Sletten Tracey L, Weaver Matthew D, Foster Russell G, Gozal David, Klerman Elizabeth B, Rajaratnam Shantha M W, Roenneberg Till, Takahashi Joseph S, Turek Fred W, Vitiello Michael V, Young Michael W, Czeisler Charles A
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sleep Health. 2023 Dec;9(6):801-820. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.07.016. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
To develop and present consensus findings of the National Sleep Foundation sleep timing and variability panel regarding the impact of sleep timing variability on health and performance.
The National Sleep Foundation assembled a panel of sleep and circadian experts to evaluate the scientific evidence and conduct a formal consensus and voting procedure. A systematic literature review was conducted using the NIH National Library of Medicine PubMed database, and panelists voted on the appropriateness of 3 questions using a modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 2 rounds of voting.
The literature search and panel review identified 63 full text publications to inform consensus voting. Panelists achieved consensus on each question: (1) is daily regularity in sleep timing important for (a) health or (b) performance? and (2) when sleep is of insufficient duration during the week (or work days), is catch-up sleep on weekends (or non-work days) important for health? Based on the evidence currently available, panelists agreed to an affirmative response to all 3 questions.
Consistency of sleep onset and offset timing is important for health, safety, and performance. Nonetheless, when insufficient sleep is obtained during the week/work days, weekend/non-work day catch-up sleep may be beneficial.
阐述美国国家睡眠基金会睡眠时间与变异性小组关于睡眠时间变异性对健康和表现影响的共识性研究结果。
美国国家睡眠基金会召集了一个由睡眠和昼夜节律专家组成的小组,以评估科学证据并进行正式的共识和投票程序。使用美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed数据库进行了系统的文献综述,小组成员采用改进的德尔菲兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法,就3个问题的适宜性进行两轮投票。
文献检索和小组评审确定了63篇全文出版物,为共识投票提供参考。小组成员就每个问题达成了共识:(1)睡眠时间的每日规律性对(a)健康或(b)表现是否重要?以及(2)当一周(或工作日)睡眠时长不足时,周末(或非工作日)补觉对健康是否重要?基于目前可得的证据,小组成员对所有3个问题都给出了肯定回答。
入睡和起床时间的一致性对健康、安全和表现很重要。尽管如此,如果一周/工作日睡眠不足,周末/非工作日补觉可能有益。