Suppr超能文献

静脉性下肢溃疡患者临床结局的预后模型:系统评价。

Prognostic models for clinical outcomes in patients with venous leg ulcers: A systematic review.

机构信息

Health Economics and Outcome Research (HEOR) Department, Hartmann Group, Heidenheim, Germany; Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, Hall, Tirol, Austria.

Source Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101673. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to identify prognostic models for clinical application in patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases from inception to December 22, 2021. Eligible studies reported prognostic models aimed at developing, validating, and adjusting multivariable prognostic models that include multiple prognostic factors combined, and that predicted clinical outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using the CHARMS checklist and PROBAST short form questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were identified, of which three were validation studies of previously published models, four reported derivation and validation of models, and the remainder reported derivation models only. There was substantial heterogeneity in the model characteristics, including 11 studies focused on wound healing outcomes reporting 91 different predictors. Three studies shared similar predicted outcomes, follow-up timepoint and used a Cox proportional hazards model. However, these models reported different predictor selection methods and different predictors and it was therefore not feasible to summarize performance, such as discriminative ability.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no standout risk prediction models in the literature with promising clinical application for patients with VLUs. Future research should focus on developing and validating high-performing models in wider VLU populations.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在确定静脉溃疡(VLUs)患者临床应用的预后模型。

方法

从建库至 2021 年 12 月 22 日,对 Embase、Medline、Cochrane 和 CINAHL 数据库进行文献检索。合格的研究报告了旨在开发、验证和调整多变量预后模型的预后模型,这些模型包括多个联合预后因素,并预测临床结局。使用 CHARMS 清单和 PROBAST 简短问卷评估方法学质量。

结果

确定了 13 项研究,其中 3 项是先前发表模型的验证研究,4 项报告了模型的推导和验证,其余报告了仅推导模型。模型特征存在很大异质性,包括 11 项侧重于伤口愈合结局的研究,报告了 91 个不同的预测因子。有 3 项研究具有相似的预测结局、随访时间点,并使用 Cox 比例风险模型。然而,这些模型报告了不同的预测因子选择方法和不同的预测因子,因此无法总结性能,如判别能力。

结论

文献中没有具有良好临床应用前景的静脉溃疡预后模型。未来的研究应集中于在更广泛的静脉溃疡人群中开发和验证性能较高的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3794/11523447/1ccb25ce4ede/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验