• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对自我管理教育项目的满意度及看法:一项定性研究

Patient Satisfaction and Perspectives on Self-Management Education Programs: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Ricci Laetitia, Buzzi Marie, Kivits Joelle, Rat Anne-Christine

机构信息

CIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, F-54000, France.

APEMAC, équipe MICS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, F-54000, France.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 1;17:2175-2186. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S414126. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S414126
PMID:37675388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10478927/
Abstract

PURPOSE

According to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, "Self-management education (SME) refers to programs that help people who have ongoing health conditions learn how to live life to the fullest". Most studies to date have focused on SME outcomes, such as the acquisition of predefined knowledge or skills or quality of life. However, no study has yet investigated patients' satisfaction with SMEs. The aim of the present study was therefore to explore participants' subjective appreciation of SME programs using qualitative methods and formulate propositions based on patients' preferences to improve ultimately clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five participants from five French SME programs to conduct focus groups were recruited. An inductive approach using grounded theory as an overall methodology orientation for the thematic analysis process has been followed. The study was reported in compliance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research criteria (COREQ).

RESULTS

Patients expressed great satisfaction concerning the effective delivery of SME sessions. They appreciated the considerations for their concerns and needs, the adaptation of sessions' content to their interests and questions, and learning to take care of themselves. Moreover, patients had a positive opinion on the quality of their relationship with health care providers. However, the major point of improvement of SMEs was the opportunity to repeat the program if needed, as this opportunity was not offered. This consideration was particularly salient when patients did not consider themselves autonomous for disease management at the end of the program, ie, when they had low levels of perceived self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

While patients expressed great satisfaction regarding SME programs, our results suggest that some changes might be needed to make the endpoint of SME interventions coincide with the patient's perception of self-efficacy in disease self-management and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

根据疾病控制与预防中心的定义,“自我管理教育(SME)是指帮助患有持续性健康问题的人们学习如何充分生活的项目”。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在自我管理教育的结果上,比如获取预先定义的知识或技能,或者生活质量。然而,尚无研究调查患者对自我管理教育项目的满意度。因此,本研究的目的是采用定性方法探索参与者对自我管理教育项目的主观评价,并根据患者的偏好提出建议,以最终改善临床结果。

患者与方法

招募了来自五个法国自我管理教育项目的25名参与者进行焦点小组访谈。采用归纳法,将扎根理论作为主题分析过程的总体方法论导向。本研究按照定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)进行报告。

结果

患者对自我管理教育课程的有效开展表示非常满意。他们赞赏对其关切和需求的关注、课程内容根据其兴趣和问题进行的调整,以及学会照顾自己。此外,患者对与医护人员关系的质量持积极看法。然而,自我管理教育项目的主要改进点是在需要时重复该项目的机会,因为目前并未提供这一机会。当患者在项目结束时认为自己在疾病管理方面缺乏自主性,即自我效能感较低时,这一考量尤为突出。

结论

虽然患者对自我管理教育项目表示非常满意,但我们的结果表明,可能需要做出一些改变,以使自我管理教育干预的终点与患者在疾病自我管理中的自我效能感认知相契合,并最终改善临床结果。

相似文献

1
Patient Satisfaction and Perspectives on Self-Management Education Programs: A Qualitative Study.患者对自我管理教育项目的满意度及看法:一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 1;17:2175-2186. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S414126. eCollection 2023.
2
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Community-Based Medical Education on Health Literacy and Patient Empowerment in Underserved Populations: A Pilot Cohort Study.评估社区医学教育对服务不足人群健康素养和患者赋权的影响:一项试点队列研究。
Clin Pract. 2025 May 22;15(6):97. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15060097.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Management About Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.乳腺癌幸存者辅助治疗的自我管理:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 23;16:2663-2681. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S379435. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors Affecting the Reception of Self-Management Health Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Perspectives of Lower-Income Seniors with Cardiovascular Conditions.影响自我管理健康教育接受度的因素:一项评估低收入心血管疾病老年人观点的横断面调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Apr 8;16:971-981. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S351459. eCollection 2022.
3
A focus group study to inform design of a symptom management intervention for adults with atrial fibrillation.一项焦点小组研究,旨在为成人房颤症状管理干预措施的设计提供信息。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2021 Sep 16;2(5):246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.09.001. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Tailored patient therapeutic educational interventions: A patient-centred communication model.定制化患者治疗教育干预:以患者为中心的沟通模式。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):276-289. doi: 10.1111/hex.13377. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Chronic Disease Management, Self-Efficacy and Quality of Life.慢性病管理、自我效能感与生活质量。
J Nurs Res. 2021 Feb 1;29(1):e129. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000422.
7
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.如何使用和评估定性研究方法。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z. eCollection 2020.
8
Qualitative Sampling Methods.定性抽样方法。
J Hum Lact. 2020 Nov;36(4):579-581. doi: 10.1177/0890334420949218. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Dimensions, application, and outcomes of person-centered self-management interventions for those living with type 2 diabetes: A scoping review.以患者为中心的 2 型糖尿病自我管理干预的维度、应用和结果:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1961-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.