Suppr超能文献

脑损伤患者的伴侣接受混合护理干预的效果 - CARE4Carer 随机对照试验结果。

The Effects of a Blended Care Intervention in Partners of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury - Results of the CARE4Carer Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.024. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess effects of the CARE4Carer blended care intervention on caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning compared with usual care in partners of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI).

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Nine sites for rehabilitation medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

120 partners of outpatients with ABI were randomly allocated to blended care (N=59) or usual care (N=61).

INTERVENTION

The blended care intervention (20 weeks) was aimed at improving caregiving skills and consisted of 9 online sessions, combined with 2 face-to-face consultations with a social worker.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mastery was assessed with the Caregiver Mastery Scale, secondary outcome measures were caregiver strain (Caregiver Strain Index), family functioning (Family Assessment Device), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), burden (self-rated), and quality of life (CarerQol). Assessments were performed at baseline, 24, and 40 weeks.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery between intervention and control group at week 24 was 1.31 (SD3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12 to 2.74, P=.072) and at week 40 was 1.31 (SD3.69, 95% CI -0.26 to 2.88, P=.100). In the per protocol analysis, the adjusted mean difference in caregiver mastery at week 24 was 1.53 (SD3.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.96, P=.036) and at week 40 was 1.57 (SD3.63, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.14, P=.049). Regarding secondary outcomes, caregiver strain was lower in the intervention group in the per protocol analysis at week 40. Family functioning was higher in the intervention group in week 24, whereas anxiety was lower at both timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

In the subset of participants who were able to complete the intervention, caregiver mastery and psychosocial functioning improved. Future work should focus on improving adherence as this will optimize beneficial effects of blended care.

摘要

目的

评估 CARE4Carer 混合护理干预对照顾者掌握程度和心理社会功能的影响,与接受脑损伤(ABI)患者的配偶的常规护理相比。

设计

多中心随机对照试验。

地点

康复医学 9 个地点。

参与者

120 名接受 ABI 门诊治疗的配偶被随机分配到混合护理组(n=59)或常规护理组(n=61)。

干预

混合护理干预(20 周)旨在提高护理技能,包括 9 节在线课程,以及与社会工作者进行 2 次面对面咨询。

主要观察指标

掌握程度用照顾者掌握量表评估,次要观察指标为照顾者压力(照顾者压力指数)、家庭功能(家庭评估工具)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、负担(自评)和生活质量(照顾者质量)。评估在基线、24 周和 40 周进行。

结果

在 24 周时,干预组和对照组的照顾者掌握程度的调整平均差异为 1.31(SD3.48,95%置信区间(CI)-0.12 至 2.74,P=.072),在 40 周时为 1.31(SD3.69,95%CI-0.26 至 2.88,P=.100)。在按方案分析中,在 24 周时,照顾者掌握程度的调整平均差异为 1.53(SD3.38,95%CI0.10 至 2.96,P=.036),在 40 周时为 1.57(SD3.63,95%CI0.01 至 3.14,P=.049)。关于次要结果,在按方案分析中,干预组在 40 周时的照顾者压力较低。在 24 周时,家庭功能在干预组中较高,而焦虑在两个时间点都较低。

结论

在能够完成干预的参与者亚组中,照顾者掌握程度和心理社会功能得到了改善。未来的工作应重点提高依从性,这将优化混合护理的有益效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验