Potter Christina, Bastounis Anastasios, Hartmann-Boyce Jamie, Stewart Cristina, Frie Kerstin, Tudor Kate, Bianchi Filippo, Cartwright Emma, Cook Brian, Rayner Mike, Jebb Susan A
University of Oxford, UK.
University of Nottingham, UK.
Environ Behav. 2021 Oct;53(8):891-925. doi: 10.1177/0013916521995473. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
This review assessed the effects of environmental labels on consumers' demand for more sustainable food products. Six electronic databases were searched for experimental studies of ecolabels and food choices. We followed standard Cochrane methods and results were synthesized using vote counting. Fifty-six studies ( = 42,768 participants, 76 interventions) were included. Outcomes comprised selection ( = 14), purchase ( = 40) and consumption ( = 2). The ecolabel was presented as text ( = 36), logo ( = 13) or combination ( = 27). Message types included: organic ( = 25), environmentally sustainable ( = 27), greenhouse gas emissions ( = 17), and assorted "other" message types ( = 7). Ecolabels were tested in actual ( = 15) and hypothetical ( = 41) environments. Thirty-nine studies received an unclear or high RoB rating. Sixty comparisons favored the intervention and 16 favored control. Ecolabeling with a variety of messages and formats was associated with the selection and purchase of more sustainable food products.
本综述评估了环境标签对消费者对更可持续食品产品需求的影响。检索了六个电子数据库,以查找有关生态标签与食品选择的实验研究。我们遵循Cochrane标准方法,并使用投票计数法综合结果。纳入了56项研究(n = 42768名参与者,76项干预措施)。结果包括选择(n = 14)、购买(n = 40)和消费(n = 2)。生态标签以文本形式呈现(n = 36)、标志形式呈现(n = 13)或两者结合形式呈现(n = 27)。信息类型包括:有机(n = 25)、环境可持续(n = 27)、温室气体排放(n = 17)以及各种“其他”信息类型(n = 7)。生态标签在实际环境(n = 15)和假设环境(n = 41)中进行了测试。39项研究的风险偏倚评级不明确或较高。60项比较结果支持干预措施,16项支持对照措施。带有各种信息和格式的生态标签与选择和购买更可持续的食品产品相关。