Suppr超能文献

间歇性与每日补充维生素D对提高循环25(OH)D浓度的疗效:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Efficacy of intermittent versus daily vitamin D supplementation on improving circulating 25(OH)D concentration: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Zhuang Yan, Zhu Zhe, Chi Peihan, Zhou Haibo, Peng Zhicheng, Cheng Haoyue, Xin Xing, Luo Wenliang, Si Shuting, Mo Minjia, Chen Danqing, Liu Hui, Yu Yunxian

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 24;10:1168115. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1168115. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D deficiency is a widespread issue globally, resulting in increased use of vitamin D supplements. However, it is unclear whether intermittent (weekly or monthly) vitamin D supplementation is as effective as daily supplementation in improving circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels.

METHODS

Three databases including Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched up to 10 November 2020. The risk of bias was evaluated according to Cochrane Collaboration's tool for rating methodological quality assessment. Direct and indirect comparisons between interventions and controls were performed by a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), where the mean difference (MD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to indicate the efficacy.

RESULTS

This NMA analysis included 116 RCTs with a total of 11,376 participants. Generally, we observed that 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly elevated regardless of vitamin D supplementation frequency. Although the findings of SUCRA indicated that daily vitamin D supplementation had a higher rank value than intermittent supplementation when the supplement dosage was similar, no statistically significant pooled mean differences of 25(OH)D concentration were noted between the daily supplementation group and intermittent supplementation group. Additionally, weekly supplementation with a total of 600,000 IU vitamin D supplementation during 3 months had the best efficacy in elevating 25(OH)D concentration (pooled MD = 63 nmol/L, 95%CI: 49-77). To achieve optimal 25(OH)D concentration (>75 nmol/L), we recommend 60,000 IU vitamin D supplementation monthly (~2,000 IU/day).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of intermittent vitamin D supplementation was similar to daily supplementation. Coupled with its convenience, the frequency and dosage of intermittent vitamin D supplements were recommended to reach the optimal 25(OH)D level.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=257257, PROSPERO CRD42021257257.

摘要

背景

维生素D缺乏是全球普遍存在的问题,导致维生素D补充剂的使用增加。然而,尚不清楚间歇性(每周或每月)补充维生素D在提高循环25-羟维生素D[25(OH)D]水平方面是否与每日补充同样有效。

方法

截至2020年11月10日,系统检索了包括Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆在内的三个数据库。根据Cochrane协作网的方法学质量评估评分工具评估偏倚风险。通过贝叶斯网络meta分析(NMA)对干预措施与对照之间进行直接和间接比较,其中平均差(MD)及其95%置信区间(CI)用于表示疗效。

结果

该NMA分析纳入了116项随机对照试验,共11376名参与者。总体而言,我们观察到无论维生素D补充频率如何,25(OH)D浓度均显著升高。虽然累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)的结果表明,当补充剂量相似时,每日补充维生素D的排序值高于间歇性补充,但每日补充组和间歇性补充组之间25(OH)D浓度的合并平均差无统计学显著差异。此外,在3个月内每周补充总计600000国际单位维生素D在提高25(OH)D浓度方面疗效最佳(合并MD = 63 nmol/L,95%CI:49 - 77)。为达到最佳25(OH)D浓度(>75 nmol/L),我们建议每月补充60000国际单位维生素D(约2000国际单位/天)。

结论

间歇性补充维生素D的疗效与每日补充相似。鉴于其便利性,建议采用间歇性维生素D补充剂的频率和剂量以达到最佳25(OH)D水平。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=257257,PROSPERO CRD42021257257。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c7e/10488712/a884efa71c58/fnut-10-1168115-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验