Wiesel J, Grunwald A M, Tobiasz C, Robin B, Bodenheimer M M
Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5):1099-106. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1099.
The absolute cross-sectional area of a coronary stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography correlates well with its hemodynamic significance. We evaluated a combined approach using edge detection applied to the normal segment and videodensitometry applied to the stenosis to determine the absolute cross-sectional area of the stenosis (videodensity method). The results were then compared with those with the edge detection method applied directly to the stenosis. The area of the stenosis by the edge detection method was calculated by analyzing two orthogonal projections for irregular stenoses and with use of the formula for the area of an ellipse (ellipse method). The accuracy of both these techniques was assessed by analyzing digital angiograms acquired from closed-chest dogs in which 10 plastic cylinders with precisely machined circular and irregular lumina were inserted into the coronary arteries. Angiograms of irregular stenoses were acquired in two orthogonal views. The ellipse method applied to circular stenoses was very accurate, with r = .97, average absolute difference (AAD) = 0.21 mm2, and SEE = 0.30. For the videodensity method r = .97, AAD = 0.84 mm2, and SEE = 0.40. Irregular stenoses were better quantitated by the videodensity method applied in one view (AAD = 0.50 mm2, SEE = 0.47) than by the ellipse method applied in two orthogonal projections (AAD = 1.03 mm2, SEE = 0.87). Overall, the two methods were comparable in accuracy (for videodensity, AAD = 0.65 mm2, SEE = 0.71 vs AAD = 0.54 mm2, SEE = 0.79 for ellipse).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
通过定量冠状动脉造影测量的冠状动脉狭窄的绝对横截面积与其血流动力学意义密切相关。我们评估了一种联合方法,即对正常节段应用边缘检测,对狭窄部位应用视频密度测定法来确定狭窄的绝对横截面积(视频密度法)。然后将结果与直接对狭窄部位应用边缘检测法的结果进行比较。通过分析不规则狭窄的两个正交投影并使用椭圆面积公式(椭圆法)来计算边缘检测法测得的狭窄面积。通过分析从开胸犬获取的数字血管造影来评估这两种技术的准确性,在这些犬的冠状动脉中插入了10个具有精确加工的圆形和不规则管腔的塑料圆柱体。在两个正交视图中获取不规则狭窄的血管造影。应用于圆形狭窄的椭圆法非常准确,r = 0.97,平均绝对差值(AAD)= 0.21平方毫米,标准误(SEE)= 0.30。对于视频密度法,r = 0.97,AAD = 0.84平方毫米,SEE = 0.40。与在两个正交投影中应用椭圆法(AAD = 1.03平方毫米,SEE = 0.87)相比,在一个视图中应用视频密度法对不规则狭窄的定量效果更好(AAD = 0.50平方毫米,SEE = 0.47)。总体而言,两种方法在准确性方面具有可比性(视频密度法,AAD = 0.65平方毫米,SEE = 0.71;椭圆法,AAD = 0.54平方毫米,SEE = 0.79)。(摘要截断于250字)