Myung Yujin, Park Joseph Kyu-Hyung, Beom Jaewon, Lim Jae-Young, Park Young Suk, Ahn Sang-Hoon, Kang Eunyoung, Shin Hee-Chul, Kim Eun-Kyu, Nam Sun-Young, Heo Chan Yeong, Jeong Jae Hoon
From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 7;11(9):e5237. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005237. eCollection 2023 Sep.
This study aimed to discuss several surgical approaches for advanced-stage breast cancer-related lymphedema and compared their treatment outcomes.
The patients who underwent surgery with International Society of Lymphology stage III lymphedema were included in this study. The three surgical methods used here were (1) suction-assisted lipectomy with lymphovenous anastomosis, (2) autologous breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap combined with inguinal lymph node transfer, and (3) vascularized lymph node transfer with free omental flap. Analysis of the postoperative outcomes in the patients was based on the difference in volume between patients pre- and postoperatively, LYMPH-Q questionnaire, and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Eighty-seven patients with stage IIb or higher disease underwent surgery. 38 patients underwent suction-assisted lipectomy + lymphovenous anastomosis, 23 underwent autologous breast reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer + lymphovenous anastomosis, and 26 underwent right gastroepiploic omental vascularized lymph node transfer with lymphovenous anastomosis. The LYMPH-Q questionnaire, which evaluates patients' subjective satisfaction, showed that the autologous breast reconstruction group showed the greatest improvement, whereas in bioimpedance analysis, the omental flap group demonstrated the greatest postoperative improvement compared with preoperative values. However, suction-assisted lipectomy was considered the most effective surgical method for reducing limb volume in patients with high-stage lymphedema accompanied by fibrosis and volume increase.
We observed slightly different clinical effects for each surgical method; however, all surgical methods demonstrated a reduction in the degree of edema and an increase in patient satisfaction.
本研究旨在探讨晚期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的几种手术方法,并比较其治疗效果。
本研究纳入了接受国际淋巴学会III期淋巴水肿手术的患者。这里使用的三种手术方法分别是:(1)带淋巴静脉吻合的吸脂辅助脂肪切除术;(2)保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣联合腹股沟淋巴结转移的自体乳房重建术;(3)带游离网膜瓣的带血管蒂淋巴结转移术。基于患者术前和术后的体积差异、LYMPH-Q问卷以及生物电阻抗分析对患者的术后结果进行分析。
87例IIb期或更高分期疾病的患者接受了手术。38例患者接受了吸脂辅助脂肪切除术+淋巴静脉吻合术,23例接受了带血管蒂淋巴结转移+淋巴静脉吻合术的自体乳房重建术,26例接受了带淋巴静脉吻合术的右胃网膜带血管蒂淋巴结转移术。评估患者主观满意度的LYMPH-Q问卷显示,自体乳房重建组改善最大,而在生物阻抗分析中,网膜瓣组术后改善程度与术前相比最大。然而,吸脂辅助脂肪切除术被认为是减少伴有纤维化和体积增加的高分期淋巴水肿患者肢体体积最有效的手术方法。
我们观察到每种手术方法的临床效果略有不同;然而,所有手术方法均显示水肿程度减轻,患者满意度提高。