Suppr超能文献

运动干预预防颈部疼痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions for Preventing Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Bochum, Germany.

Physio Meets Science, Leimen, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct;53(10):594–609. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12063.

Abstract

To update the evidence on the effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent episodes of neck pain. Systematic review with meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and trial registries from inception to December 2, 2022. Forward and backward citation searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults without neck pain at baseline and compared exercise interventions to no intervention, placebo/sham, attention control, or minimal intervention. Military populations and astronauts were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE approach. Of 4703 records screened, 5 trials (1722 participants at baseline) were included and eligible for meta-analysis. Most (80%) participants were office workers. Risk of bias was rated as some concerns for 2 trials and high for 3 trials. There was moderate-certainty evidence that exercise interventions probably reduce the risk of a new episode of neck pain (OR, 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.31, 0.76) compared to no or minimal intervention in the short-term (≤12 months). The results were not robust to sensitivity analyses for missing outcome data. There was moderate-certainty evidence supporting exercise interventions for reducing the risk for an episode of neck pain in the next 12 months. The clinical significance of the effect is unclear. .

摘要

更新关于预防颈部疼痛发作的运动干预措施的有效性的证据。系统评价与荟萃分析。检索 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、PEDro 和试验注册处,检索时间为从建库到 2022 年 12 月 2 日。同时进行了向前和向后的引文搜索。纳入了基线时无颈部疼痛的成年人的随机对照试验(RCT),并比较了运动干预与无干预、安慰剂/假干预、注意对照或最小干预。排除了军事人群和宇航员。使用随机效应荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane RoB 2 工具评估偏倚风险。根据 GRADE 方法判断证据的确定性。在筛选的 4703 条记录中,有 5 项试验(基线时有 1722 名参与者)被纳入并符合荟萃分析的条件。大多数(80%)参与者为办公室工作人员。有 2 项试验的偏倚风险被评为存在一些关注,3 项试验的偏倚风险被评为高。有中等确定性证据表明,与无干预或最小干预相比,运动干预在短期内(≤12 个月)可能降低新发颈部疼痛的风险(OR,0.49;95%置信区间:0.31,0.76)。对于缺失结局数据的敏感性分析,结果并不稳健。有中等确定性证据支持运动干预可降低未来 12 个月颈部疼痛发作的风险。该效应的临床意义尚不清楚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验