• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗急性心肌梗死合并癌症患者的比较。

Comparisons of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for the treatment of cancer patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, Gongti South Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.

Department of Cardiology, Heze Municipal Hospital, No. 2888, Caozhou Road, Mudan District, Heze, 274000, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 9;28(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01316-y.

DOI:10.1186/s40001-023-01316-y
PMID:37689799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492280/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment for cancer patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging. The objective of the study was to investigate the safety and efficiency of drug eluting balloon (DEB) versus drug eluting stent (DES) in this high-risk group.

METHODS

Between 1st January 2017 and 1st January 2022, cancer patients admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital with AMI were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). The secondary endpoints included major bleeding events, heart failure and cardiac complications.

RESULTS

A total of 164 cancer patients presenting with AMI were included in the final analysis. Patients treated with DEB had a numerically lower rate of MACE than those treated with DES during a median follow-up of 21.8 months (22.9% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.23). Patients treated with DEB had a trend towards lower rate of major bleeding events than patients treated with DES (6.3% vs. 18.1%, HR 2.96, 95% CI [0.88, 9.92], p = 0.08). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to the rate of heart failure (4.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.32) and cardiac complications (0.0% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that in cancer patients with AMI, DEB had a trend towards lower rate of major bleeding events and a numerically lower rate of MACE compared with DES.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并癌症患者的治疗仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨药物洗脱球囊(DEB)与药物洗脱支架(DES)在这一高危人群中的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性纳入 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 1 日期间因 AMI 入住北京朝阳医院的癌症患者。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。次要终点包括主要出血事件、心力衰竭和心脏并发症。

结果

共纳入 164 例 AMI 合并癌症的患者进行最终分析。在中位随访 21.8 个月时,与 DES 相比,DEB 治疗患者的 MACE 发生率较低(22.9%比 37.1%,p=0.23)。与 DES 相比,DEB 治疗患者的主要出血事件发生率呈下降趋势(6.3%比 18.1%,HR 2.96,95%CI [0.88, 9.92],p=0.08)。两组心力衰竭(4.2%比 9.5%,p=0.32)和心脏并发症(0.0%比 2.6%,p=0.56)发生率无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在 AMI 合并癌症的患者中,与 DES 相比,DEB 治疗有较低的主要出血事件发生率和较低的 MACE 发生率趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ab/10492280/60fce5ae2831/40001_2023_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ab/10492280/6a9c6751332d/40001_2023_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ab/10492280/60fce5ae2831/40001_2023_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ab/10492280/6a9c6751332d/40001_2023_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ab/10492280/60fce5ae2831/40001_2023_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for the treatment of cancer patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.药物洗脱球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗急性心肌梗死合并癌症患者的比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 9;28(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01316-y.
2
[Efficacy comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-coated balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients with de novo coronary lesions].药物涂层球囊血管成形术或药物洗脱支架置入术对急性心肌梗死合并初发冠状动脉病变患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 24;48(7):600-607. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200327-00254.
3
First results of the DEB-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 6-month angiographic, intravascular, functional, and clinical outcomes.DEB-AMI(药物洗脱球囊用于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死)试验的初步结果:药物洗脱球囊联合金属裸支架与金属裸支架和药物洗脱支架在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的多中心随机比较:6 个月的血管造影、血管内、功能和临床结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2327-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.027. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting balloon for treatment of small coronary artery in patients with acute myocardial infarction.药物洗脱球囊治疗急性心肌梗死患者小冠状动脉的临床疗效。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;16(4):913-918. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02530-w. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-eluting balloon angioplasty: the nonrandomized fourth arm of the DEB-AMI (drug-eluting balloon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial.药物洗脱球囊血管成形术进行的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:DEB-AMI(ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的药物洗脱球囊)试验的非随机第四组。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86 Suppl 1:S34-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26060. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架再狭窄的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):881-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25072. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. 1-year results of the randomized XAMI (XienceV Stent vs. Cypher Stent in Primary PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.急性心肌梗死中第二代依维莫司洗脱支架与第一代西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较。随机 XAMI(XienceV 支架与 Cypher 支架在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较)试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 31;60(5):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.073.
8
The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease.单纯药物球囊或与药物洗脱支架联合治疗初发型弥漫性冠状动脉疾病的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.005.
9
Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis of available evidence.药物洗脱球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的比较:现有证据的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.040. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of in-stent restenosis as compared with drug-eluting stents and with conventional balloon angioplasty.与药物洗脱支架及传统球囊血管成形术相比,药物洗脱球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的疗效和安全性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):501-6. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.189. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Coated Balloons in All-Comer Population-Are We There Yet?面向所有人群的药物涂层球囊——我们做到了吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3608. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103608.
2
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of preoperative drug elution balloon therapy in patients with elective tumor surgery and coronary heart disease: a retrospective clinical study : The best choice of PCI for patients with elective tumor surgery and CHD.择期肿瘤手术合并冠心病患者术前药物洗脱球囊治疗的有效性和安全性评估:一项回顾性临床研究:择期肿瘤手术合并冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最佳选择
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04623-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-Coated Balloon for Small Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With and Without High-Bleeding Risk in the BASKET-SMALL 2 Trial.BASKET-SMALL 2 试验中高出血风险患者与无高出血风险患者的小血管病变的药物涂层球囊治疗。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr;15(4):e011569. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011569. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
2
Impact of Active and Historical Cancer on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者的活动性和既往癌症对短期和长期结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 15;159:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and impact of active cancer in patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from an all-comer registry.
急性心肌梗死患者中活动性癌症的患病率、临床特征和影响:来自一个所有患者登记处的数据。
J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(3):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Cancer Patients Have a Higher Risk of Thrombotic and Ischemic Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.癌症患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后发生血栓栓塞和缺血事件的风险更高。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1094-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.049.
5
Effect of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on in-hospital outcomes among active cancer patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a propensity score matching analysis.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对伴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的活动期癌症患者住院结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 27;10(8):829-839. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa032.
6
Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: current and future perspectives.药物洗脱支架血栓形成:当前和未来的观点。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Apr;36(2):158-168. doi: 10.1007/s12928-021-00754-x. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Cancer.合并癌症的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特征、管理及结局
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 12;9(11):3642. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113642.
8
Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cancer.急性冠状动脉综合征合并癌症患者的管理。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Oct 10;22(12):159. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01409-8.
9
Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group.药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉疾病:国际 DCB 共识专家组第三次报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1391-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 May 27.
10
Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: current concepts and controversies.用于冠状动脉疾病的药物涂层球囊:当前概念与争议
Future Cardiol. 2019 Nov;15(6):437-454. doi: 10.2217/fca-2019-0009. Epub 2019 Nov 5.