液样本进行电渗,在2周内结果稳定。患者在家中将毛细血管血样本收集到Unistep瓶中,使得在诊所就诊时就能获得糖化血红蛋白检测结果。