Stanford Sleep Epidemiology Research Center, Division of Public Mental Health and Population Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sleep Health. 2017 Feb;3(1):6-19. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
To provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance to the public regarding indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span.
The National Sleep Foundation assembled a panel of experts from the sleep community and representatives appointed by stakeholder organizations (Sleep Quality Consensus Panel). A systematic literature review identified 277 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Abstracts and full-text articles were provided to the panelists for review and discussion. A modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 3 rounds of voting was used to determine agreement.
For most of the sleep continuity variables (sleep latency, number of awakenings >5minutes, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency), the panel members agreed that these measures were appropriate indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span. However, overall, there was less or no consensus regarding sleep architecture or nap-related variables as elements of good sleep quality.
There is consensus among experts regarding some indicators of sleep quality among otherwise healthy individuals. Education and public health initiatives regarding good sleep quality will require sustained and collaborative efforts from multiple stakeholders. Future research should explore how sleep architecture and naps relate to sleep quality. Implications and limitations of the consensus recommendations are discussed.
为公众提供有关整个生命周期良好睡眠质量指标的循证建议和指导。
国家睡眠基金会召集了来自睡眠领域的专家和利益相关组织任命的代表组成一个小组(睡眠质量共识小组)。系统文献回顾确定了符合纳入标准的 277 项研究。向小组成员提供摘要和全文文章进行审查和讨论。采用改良德尔菲 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法进行了 3 轮投票,以确定共识。
对于大多数睡眠连续性变量(睡眠潜伏期、>5 分钟的觉醒次数、睡眠起始后的觉醒和睡眠效率),小组成员一致认为这些措施是整个生命周期良好睡眠质量的适当指标。然而,总体而言,对于睡眠结构或与午睡相关的变量作为良好睡眠质量的要素,意见分歧较小或没有共识。
专家们对健康个体的一些睡眠质量指标达成了共识。关于良好睡眠质量的教育和公共卫生举措将需要来自多个利益相关者的持续和协作努力。未来的研究应探讨睡眠结构和午睡与睡眠质量的关系。讨论了共识建议的意义和局限性。