Endress Christoph, Schwenk Michael, Werner Christian, Becker Clemens, Jansen Carl-Philipp
Klinik für Geriatrische Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Geriatrisches Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Oct;56(6):464-469. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02230-y. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
The lifestyle-integrated functional exercise (LiFE) program has been shown to increase physical activity. It remains unclear, however, how these changes translate into long vs. short walking episodes.
The aim of this work was to investigate changes in short vs. long walking episodes between baseline and 6‑month follow-up and to determine which factors are associated with these changes.
This was a two-arm randomized noninferiority study with 309 older adults (mean age 78.7 ± 0.3 years; 73.5% female) at risk of falling who exercised either in a group (gLiFE; n = 153) or individually (LiFE; n = 156). Walking episodes were measured using activPAL 4micro sensors: a distinction was made between walking episodes < 10s, < 20s, and > 60 s. Changes in walking episodes between baseline and 6‑month follow-up were analyzed, including calculation of effect sizes (Cohen's d). Determinants of changes in the walking episodes were analyzed using multiple regression.
The walking episodes < 10s and < 20 s showed a significant increase in both intervention groups but not for > 60 s. The overall daily walking duration and average steps per day had an influence on changes in the walking episodes between baseline and 6 months. Parameters of objective and subjective function explained a very small but significant amount of the variance.
The LiFE program seems to work on a behavioral rather than on a functional level. By accumulating short walking episodes, large gains in physical activity can potentially be achieved. This can be of health-promoting benefit especially for persons living in institutional settings or for those who are cautious or even anxious to undertake longer walking episodes (e.g., outdoors).
生活方式整合功能锻炼(LiFE)计划已被证明可增加身体活动。然而,尚不清楚这些变化如何转化为长时与短时步行时段。
本研究旨在调查基线至6个月随访期间短时与长时步行时段的变化,并确定与这些变化相关的因素。
这是一项双臂随机非劣效性研究,纳入309名有跌倒风险的老年人(平均年龄78.7±0.3岁;73.5%为女性),他们分别参加了团体锻炼(gLiFE;n = 153)或个体锻炼(LiFE;n = 156)。使用activPAL 4微型传感器测量步行时段:区分<10秒、<20秒和>60秒的步行时段。分析基线至6个月随访期间步行时段的变化,包括效应量(Cohen's d)的计算。使用多元回归分析步行时段变化的决定因素。
两个干预组中<10秒和<20秒的步行时段均显著增加,但>60秒的步行时段未增加。总体每日步行时长和每日平均步数对基线至6个月期间步行时段的变化有影响。客观和主观功能参数解释了非常小但显著的方差量。
LiFE计划似乎在行为层面而非功能层面起作用。通过积累短时步行时段,有可能在身体活动方面取得显著收益。这对健康有益,尤其对于居住在机构环境中的人或那些谨慎甚至焦虑于进行较长步行时段(如户外)的人。