• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者与食品可持续标签的互动:叙事文献综述。

Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling on Food Products: A Narrative Literature Review.

机构信息

Independent Researcher, Oxford OX4 3UD, UK.

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2023 Sep 2;15(17):3837. doi: 10.3390/nu15173837.

DOI:10.3390/nu15173837
PMID:37686869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10489983/
Abstract

Sustainability labelling on food products can help consumers make informed purchasing decisions and support the urgent transition to sustainable food systems. While there is a relatively robust body of evidence on health and nutrition labelling, less is known about the effectiveness of sustainability labelling in facilitating sustainable food choices. This paper investigates the impact of sustainability labelling on consumer understanding, attitudes, and behaviour to support a more nuanced, detailed, and holistic understanding of the evidence. Using a narrative literature review methodology, the paper assesses studies covering environmental, social, and/or animal welfare aspects of sustainability labelling on food products. We found that consumer understanding of sustainability information is often limited, which could hinder behaviour change. While sustainability labelling can influence consumer attitudes and purchasing behaviours, evidence from real consumer settings tends to show small effect sizes. Consumers are generally willing to pay more for sustainability-labelled products, and organic labelling often leads to the highest reported willingness to pay. The review emphasises the importance of trust, suggesting a preference for labelling backed by governments or public authorities. Sustainability labelling that uses intuitively understandable cues has an increased impact, with visual aids such as traffic light colours showing promise. We conclude that further research is needed in real-world settings, using representative populations and exploring the influence of demographic factors, values, and attitudes.

摘要

食品产品的可持续性标签可以帮助消费者做出明智的购买决策,并支持向可持续食品系统的紧急转型。虽然关于健康和营养标签已经有了相对丰富的证据,但对于可持续性标签在促进可持续食品选择方面的有效性知之甚少。本文研究了可持续性标签对消费者理解、态度和行为的影响,以支持对证据进行更细致、更详细和更全面的理解。本文使用叙述性文献综述方法,评估了涵盖食品产品可持续性标签的环境、社会和/或动物福利方面的研究。我们发现,消费者对可持续性信息的理解往往有限,这可能会阻碍行为的改变。虽然可持续性标签可以影响消费者的态度和购买行为,但来自真实消费者环境的证据往往显示出较小的效应大小。消费者通常愿意为可持续性标签产品支付更高的价格,而有机标签通常会导致报告的最高支付意愿。该综述强调了信任的重要性,表明消费者更倾向于选择有政府或公共机构支持的标签。使用直观易懂的提示的可持续性标签具有更大的影响力,例如使用红绿灯颜色等视觉辅助工具显示出了前景。我们的结论是,需要在现实环境中进行进一步的研究,使用代表性人群,并探索人口统计因素、价值观和态度的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/967ee1956f86/nutrients-15-03837-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/e963da548c87/nutrients-15-03837-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/952add7fca0c/nutrients-15-03837-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/3e9395e39df8/nutrients-15-03837-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/0e55102a0ced/nutrients-15-03837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/967ee1956f86/nutrients-15-03837-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/e963da548c87/nutrients-15-03837-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/952add7fca0c/nutrients-15-03837-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/3e9395e39df8/nutrients-15-03837-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/0e55102a0ced/nutrients-15-03837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d8/10489983/967ee1956f86/nutrients-15-03837-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling on Food Products: A Narrative Literature Review.消费者与食品可持续标签的互动:叙事文献综述。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 2;15(17):3837. doi: 10.3390/nu15173837.
2
Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.消费者对有机食品和本地食品可持续性属性的认知
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2018;9(2):87-96. doi: 10.2174/2212798410666171215112058.
3
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
4
Using the water footprint concept for water use efficiency labelling of consumer products: the Greek experience.利用水足迹概念对消费产品的用水效率进行标签标注:希腊的经验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):19918-19930. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23573-w. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
5
Exploring Consumers' Understanding and Perception of Sustainable Food Packaging in the UK.探索英国消费者对可持续食品包装的理解与认知。
Foods. 2022 Oct 28;11(21):3424. doi: 10.3390/foods11213424.
6
Impact of color-coded and warning nutrition labelling schemes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.彩色编码和警示性营养标签方案的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 5;18(10):e1003765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003765. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
8
Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Relation to Animal Welfare-Friendly Products: Evidence from Taiwan.消费者对动物福利友好型产品的态度和购买意向:来自台湾的证据。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 31;14(21):4571. doi: 10.3390/nu14214571.
9
Consumer Trust in Food and the Food System: A Critical Review.消费者对食品及食品体系的信任:一项批判性综述。
Foods. 2021 Oct 18;10(10):2490. doi: 10.3390/foods10102490.
10
Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review.可持续饮食维度。比较消费者对营养、环境和社会责任食品标签的偏好:一项系统综述。
Sustainability. 2019 Nov 21;11(23):6575. doi: 10.3390/su11236575.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Industry and individuals: branding, labelling, and marketing of food products.社论:企业与个人:食品产品的品牌塑造、标签标注及营销
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 28;12:1555875. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1555875. eCollection 2025.
2
Examining the moderation of the relationship between socio-economic status and consumption intentions by food information labels.考察食品信息标签对社会经济地位与消费意愿之间关系的调节作用。
Appetite. 2025 Mar 1;207:107869. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107869. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review.可持续饮食维度。比较消费者对营养、环境和社会责任食品标签的偏好:一项系统综述。
Sustainability. 2019 Nov 21;11(23):6575. doi: 10.3390/su11236575.
2
Effects of environmental impact and nutrition labelling on food purchasing: An experimental online supermarket study.环境影响和营养标签对食品购买的影响:一项在线超市实验研究
Appetite. 2023 Jan 1;180:106312. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106312. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
Developing health and environmental warning messages about red meat: An online experiment.
生态评分标签对美国消费者对环境可持续性的认知和购买食品意愿的影响:一项随机实验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306123. eCollection 2024.
开发关于红肉类食品的健康和环境警示信息:一项在线实验。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0268121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268121. eCollection 2022.
4
Is it really organic? Credibility factors of organic food-A systematic review and bibliometric analysis.它真的是有机的吗?有机食品的可信度因素——一项系统综述与文献计量分析
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266855. eCollection 2022.
5
Digital nudges to stimulate healthy and pro-environmental food choices in E-groceries.数字助推以刺激电子杂货中健康和环保食品的选择。
Appetite. 2022 May 1;172:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105971. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers.测试食品标签警语以劝阻消费者食用红色肉类:一项针对美国肉食消费者的随机对照试验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Sep 8;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01178-9.
7
The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review.环境可持续性标签对食品和饮料产品的选择、购买及消费的影响:一项系统综述
Environ Behav. 2021 Oct;53(8):891-925. doi: 10.1177/0013916521995473. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Willingness-to-Pay for Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.环境可持续性标签对食品支付意愿的影响:离散选择实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 31;13(8):2677. doi: 10.3390/nu13082677.
9
Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: A meta-analysis of coffee ecolabelling.为具有社会责任感的产品支付意愿:咖啡生态标签的荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2021 Jun 23;7(6):e07043. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07043. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews.气候变化对健康的影响:系统综述概述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 9;11(6):e046333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333.