Department of Political Science and the Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination CEPDISC, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 7, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2023 Dec;41(Suppl 1):66-81. doi: 10.1007/s40592-023-00180-0. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
There has been considerable debate over regulated organ markets. Especially current markets, where people sell one of their kidneys while still alive, have received increased attention. Futures markets remain an interesting and under-discussed alternative specification of a market-based solution to the organ shortage. Futures markets pertain to the sale of the right to procure people's organs after they die. There is a wide range of possible specifications of the futures market. There are, however, some major unaddressed efficiency concerns. This article presents this class of concerns and discusses the implication for organ futures markets. It identifies a number of inefficiency sources pertaining to crowding out, bad organs, costs and missed opportunities, family refusals, moral hazard and strength of the provided incentive. However, a complete assessment of futures market requires better knowledge regarding the potential reaction from donors, families and health professionals.
器官交易一直是颇具争议的话题。尤其是当前的市场,人们在活着的时候出售自己的一个肾脏,这引起了更多的关注。期货市场仍然是一种有趣且讨论较少的替代方案,可以解决器官短缺问题。期货市场是指在人们死后出售获取其器官的权利。期货市场有广泛的可能规范。然而,存在一些未解决的主要效率问题。本文提出了这类问题,并讨论了其对器官期货市场的影响。它确定了与排挤、劣质器官、成本和错失的机会、家庭拒绝、道德风险和提供的激励力度相关的一些效率来源。然而,对期货市场的全面评估需要更好地了解捐赠者、家庭和卫生专业人员的潜在反应。