• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住老年人的身体活动:哪些现实世界的加速度计测量是可靠的?系统综述。

Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Which Real-World Accelerometry Measures Are Robust? A Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;23(17):7615. doi: 10.3390/s23177615.

DOI:10.3390/s23177615
PMID:37688071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10490754/
Abstract

Measurement of real-world physical activity (PA) data using accelerometry in older adults is informative and clinically relevant, but not without challenges. This review appraises the reliability and validity of accelerometry-based PA measures of older adults collected in real-world conditions. Eight electronic databases were systematically searched, with 13 manuscripts included. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for were: walking duration (0.94 to 0.95), lying duration (0.98 to 0.99), sitting duration (0.78 to 0.99) and standing duration (0.98 to 0.99). ICCs for ranged from 0.24 to 0.82 for step counts and 0.48 to 0.86 for active calories. ranged from 5864 to 10,832 steps and for active calories from 289 to 597 kcal. ICCs for for step count were 0.02 to 0.41, and for active calories 0.07 to 0.93. for step count ranged from 0.83 to 0.98. Percentage of agreement for walking ranged from 63.6% to 94.5%; for lying 35.6% to 100%, sitting 79.2% to 100%, and standing 38.6% to 96.1%. between step count and criteria for moderate-to-vigorous PA was = 0.68 and 0.72. Inter-rater reliability and criterion validity for walking, lying, sitting and standing duration are established. Criterion validity of step count is also established. Clinicians and researchers may use these measures with a limited degree of confidence. Further work is required to establish these properties and to extend the repertoire of PA measures beyond "volume" counts to include more nuanced outcomes such as intensity of movement and duration of postural transitions.

摘要

使用加速度计测量老年人的真实世界体力活动 (PA) 数据具有信息性和临床相关性,但并非没有挑战。本综述评估了在真实环境中收集的老年人基于加速度计的 PA 测量的可靠性和有效性。系统地检索了 8 个电子数据库,共纳入 13 篇文献。 的组内相关系数 (ICC) 为:行走时长 (0.94 至 0.95)、卧床时长 (0.98 至 0.99)、坐姿时长 (0.78 至 0.99) 和站立时长 (0.98 至 0.99)。步数的 ICC 范围为 0.24 至 0.82,活跃卡路里的 ICC 范围为 0.48 至 0.86。步数范围为 5864 至 10832 步,活跃卡路里范围为 289 至 597 千卡。对于步数,ICC 为 0.02 至 0.41,对于活跃卡路里,ICC 为 0.07 至 0.93。对于活跃卡路里,ICC 为 0.83 至 0.98。对于步数,百分比一致性为 63.6%至 94.5%;对于卧床,百分比一致性为 35.6%至 100%;对于坐姿,百分比一致性为 79.2%至 100%;对于站立,百分比一致性为 38.6%至 96.1%。对于中高强度体力活动,步数与标准之间的相关系数 = 0.68 和 0.72。行走、卧床、坐姿和站立时长的组内一致性和标准效度已经确立。步数的标准效度也已经确立。临床医生和研究人员可以在一定程度上有信心地使用这些指标。还需要进一步的工作来确立这些特性,并将 PA 测量的范围从“量”的计数扩展到包括运动强度和姿势转换持续时间等更细致的结果。

相似文献

1
Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Which Real-World Accelerometry Measures Are Robust? A Systematic Review.社区居住老年人的身体活动:哪些现实世界的加速度计测量是可靠的?系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;23(17):7615. doi: 10.3390/s23177615.
2
Validity and reliability of accelerometry in identification of lying, sitting, standing or purposeful activity in adult hospital inpatients recovering from acute or critical illness: a systematic review.加速度计在识别急性或危重病住院成人康复期的躺卧、坐立、站立或有目的活动中的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Feb;32(2):233-242. doi: 10.1177/0269215517724850. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
Psychometric viability of measures of functional performance commonly used for people with dementia: a systematic review of measurement properties.常用于痴呆症患者的功能表现测量方法的心理测量可行性:测量属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):115-71. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003064.
4
Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.用于评估溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动度的内镜评分指数。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):CD011450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011450.pub2.
5
Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors.用于增加成年中风幸存者身体活动量的活动监测器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 27;7(7):CD012543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012543.pub2.
6
The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review.消费级活动追踪器在老年、社区居住成年人中的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Maturitas. 2018 Jun;112:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Exercise for intermittent claudication.间歇性跛行的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 26;12(12):CD000990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000990.pub4.
9
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Gait Detection from a Wrist-Worn Sensor Using Machine Learning Methods: A Daily Living Study in Older Adults and People with Parkinson's Disease.基于机器学习的腕部传感器步态检测:老年人和帕金森病患者日常生活研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;22(18):7094. doi: 10.3390/s22187094.
2
A Smartwatch Step-Counting App for Older Adults: Development and Evaluation Study.一款针对老年人的智能手表步数计数应用程序:开发与评估研究。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Aug 10;5(3):e33845. doi: 10.2196/33845.
3
Distributed Full Synchronized System for Global Health Monitoring Based on FLSA.
基于 FLSA 的全球健康监测分布式全同步系统。
IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2022 Aug;16(4):600-608. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2022.3173586. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Assessing Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity in Older Adults: Validity of a Commercial Activity Tracker.评估老年人的中度至剧烈身体活动:一种商业活动追踪器的效度
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jan 3;3:766317. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.766317. eCollection 2021.
5
Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of Three Consumer-Grade Activity Trackers in Controlled and Free-Living Conditions among Older Adults.三种消费级活动追踪器在老年人受控和自由生活条件下的有效性、可靠性和变化敏感性。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;21(18):6245. doi: 10.3390/s21186245.
6
Classical Machine Learning Versus Deep Learning for the Older Adults Free-Living Activity Classification.经典机器学习与深度学习在老年人自由活动分类中的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 7;21(14):4669. doi: 10.3390/s21144669.
7
The association of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with skeletal muscle strength and muscle power in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.客观测量的身体活动和久坐行为与老年人骨骼肌力量和肌肉力量的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 May;67:101266. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101266. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity duration is more important than timing for physical function in older adults.对于老年人的身体功能而言,中等至剧烈体力活动的持续时间比时间安排更为重要。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 7;10(1):21344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78072-0.
9
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.世界卫生组织 2020 年关于身体活动和 sedentary behaviour 的指南。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
10
The Use of Inertial Measurement Units for the Study of Free Living Environment Activity Assessment: A Literature Review.惯性测量单元在自由生活环境活动评估研究中的应用:文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 1;20(19):5625. doi: 10.3390/s20195625.