Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.024. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
To assess effects of the CARE4Carer blended care intervention on caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning compared with usual care in partners of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI).
Multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Nine sites for rehabilitation medicine.
120 partners of outpatients with ABI were randomly allocated to blended care (N=59) or usual care (N=61).
The blended care intervention (20 weeks) was aimed at improving caregiving skills and consisted of 9 online sessions, combined with 2 face-to-face consultations with a social worker.
Mastery was assessed with the Caregiver Mastery Scale, secondary outcome measures were caregiver strain (Caregiver Strain Index), family functioning (Family Assessment Device), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), burden (self-rated), and quality of life (CarerQol). Assessments were performed at baseline, 24, and 40 weeks.
The adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery between intervention and control group at week 24 was 1.31 (SD3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12 to 2.74, P=.072) and at week 40 was 1.31 (SD3.69, 95% CI -0.26 to 2.88, P=.100). In the per protocol analysis, the adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery at week 24 was 1.53 (SD3.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.96, P=.036) and at week 40 was 1.57 (SD3.63, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.14, P=.049). Regarding secondary outcomes, caregiver strain was lower in the intervention group in the per protocol analysis at week 40. Family functioning was higher in the intervention group in week 24, whereas anxiety was lower at both timepoints.
In the subset of participants who were able to complete the intervention, caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning improved. Future work should focus on improving adherence as this will optimize beneficial effects of blended care.
评估 CARE4Carer 混合护理干预对照顾者掌握程度和心理社会功能的影响,与接受脑损伤(ABI)患者的配偶的常规护理相比。
多中心随机对照试验。
康复医学 9 个地点。
120 名接受 ABI 门诊治疗的配偶被随机分配到混合护理组(n=59)或常规护理组(n=61)。
混合护理干预(20 周)旨在提高护理技能,包括 9 节在线课程,以及与社会工作者进行 2 次面对面咨询。
掌握程度用照顾者掌握量表评估,次要观察指标为照顾者压力(照顾者压力指数)、家庭功能(家庭评估工具)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、负担(自评)和生活质量(照顾者质量)。评估在基线、24 周和 40 周进行。
在 24 周时,干预组和对照组的照顾者掌握程度的调整平均差异为 1.31(SD3.48,95%置信区间(CI)-0.12 至 2.74,P=.072),在 40 周时为 1.31(SD3.69,95%CI-0.26 至 2.88,P=.100)。在按方案分析中,在 24 周时,照顾者掌握程度的调整平均差异为 1.53(SD3.38,95%CI0.10 至 2.96,P=.036),在 40 周时为 1.57(SD3.63,95%CI0.01 至 3.14,P=.049)。关于次要结果,在按方案分析中,干预组在 40 周时的照顾者压力较低。在 24 周时,家庭功能在干预组中较高,而焦虑在两个时间点都较低。
在能够完成干预的参与者亚组中,照顾者掌握程度和心理社会功能得到了改善。未来的工作应重点提高依从性,这将优化混合护理的有益效果。