• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估转移性结直肠癌住院患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险:现有风险评分的验证和新风险评分的开发。

Estimating Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Inpatients: Validation of Existing Risk Scores and Development of New Risk Scores.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231196859. doi: 10.1177/10760296231196859.

DOI:10.1177/10760296231196859
PMID:37691565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10498692/
Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to (1) evaluate the efficacy of 4 existing cancer-specific VTE models in predicting VTE incidence among hospitalized mCRC patients, and (2) examine the influence of incorporating mCRC molecular subtypes into these models. We conducted an evaluation of 4 cancer-specific VTE models, including Khorana, Vienna CATS, Protecht, and CONKO in a dataset involving 1392 mCRC patients. To evaluate the predictive performance, we utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both the original models and the modified models that incorporated microsatellite instability status or // mutations. Moreover, we computed the net reclassification improvement (NRI) to quantify the enhancements made to the modified VTE risk models. All models demonstrated a moderate area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) when predicting the occurrence of VTE: Khorana (0.550), Vienna CATS (0.671), Protecht (0.652), and CONKO (0.578). The incorporation of and mutations significantly improved the ROC-AUC of all 4 existing models (modified Khorana: 0.796, modified Vienna CATS: 0.832, modified Protecht: 0.834, and modified CONKO: 0.809). After dichotomizing the risk using a threshold of 3 points and comparing them with the original models, NRI values for the 4 modified models were 0.97, 0.95, 1.11, and 0.98, respectively. All 4 cancer-specific VTE models exhibit moderate performance when identifying mCRC patients at high risk of VTE. Incorporating and mutations may enhance the prediction of VTE in hospitalized mCRC patients.

摘要

转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者易发生静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)。本研究旨在:(1)评估 4 种现有的癌症特异性 VTE 模型在预测住院 mCRC 患者 VTE 发生率方面的有效性;(2)探讨将 mCRC 分子亚型纳入这些模型的影响。我们在一个包含 1392 例 mCRC 患者的数据集里评估了 4 种癌症特异性 VTE 模型,包括 Khorana、Vienna CATS、Protecht 和 CONKO。为了评估预测性能,我们分别使用原始模型和纳入微卫星不稳定性状态或 // 突变的改良模型的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。此外,我们计算了净重新分类改善(NRI),以量化改良 VTE 风险模型的改进程度。所有模型在预测 VTE 发生方面的 ROC 曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)均为中度:Khorana(0.550)、Vienna CATS(0.671)、Protecht(0.652)和 CONKO(0.578)。纳入 // 突变可显著提高所有 4 个现有模型的 ROC-AUC(改良 Khorana:0.796,改良 Vienna CATS:0.832,改良 Protecht:0.834,改良 CONKO:0.809)。使用 3 分作为风险截断值将风险分为两类,并与原始模型进行比较,4 个改良模型的 NRI 值分别为 0.97、0.95、1.11 和 0.98。这 4 种癌症特异性 VTE 模型在识别有发生 VTE 高风险的 mCRC 患者方面表现出中等效能。纳入 // 突变可能会提高对住院 mCRC 患者 VTE 的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8987/10498692/88fa56f9656f/10.1177_10760296231196859-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8987/10498692/88fa56f9656f/10.1177_10760296231196859-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8987/10498692/88fa56f9656f/10.1177_10760296231196859-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Inpatients: Validation of Existing Risk Scores and Development of New Risk Scores.评估转移性结直肠癌住院患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险:现有风险评分的验证和新风险评分的开发。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231196859. doi: 10.1177/10760296231196859.
2
Comparison among three predictive models for cancer-associated thromboembolism in a hispanic population.三种预测模型在西班牙裔人群中癌症相关血栓栓塞的比较。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Oct;56(3):433-438. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02861-3. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Tumor oncogene (KRAS) status and risk of venous thrombosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.肿瘤癌基因(KRAS)状态与转移性结直肠癌患者静脉血栓形成风险。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):998-1003. doi: 10.1111/jth.12910. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
4
Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer according to oncogenic status.结直肠癌患者根据致癌状态的静脉血栓栓塞发生率。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Nov;22(11):2026-2031. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02339-1. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Comparison between the Khorana prediction score and Caprini risk assessment models for assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer: a retrospective case control study.比较 Khorana 预测评分和 Caprini 风险评估模型在评估住院癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞风险中的应用:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):454-460. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa137.
6
Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with haematological cancers using three prediction models.运用三种预测模型评估血液系统恶性肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞风险。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):17771-17780. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05475-7. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Optimal authoritative risk assessment score of Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism for hospitalized medical patients with lung Cancer.住院肺癌内科患者癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的最佳权威风险评估评分
Thromb J. 2021 Dec 4;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12959-021-00339-x.
8
Evaluation of the Khorana, PROTECHT, and 5-SNP scores for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.评估 Khorana、PROTECHT 和 5-SNP 评分预测癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症的价值。
J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Dec;19(12):2974-2983. doi: 10.1111/jth.15503. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Utility of the Khorana and the new-Vienna CATS prediction scores in cancer patients of the HYPERCAN cohort.癌症患者 HYPERCAN 队列中 Khorana 评分和新维也纳 CATS 评分的效用。
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jul;21(7):1869-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.03.037. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
10
A Clinical-Genetic Risk Score for Predicting Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Development and Validation Study Involving Two Independent Prospective Cohorts.一种用于预测癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的临床-遗传风险评分:涉及两个独立前瞻性队列的开发和验证研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;41(16):2911-2925. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00255. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of KRAS mutations on risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.KRAS突变对转移性结直肠癌患者静脉血栓栓塞复发风险的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03843-w.
2
Novel Insights in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Methods in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: From the Guidelines to Clinical Practice.门诊癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估方法的新见解:从指南到临床实践
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 21;16(2):458. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020458.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of the Khorana and the new-Vienna CATS prediction scores in cancer patients of the HYPERCAN cohort.癌症患者 HYPERCAN 队列中 Khorana 评分和新维也纳 CATS 评分的效用。
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jul;21(7):1869-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.03.037. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Using the Khorana risk score to predict venous thromboembolism and overall survival in a cohort of Hispanic patients with solid malignancies.使用科拉纳风险评分预测一组患有实体恶性肿瘤的西班牙裔患者的静脉血栓栓塞和总生存期。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Nov 10;16:1470. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1470. eCollection 2022.
3
Risk assessment and primary prevention of VTE in patients with cancer: Advances, challenges, and evidence gaps.
癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症的风险评估与一级预防:进展、挑战与证据缺口。
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2022 Mar;35(1):101347. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2022.101347. Epub 2022 May 28.
4
Validation of the Khorana score for predicting venous thromboembolism in 40 218 patients with cancer initiating chemotherapy.验证 Khorana 评分在 40218 例开始化疗的癌症患者中预测静脉血栓栓塞的准确性。
Blood Adv. 2022 May 24;6(10):2967-2976. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006484.
5
Cardiovascular adverse events associated with BRAF versus BRAF/MEK inhibitor: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis using two large national registries.与 BRAF 与 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂相关的心血管不良事件:使用两个大型国家登记处进行的横断面和纵向分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):3862-3872. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3938. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
A Review of Colorectal Cancer in Terms of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Development, Symptoms and Diagnosis.关于结直肠癌的流行病学、危险因素、发展、症状及诊断的综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;13(9):2025. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092025.
7
Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer according to oncogenic status.结直肠癌患者根据致癌状态的静脉血栓栓塞发生率。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Nov;22(11):2026-2031. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02339-1. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Current and emerging biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌的现有和新兴生物标志物。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(Suppl 1):S7-S15. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5719. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
9
The Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞预测的 Khorana 评分:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Haematologica. 2019 Jun;104(6):1277-1287. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209114. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Association between oncogenic status and risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者致癌状态与静脉血栓栓塞风险的关系。
Respir Res. 2018 May 9;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0791-2.