Jeenah Natasha Rooksana, Damodaran Prabha Ramesh, Puhalla Harald
Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD, Australia, 4215.
Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD, Australia, 4215.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Sep;110:108718. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108718. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
Splenic cysts are classified as true cysts, or pseudocysts, and larger cysts tend to be symptomatic, requiring management which has evolved to include spleen-sparing procedures to minimize the risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis (OPSS) Pitiakoudis et al. (2011), Hansen and Moller (2004), Knook et al. (2019) [1-3]. Total splenectomy remains the gold standard management, and the importance of this case is the uncommon spontaneous occurrence of a pseudocyst, and the importance to pre-operatively consent and prepare the patient for total splenectomy would intra-operative conditions not allow for spleen-preserving techniques.
CS, a 21-year-old lady, had two presentations to the emergency department with left upper quadrant abdominal pain. The only abnormality on assessment was a large splenic cyst on CT scan, which increased in size on re-presentation. She was consented for a splenic cyst fenestration, and for total splenectomy and optimized with vaccines would intra-operative conditions not allow for spleen-sparing. During the operation, the planes between the cyst and spleen parenchyma were ill-defined, and decision was made to proceed with total splenectomy to avoid bleeding complications. She recovered well, and was discharged 5 days post-operatively, and histology confirmed a pseudocyst (Figs. 1 and 2).
The management of splenic cysts remains difficult and with no clear guidelines to uniform treatment. There are multiple spleen-preserving techniques developed to avoid OPSS (Agha RA, Franchi T, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, for the SCARE Group, 2020 [4]), however management remains individualized and case-specific.
Pseudocysts can occur without splenic trauma or infarct. Management is case-based, and patients with large symptomatic cysts should be consented and prepared for total splenectomy would conditions not be safe for spleen-preserving interventions.
脾囊肿分为真性囊肿或假性囊肿,较大的囊肿往往有症状,需要进行处理,目前已发展到采用保留脾脏的手术,以尽量降低脾切除术后暴发性感染(OPSS)的风险(皮蒂亚库迪斯等人,2011年;汉森和莫勒,2004年;克努克等人,2019年)[1 - 3]。全脾切除术仍然是标准的治疗方法,该病例的重要性在于假性囊肿罕见的自发发生情况,以及如果术中情况不允许采用保留脾脏的技术,术前需取得患者同意并为全脾切除术做好准备的重要性。
CS,一名21岁女性,因左上腹疼痛两次到急诊科就诊。评估时唯一的异常是CT扫描发现一个大的脾囊肿,再次就诊时囊肿增大。她同意进行脾囊肿开窗引流术,若术中情况不允许保留脾脏,则同意进行全脾切除术,并接受疫苗优化。手术过程中,囊肿与脾实质之间的界限不清,决定进行全脾切除术以避免出血并发症。她恢复良好,术后5天出院,组织学检查证实为假性囊肿(图1和图2)。
脾囊肿的处理仍然困难,且没有统一治疗的明确指南。为避免OPSS已开发出多种保留脾脏的技术(阿加·拉伊、弗兰奇、索拉比、马修,代表SCARE小组,2020年[4]),然而治疗仍然是个体化且因病例而异的。
假性囊肿可在无脾外伤或梗死的情况下发生。治疗以病例为基础,对于有症状的大囊肿患者,如果保留脾脏的干预措施不安全,应取得患者同意并为全脾切除术做好准备。